Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2021.30.8.629

A Study on Environmental Policy Integration for the Efficient Use and Conservation of Natural Environmental Values  

Yoon, Ho-Jung (Department of Landscape Architecture, Hankyong National University)
Yeom, Sung-Jin (Department of Landscape Architecture, Hankyong National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Environmental Science International / v.30, no.8, 2021 , pp. 629-646 More about this Journal
Abstract
Damage to the natural environment is becoming increasingly complex in modern society, expanding to impact not only the environment but also society and the economy. Various systems and policies based on sustainability have been promoted internationally. Legal systems and policies based on evaluation systems such as land environment assessment and urban ecological status maps, have been implemented in Korea. However, most of Korea institutions and policies related to the natural environment have been directed toward the conservation of the natural environment, and restricted to in simple theoretical frameworks with various limitations. Therefore, this study analyzed the definition and value of the natural environment for a fundamental conceptual approach to the valuation of the natural environment. Based on this, we modeled the policy process for a flexible evaluation system suitable for the actual situation of Korea natural environment through a review of the integration of environmental policy proposed in Europe.
Keywords
Natural environmental value; Environmental policy integration; Sustainable development; Policy process modeling;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 European Environment Agency, 2015, Natural capital and ecosystem services, Europe.
2 Ahn, E. Y., Kim, S. G., 2013, Losses of indirect use and non-use values of groundwater or environmental challenges in terms of the inaction costs of OECD, Econ. Environ. Geol., 46, 85-91.   DOI
3 Bache, I., Flinders, M., 2004, Multi-level Governance, Oxford University Press, USA, 1-11.
4 Kneese, A. V., Ayres, R. U., D'Arge, R. C., 1970, Economics and the environment: A materials balance approach, 1st ed., REF Press, New York.
5 Chan, K. M. A., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Diaz, S., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Gould, R., Hannahs, N., Jax, K., Klain, S., W. Luck, G., Martin-Lopez, B., Muraca, B., Norton, B., Ott, K., Pasucal, U., Satterfield, T., Tadaki, M., Taggart, J., Turner, N., Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 1462-1465.
6 European Environment Agency, 2020, Natural capital and ecosystem services, Europe.
7 Biebaum, R., Cowie, A., 2018, Integration: to solve complex environmental problems, Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel(STAP), USA.
8 Brown, L., M Tomerini, D., 2009, Environmental mainstreaming in developing countries, Urban Research Program, Griffith School of Environment Griffith University Nathan 4111 Brisbane, Australia.
9 Burck, J., Hagen, U., Bals, C., Hohne, N., Nascimento, L., 2021, Climate change performance index 2021: background and methodology, Germanwatch, Europe.
10 Freeman, A. M. III., A. Herriges, J., L. Kling, C., 2014, The measurement of environmental and resource values, 3rd ed., Taylor & Francis, Routledge, New York.
11 Freeman, A. M. III., Robert, H. H., Allen, V. K., 1973, The economics of environmental policy, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 55, 687.
12 Hargrove, C., 1992, Week anthropocentric intrinsic value, The Monist, 75, 183-207.   DOI
13 Hong, S. P., 2016, Implication measures between strategic environmental impact assessment and sustainable development indicators, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 25(1), 63-76.   DOI
14 hUiginn, O., Flynn, B., 2016, Environmental policy integration: innovation and change, Report 290, epa Research, National University of Ireland, Europe.
15 International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2014, Climate change 2014 sysnthesis report summary for policymakers, Geneva.
16 Kang, S. W., Lee, C. H., 2014, Mid- to long-term environmental outlook and response strategies, Korea Environment Institute, Korea.
17 2013, The Freshwater Blog, https://freshwaterblog.net/2013/06/20/what-is-the-ecosystem-services-approach/.
18 Kim, G. H., Choi, H. S., Kim, D. B., Jung, Y. R., Jin, D. Y., 2020, Urban sprawl prediction in 2030 using decision tree, Journal of Korean Environment Restoration Technology, 23, 125-135.
19 Kim, H. S., 2007, A Study on the management plan of sustainable development indicators and environmental evaluation, Korea Environment Institute, Korea.
20 Kim, Y. S., 2014, Introduction of integrated environmental management system and policy in advanced countries, Korea.
21 2020, San Jose State University, https://www.sjsu.edu/sustainability/academics/.
22 2020, Technology Arts Sciences TH Koln, https://ssi.wi.th-koeln.de/.
23 2021, E-learning module, https://www.marine-ecosystem-services.eu/en/Section-3/3-1-building-a-common-language-definitions-and-nomenclatures/3-1-7-concept-of-values.
24 2021, Global Footprint Network, https://www.footprintnetwork.org/our-work/ecological-footprint/.
25 2021, Sustainable Development Repot, https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/.
26 Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., V. O'neill, R., Paruelo, J., G. Raskin, R., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M., 1997, The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387, 253-260.   DOI
27 Cressell, I., Murphy, H., 2016, Importance of biodiversity, Commonwealth of Australia.
28 European Commission, 2003, Integration of environment into transport policy - from strategies to good practice, Europe.
29 De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., Boumans, R. M., 2002, A Typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, Ecol. Econ., 41, 393-408.   DOI
30 Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), 2007, An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services, Crown, London.
31 European Commission, 2007, Environmental integration handbook for EC development co-operation, Europe.
32 Kumar, P., 2010, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. Earthscan, London.
33 Korea Environment Institute, 2017, A Comprehensive study of environmental values for integrated analysis of environmental and economic conditions, Korea.
34 Korea Environment Institute, 2017, Challenges for introducing different approaches to environmental valuation, 21(4), Korea.
35 Korea Environment Institute, 2017, Understanding and policy directions for total natural resources management. Report 28, Korea.
36 Lafferty, W. M., Hovden, E., 2003, Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework, Env. Polit., 12, 1.   DOI
37 Lee, G. S., 2020, Analysis and implications of KOICA environmental mainstreaming implementation: focusing on organizations and systems, Journal of International Development Cooperation, 15, 49-83.   DOI
38 Reid, W. V., Mooney, H. A., Cropper, A., Capistrano, D., Carpenter, S. R., Chopra, K., Dasgupta, P., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., Hassan, R., Kasperson, R., Leemans, R., May, R. M., McMichael, A. J., Pingali, P., Samper, C., Scholes, R., Watson, R. T., Zakri, A. H., Shidong, Z., Ash, N. J., Bennett, E., Kumar, P., Lee, M. J., Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Simons, H., Thonell, J., Zurek, M. B., 2005, Ecosystem and human well-being: synthesis, Island Press, Washington, DC.
39 Lee, B. W., Hwang, K. J., Kim, N. K., 2005, Environmental management, 1st ed., You, E. J., Lee, K. Y., Kim, Y. O., Ecolivre, Korea.
40 Lee, G. G., Yang, B. E., 2001, A Determinant model for methods to calculate the weighted value of each indicator for environmental evaluation, J EIA, 10, 59-71.
41 Kwak, S. Y., Shin, J. W., 2015, Environmental value mid- to long-term research demand survey, Korea Environment Institute, Korea.
42 Lee, D. K., Jeon, S. W., 1997, A Conceptual study of sustainable city indicators: with priority given to environmental indicators, J EIA, 6, 33-45.
43 University of Latvia, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Baltic Environmental Forum, 2018, The guidebook on the introduction to the ecosystem service framework and its application in integrated planning, Europe.
44 Seymour, F., Maurer, C., Quiroga, R., 2005, Environmental mainstreaming: applications in the context of modernization of the state, social development, competitiveness, and regional integration, Inter American Development Bank (IADB), USA.
45 Shah, A., 2014, Why is biodiversity important? Who cares?, Global Issues.
46 Tadaki, M., Sinner, J., Chan, M. A. K., 2017, Making sense of environmental values: a typology of concepts: a typology of concepts, Ecol. Soc., 22, 7.
47 The Economics of Ecosystems & Biodiversity (TEEB), 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems & Biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations, Earthscan, London.
48 You, J. H., Park, K. H., Jung, S. G., 2005, A Study on importance of assessment factors and indicators of natural ecosystem for environmentally friendly land conservation, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 14(4), 165-177.
49 The Economics of Ecosystems & Biodiversity (TEEB), 2012, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity in local and regional policy and management, 1st ed., Wittmemr, H., Gundimeda, H., Routledge, London.
50 Turner, R. K., Paavola, J., Cooper, P., Farber, S., Jessamy, V., Georgiou, S., 2003, Valuing natur: learned and future research directions, Ecological Economics, 46, 493-510.   DOI
51 Mullally, G. M., Dunphy, N., 2015, State of play review of environmental policy integration literature, National Economic & Social Council, Europe.
52 Walz, A., Schmidt, K., Ruiz-Frau, A., A. Nicholas, K., Bierry, A., de Vries Lentsch, A., Dyankov, A., Joyce, D., H. Liski, A., Marba, N., T. Rosario, I., S. K. Scholte, S., 2019, Sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services for operational ecosystem management: mapping applications by decision contexts in Europe, Regional Environmental Change, 19, 2245-2259.   DOI
53 Wendling, Z. W., Emerson, J. W., de Sherbinin, A., Esty, D. C., Environmental performance index 2020, Yale center for Environmental Law & Policy, USA.
54 World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), 2016, Living planet report, Switzerland.
55 Janicke, M., Jorgens, H., 2000, Strategic environmental planning and uncertainty: a cross national comparison of green plans in industrialized countries, Policy Stud J, 28(3), 612-632.   DOI
56 Lee, S. J., Ryu. J. E., Jeon, S. W., 2020, An Analysis of environmental policy effect on green space change using logistic regression model, Journal of Korean Environment Restoration Technology, 23, 13-30.
57 Liu, J., Monney, A. H., Hull, V., Li, S., Gaskell, J., Hertel, T., Lubchenco, J., C Seto, J., H. Gleick, P., Kremen, C., 2015, Systems integration for global sustainability, Science, 347(6225).
58 Mickwitz, P., Aix, F., Beck, S., Carss, D., Ferrand, N., Gorg, C., Jensen, A., Kivimaa, P., Kuhlicke, C., Kuindersma, W., Manez, M., Melanen, M., Monni, S., Pedersen B. A., Reinert, H., van Bommel, S., 2009, Climate policy integration, coherence and governance, Partnership for European environmental research(PEER), Helsinki, Europe.
59 Otoiu, A., Gradinaru, G., 2018, Proposing a composite environmental index to account for the actual state and changes in environmental dimensions, as a critique to EPI, Ecological Indicators, 93, 1209-1221.   DOI
60 Nilsson, M., Zamparutti, T., Petersen, J. E., Nykvist, B., Rudberg, P., McGuinn, J., 2012, Understanding policy coherence: analytical framework and examples of sector-environment policy interactions in the EU, Environ. Policy Gov., 22, 395-423.   DOI
61 Pearce, D. W., Pretty, J. N., 1993, Economic values and the natural world, Earthscan. Publications, London.
62 Scholte, S. S. K., van Teefelen, A. J. A., Verburg, P. H., 2015, Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: a review of concepts and methods, Ecol. Econ., 114, 67-78.   DOI
63 Seong, H, E., 2009, Eco-innovation policies and policy integration the finnish case, Korea Environmental Policy And Administration Society, 8, 119~144.