1 |
Arams, C., & Callahan, C. (1995). The reliability and validity of performance task for evaluating science process skills. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(1), 14-20.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Chin, C. (2003). Success with investigations: Strategies for facilitating student science investigations. The Science Teacher, 70(2), 34-40.
|
3 |
Chinn, C., & Malhotra, B. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-218.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Fowler, M. (1990). The diet cola test. Science Scope, 13(4), 32-34.
|
5 |
Germann, P., & Odom, A. (1996). Student performance on asking questions, identifying variables, and formulating hypotheses. School Science & Mathematics, 96(4), 192-202.
DOI
|
6 |
Glaser, R., & Chi, M. (1988). Overview. In Chi, Glaser, & Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp.15-28), Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
7 |
Jhun Young-Seok, Park Jong-Chan(2006). An Analysis of the Science High-School Students' Readiness to Perform Open-Inquiry Tasks in Physics. Sae Mulli (The Korean Physical Society), 52(4). 345-355.
|
8 |
Ju Mi-Na, Kim Hyun-Joo(2013). Understanding Problem-Solving Type Inquiry Learning and it's Effect on the Improvement of Ability to Design Experiments: A Case Study on Science-Gifted Students. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(2), 425-443.
DOI
|
9 |
Jung Jin-Soo(2008). Effects of the Teaching and Learning Programs for Science Teachers′ Scientific Hypothesis Testing-method Invention. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 28(6), 664-674.
과학기술학회마을
|
10 |
Jung Jin-Soo, Kwon Yong-Ju(2007).Research Articles : Prospective Science Teachers' Hypothesis-Testing Methods Generated on the Potato Juice Task. Biology Education, 35(2), 320-327.
DOI
|
11 |
Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. London:The MIT Press
|
12 |
Kim Sun-Ja, Choi Byung-Soon(2005).Characteristics of Experimental Design and Evidence Choice of Elementary School Students in Problem Solving Process Related to Controlling Variable .Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 25(2), 111-121.
과학기술학회마을
|
13 |
Lee Sae-Jong(2013). The Analysis of the Process Elements and the Characteristics of Elementary Tteachers' Designing Experiment Activities. master's thesis, korea national university of education.
|
14 |
Lee Yoon-Ha, Kang Soon-Hee(2011). The Analysis of the Ability to Control Variables and the Types of Controlling Variables by Junior High School Students. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 31(1), 32-47.
과학기술학회마을
|
15 |
Martin, D.J.(1997). Elementary science method. New York: Delmar Publisher.
|
16 |
Park Jong-won(2003).An Analysis of the Experimental Designs Suggested by Students for Testing Scientific Hypotheses. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23(2), 200-213.
과학기술학회마을
|
17 |
Shin Ji-Eun, Han Ki-Soon, Jung Hyun-Chul, Park Byung-Gun, Choe Seung-Urn(2002). What are the Differences Between Scientifically Gifted and Normal Students in the Aspects of Creativity?. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(1), 158-175.
과학기술학회마을
|
18 |
Tan, S. K. (1997). The elements of expertise. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 68(2), 30-33.
|
19 |
VanTassel-Baska, J., Bass, G., Ries, R., Poland, D., & Avery, L. (1998). A national study of science curriculum effectiveness with high ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(4). 200-211.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Yang Il-Ho, Jeong Jin-Woo, Hur Myung, Kim Young-Shin, Kim Jin-Soo, Cho Hyun-Jun, Oh Chang-Ho (2006). Research Articles : An Analysis of Laboratory Instructions in Elementary School Science. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(3), 281-295.
|
21 |
Yang Il-Ho, Ryu Seol-Jin, Lim Sung-Man(2009). The Analysis of the Process Elements and the Characteristics of Biologists' and Gifted Students' Designing Experiment Activities.
|