Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5322/JES.2009.18.10.1123

Evaluation of Exposure to Indoor Volatile Organic Compounds by Utilizing Emission Characteristics and Emission Factor of Household Mosquito Repellents  

Jo, Wan-Kuen (Department of Environmental Engineering, Kyungpook National University)
Lee, Jong-Hyo (Safety Management Team, Kumho Petrochemical Corporation)
Publication Information
Journal of Environmental Science International / v.18, no.10, 2009 , pp. 1123-1134 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was designed to evaluate qualitatively and quantitatively the pollutant compositions, which were emitted from three types of mosquito repellents(MRs)(mat-, liquid-vaporized, and coil-type) by utilizing a 50-L environmental chamber. A qualitative analysis revealed that 42 compounds were detected on the gas chromatography/mass spectrometer system, and that the detection frequency depended upon chemical types. Nine of the 42 compounds exhibited a detection frequency of 100%. Four aromatic compounds(benzene, ethyl benzene, toluene, and xylene) were detected in all test MRs. The concentration equilibriums in the environmental chamber were achieved within 180 min after sample introduction. The coil-type MR represented higher chamber concentrations as compared with the mat- or liquid-vaporized-type MR, with respect to the target compounds except for naphthalene. In particular, the chamber concentrations of ethyl benzene, associated with the use of coil-type MR, were between 0.9 and $65\;mg\;m^{-3}$ whereas those of mat- and liquid-vaporized-type MRs we~e between 0.5 and $2.0\;mg\;m^{-3}$and 0.3 and $1.4\;mg\;m^{-3}$, respectively. However, naphthalene concentrations in the chamber, where a liquid-vaporized-type MR was placed, were measured as between 17.8 and $56.3\;mg\;m^{-3}$, but not detected in the chamber, where a mat- or coil-type MR was placed. The empirical model fitted well with the time-series concentrations in the environmental chamber(in most cases, determination coefficient, $R^2$ ≿ 0.9), thereby suggesting that the model was suitable for testing emissions. In regards to the target compounds except for benzene, although they were emitted from the MRs, health risk from individual exposure to them were estimated not to be significant when comparing exposure levels with no observed adverse exposure levels or lowest observed adverse exposure levels of corresponding compounds. However, it was concluded that the use of MRs could be an important indoor source as regards benzene.
Keywords
Mosquito repellent; Mat-type; Liquid-vaporized; Coil-type; Chamber concentration;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Zhu J., X. L. Cao and R. Beauchamp, 2001, Determination of 2-butoxy ethanol emissions from selected consumer products and its application in assessment of inhalation exposure associated with cleaning tasks, Environ. Int., 27, 589-597   DOI   ScienceOn
2 AkIand G. and D. A. Whitaker, 2000, Characterizing the sources of human exposure to Proposition 65 substances. RTI/6830/02-03 F, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC
3 Jensen B., P. Wolkoff, C. K. Wilkins and P. A. Clausen, 1995, Characterization of linoleum: Part I. Measurement of volatile organic compounds by use of the field and laboratory emission cell 'FLEC', Indoor Air, 5, 38-43   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Wolkoff P., 1998, Impact of air velocity, temperature, humidity, and air on long-term VOC emissions from building products, Atmos. Environ., 32, 2659-2668   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Wolkoff P. and P. A. Nielsen, 1996, A new approach for indoor climate labelling of building materials-emission testing, modelling, and comfort evaluation, Atmos. Environ., 30, 2679-2689   DOI   ScienceOn
6 EHD(Environmental Health Directorate), 1998, Exposure factors for assesing total daily intake of Priority Substances by the general population of Canada. Unpublished report, March 1998, Priority Substances Section, Environmental Health Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa
7 Edwards R. D., C. Schweizer, M. Jantunen, H. K. Lai, L. Bayer-Oglesby, K. Katsouyanni, M. Nieuwenhuijsen, K. Saarela, R. Sram and N. Kunzli, 2005, Personal exposures to VOCs in the upper end ofthe distribution-relationships to indoor, outdoor and workplace concentrations, Atmos. Environ., 39, 2299-2307   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Li A., T. M. Schoonover, Q. Zou, F. Norlock, L. M. Conroy, P. A. Scheff and R. A. Waddeen, 2005, Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in residential air of ten Chicago area homes: Concentrations and influencing factors, Atmos. Environ., 39, 3491-3501   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Reisen F. and J. Arey, 2005, Atmospheric reactions influence seasonal PAH and nitro-PAH concentrations in the Los Angles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 64-73   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Zuraimi M. S., C. A. Roulet, K. W. Tham, S. C. Sekhar, K. W. David Cheong, N. H. Wong and K. H. Lee, 2006, A comparative study of VOCs in Singapore and European office buildings, Build. Environ., 41, 316-329   DOI   ScienceOn
11 ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry), 2005, ToxFAQs for Naphthalene, I-Methylnaphthalene, and 2-Methylnaphthalene. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Available online at http://www.adsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts67.html
12 Das R. K., K. Sahu and B. C. Dash, 1994, Induction of chromosome aberrations and micronuclei in pulmonary alveolar maerophages of rats following inhalation od mosquito coil smoke, Mut. Res., 320, 285-292   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Wallace L. A., E. Pellizzari, B. Leaderer, H. Zelon and L. Sheldon, 1987, Emissions of volatile organic compounds from building materials and household products, Atmos. Environ., 21, 385-393   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Sack T. M., D. H. Steele, K. Hammerstrom and J. Remmers, 1992, A survey of household products for volatile organic compounds, Atmos. Environ., 26, 1063-1070   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Knoppel H. and H. Schauenburg, 1989, Screening of household products for the emission of volatile organic compounds, Environ. Int., 15, 413-418   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Colombo A., M. De Bortoli, H. Knoppel, H. Schauenburg and H. Vissers, 1991, Small chamber tests and headspace analysis of volatile organic compounds emitted from household products, Indoor Air, 1, 13-21   DOI   ScienceOn
17 USEPA(United States Environmental protection Agency), 2003, Volatile organic Compounds in Various Sample Matrics Using Equilibrium Headspace Analysis, USEPA Method 5021A, Revision 1, June 2003
18 Katsoyiannis A., P. Leva and D. Kotzias, 2006, Determination of volatile organic compounds emitted from household products: the case of velvet carpets (Moquettes), Fresen. Environ. Bull., 15, 943-949
19 Kemmlein S., O. Hahn and O. Jann, 2003, Emissions of organophosphate and brominated flame retardants from selected consumer products and building materials, Atmos. Environ., 37, 5485-5493   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Wilke O., O. Jann and D. Brodner, 2004, VOC- and SVOC- emissions from adhesives, floor coverings and complete floor structures, Indoor Air, 14, 98-107   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Guo H., F. Murray and S. C. Lee, 2003, The development of volatile organic compound emission house-a case study, Build. Environ., 38, 1413-1422   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Li M., C. -L. Wu, A. -Q. Zhao and Y. Yang, 2008, State-space model for airborne particles in multizone indoor environments, Atmos. Environ. 42, 5340-5349   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Lin C. -C., K. -P. Yu, P. Zhao and G. W. -M. Lee, 2009, Evaluation of impact factors on VOC emissions and concentrations from wooden flooring based on chamber tests, Build. Environ. 44, 525-533   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Ramesh A. and A. Vijayalakshmi, 2001, Monitoring of allethrin, deltamethrin, esbiothrin, prallethrin and transfluthrin in air during the use of household mosquito repellents, J. Environ. Monit., 3, 191-193   DOI   ScienceOn
25 IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer), 2002, Monographs on the Evaluation of Carconogenic Risk to Humans, vol. 82. IARC, Lyon, France, 367
26 OEHHA (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment), 2003, Proposition 65 Status Report Safe Harbor Levels: No Significant Risk Levels for Carcinogens and Maximum Allowable Dose Levels for Chemicals Causing Reproductive Toxicity. California Environmental Protection Agency, OEHHA, Sacramento, CA. Accessed at http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/pdf/ june2003StatusReport.pdf
27 Azizi B. H. O. and R. L. Henry, 1991, The effects of indoor environmental factors on respiratory illness in primary school in Kuala Lumpur, Int. J. Epidemiol., 20, 144-149   DOI
28 Liu W. K., H. R. Ng and C. C. Wong, 1989, Biochemical and cellular changes in bronehoalveolar lavaged samples from rats after inhalation of mosquito- coil smoke. Toxicol. Letters, 45, 121-132   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Liu W. K. and S. E. Sun, 1988, Ultrastructural changes of tracheal epithelium and alveolar macrophages of rats exposed to mosquito coil smoke, Toxicol. Letters, 41, 145-157   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Liu W. K. and M. H. Wong, 1987, Toxic effects of mosquito coil (A Mosquito Repellent) smoke on rats: II. Morphological changes of the respiratory system. Toxicol. Letters, 39, 231-239   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Cheng V., H R Lee and C. S. Chen, 1992, Morphological changes in the respiratory system of mice after inhalation of of mosquito-coil smoke. Toxicol. Letters, 62, 163-177   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Moorthy M. V. and P. B. Murthy, 1994, Analysis of sister chromatid exchange, micronucleus and chromosomal aberration frequencies in rodents exposed to mosquito-coil smoke by inhalation route, ToxicoI. Letters, 70, 357-362   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Lee S. C. and B. Wang, 2006, Charactristics of emis sions of air pollutants from mosquito coils and candies burning in a large environmental chamber, Atmos. Environ., 40, 2128-2138   DOI   ScienceOn
34 한국환경과학회, 2008, 밀러의 알기쉬운 환경과학, 11판, 시그마 프레스, 465pp
35 Liu W., J. Zhang, J. H. Hashim, J. Jalaludin, Z. Hashim and B. D. Goldstein, 2003, Mosquito Coil Emissions and Health Implications, Environ. Health Persp., 111, 1454-1460   DOI
36 Chang J. -Y. and J. -M. Lin, 1998, Aliphatic aldehydes and allethrin in mosquito-coil smoke, Chemosphere, 36, 617-624   DOI   ScienceOn