Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2016.25.6.817

Comparison of Filtration Resistances according to Membrane Cleaning Methods  

Han, Song-Hee (Department of Environmental Engineering, Hoseo University)
Chang, In-Soung (Department of Environmental Engineering, Hoseo University)
Publication Information
Journal of Environmental Science International / v.25, no.6, 2016 , pp. 817-827 More about this Journal
Abstract
The resistance in series model has been frequently used for determination of various filtration resistance to correctly understand the membrane fouling behaviour in MBR (membrane bio-reactor) for wastewater treatment. The cake layer resistance ($R_c$) which is commonly determined by calculation of flux dataset that are obtained empirically before and after removing the cake layer on membrane surface. However, the calculated Rc values are very dependent on the cleaning methods adapted for removal of cake layer. This study investigated how the various cleaning options affect $R_c$. Seven different cleaning methods were employed: i) ultrasonication (100 W, 10 min), ii) ultrasonication (200 W, 60 min), iii) ultrasonication (400 W, 120 min), iv) water rinsing in a shaker (100 rpm, 10 min), v) water rinsing in a shaker (300 rpm, 60 min), vi) water rinsing, vii) sponge scrubbing. For the hydrophilic PES membrane, the cake layer removal efficiencies ranged from 64% to 10%, indicating that the removal of cake layer was highly dependent on the cleaning options. For the hydrophobic PVDF membrane, the cake layer removal efficiencies ranged from 79% to 97%. Consequently, a standardized method for cake layer removal to determine cake resistance ($R_c$) is needed for correct interpretation of the fouling phenomena.
Keywords
Cake layer; Cleaning; Membrane fouling; Resistance in series model;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Beyer, M., Lohrengel, B., Nghiem, L. D., 2010, Membrane fouling and chemical cleaning in water recycling applications, Desalination, 250, 977-981.   DOI
2 Chang, I. S., Bag, S. O., Lee, C. H., 2001, Effects of membrane fouling on solute rejection during membrane filtration of activated sludge, Process Biochemistry, 36, 855-860.   DOI
3 Chang, I. S., Field, R., Cui, Z., 2009, Limitations of resistance in series model for fouling analysis in membrane bioreactors: A Cautionary note, Desalination and Water Treatment, 8, 31-36.   DOI
4 Chen, C. C. V., Berube, P. R., Hall, E. R., 2007, Shear profiles inside gas sparged submerged hollow fiber membrane modules, Journal of Membrane Science, 297, 104-120.   DOI
5 Choi, J. G., Baea, T. H., Kim, J. H., Tak, T. M., Randall, A. A., 2002, The Behavior of membrane fouling initiation on the crossflow membrane bioreactor system, Journal of Membrane Science, 203, 103-113.   DOI
6 Chung, T. H., Lee, J. H., Kim, H. G., Bae, Y. K., 2012, Effect of fouling reducing additives on membrane filtration resistance of activated sludge, Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Engineers, 34(6), 406-413.   DOI
7 Fang, H. H. P., Shi, X., 2005, Pore fouling of microfiltration membranes by activated sludge, Journal of Membrane Science, 264, 161-166.   DOI
8 Farquharson, A., Zhou, H., 2010, Relationships of activated sludge characteristics to fouling rate and critical flux in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment, Chemosphere, 79, 149-155.   DOI
9 Field, R., Hughes, D., Cui, Z., Tirlapur, U., 2008, Some observations on the chemical cleaning of fouled membranes, Desalination, 227, 132-138.   DOI
10 Han, X., Wang, Z., Wang, X., Zheng, X., Ma, J., Wu, Z., 2016, Microbial responses to membrane cleaning using sodium hypochlorite in membrane bioreactors:Cell integrity, key enzymes and intracellular reactive oxygen species, Water Research, 88, 293-300.   DOI
11 Kim, M. G., Nakhla, G., 2009, Comparative studies on membrane fouling between two membrane-based biological nutrient removal systems, Journal of Membrane Science, 331, 91-99.   DOI
12 Lim, A. L., Bai, R., 2003, Membrane fouling and cleaning in microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater, Journal of Membrane Science, 216, 279-290.   DOI
13 Maximous, N., Nakhla, G., Wan, W., 2009, Comparative assessment of hydrophobic and hydrophilic membrane fouling in wastewater applications, Journal of Membrane Science, 339, 93-99.   DOI
14 Meng, F., Yang, F., 2007, Fouling mechanisms of deflocculated sludge, normal sludge, and bulking sludge in membrane bioreactor, Journal of Membrane Science, 305, 48-56.   DOI
15 Miyoshi, T., Yuasa, K., Ishigami, T., Rajabzadeh, S., Kamio, E., Ohmukai, Y., Saeki, D., Ni, J., Matsuyama, H., 2015, Effect of membrane polymeric materials on relationship betweensurface pore size and membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors, Applied Surface Science, 330, 351-357.   DOI
16 Park, T. Y., Choi, C. K., 2015, Analysis of hydrophobic membrane fouling on the COD loading rates at the state of passive adsorption in membrane bioreactor, Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Engineers, 37(3), 152-158.   DOI
17 Poele, S. T., Graaf, J. V. D., 2005, Enzymatic cleaning in ultrafiltration of wastewater treatment plant effluent, Desalination, 179, 73-81.   DOI
18 Wang, Z., Wu, Z., Tang, S., 2009, Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor, Water Research, 43, 2504-2512.   DOI
19 Wang, Z., Ma, J., Tang, C. Y., Kimura, K., Wang, Q., Han, X., 2014, Membrane cleaning in membrane bioreactors: A Review, Journal of Membrane Science, 468, 276-307.   DOI
20 Zhang, J., Zhou, J., Liu, Y., Fane, A. G., 2010, A Comparison of membrane fouling under constant and variable organic loadings in submerge membrane bioreactors, Water Research, 44, 5407-5413.   DOI
21 Zhang, Z., Bligh, M. W., Wang, Y., Leslie, G. L., Bustamante, H., David Waite, T., 2015, Cleaning strategies for iron-fouled membranes from submerged membrane bioreactor treatment of wastewaters, Journal of Membrane Science, 475, 9-21.   DOI