Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5322/JES.2006.15.11.1077

Habitat Types of Wintering Season Wildbirds Depending on Land Use, Hanam  

Kim, Jeong-Ho (Department of Specialization Project, Dongmoon Construction)
Publication Information
Journal of Environmental Science International / v.15, no.11, 2006 , pp. 1077-1086 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims at analyzing relationships between land use and habitat types of winter wildbirds to provide basic understanding of ecosystem for preservation and restoration of urban ecosystem in the future. The research area is Hanam City. Researches on land use types showed Hanam City had 79.1% of greenspace and openspace, but intensive urban development has been taking place in greenspace that is adjacent to urban districts. This has brought the problems of lack of greenspace in urban districts and damages to cultivated areas and grassland. A total of 61 and 8,642 populations of winter wildbird species were observed in research areas. Paradoxornis webbiann(16.91), Passer montanus(11.93), Pica pica(6.88) were dominant species. When they were divided according to habitat types, 20 species of interior species, 8 species of interior-edge generalist species, 12 species of edge species and 3 species of urban species were observed. When which land use type was mostly served as wildbirds habitats was examined, urban species(3 species and 290 populations) was a dominant species in urban districts while in greenspace and openspaece, water species(19species and 3,075 populations) including winter migratory birds was. Among greenspace and openspaece, edge species was dominant in forest while urban species was a dominant species in cultivated areas. This shows there is a need to improve diversity of wildbirds through restoration of cultivated areas in the central part of Hanam City.
Keywords
Urban Ecosystem; Dominance; Density; Diversity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Lofvenhaft, K., C. Bjorn and M. Ihse, 2002, Biotope patterns in urban areas: a conceptual model integrationg biodiversity issues in spatial planning, Landscape and Urban Planning, 58, 223-240   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Jokirnaki, J., J. Suhonen, K. Inki and S. Jokinen, 1996, Biogeographical comparison of winter bird assemblages in urban environments in Finland, J. Biogeogr., 23, 379-386   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Loman, J. and T. von Schantz, 1991, Birds in farmland-more species in small than in large habitat gradients, Conserv., Biol., 5, 176-188   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Rebele, F., 1994, Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems, Global Ecol., Biogeogr., Lett., 4, 173-187   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Root, R. B., 1967, The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-gray gnatcatcher, - Ecol., monogr., 37, 317-350   DOI   ScienceOn
6 李宇新, 1990, 森木環境構造と鳥類の採餌ニシチに關する硏究, 北海道大學大學院博土學位論文, 166pp
7 Whittaker, R. H., 1972, Evolution and measurement of species diversity, Taxon, 21, 213-251   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Mills, S. G., J. B. Dunning and J. M. Bates, 1989, Effects of urbanization on breeding bird community structure in southwestern desert habitats, Condor, 91, 416-428   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Munyenyernne, F., J. Harris and J. Hone, 1989, Determinants of bird populations in an urban area, Aust., J. Ecol., 14, 549-557   DOI
10 Pearson, S. M., 1993, The spatial extent and relative influence of landscape-level factors on wintering bird populations, Landsc., Ecol., 8, 3-18   DOI
11 Robertson, J. G. M. and A. Berg, 1992, Status and population changes of farmland birds in southern Sweden, Orn., Svec., 2, 119-130
12 Sauvajot, R. M., M. Buechner, D. A. Kamrad and C. M. Schonewald, 1998, Patterns of human disturbance and response by small mammals. and birds in chaparral near urban development, Urban Ecosystems, 2, 279-297   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Vanhinsbergh, D., S. Gough, R. F. Fuller and D. R. E. Brierley, 2002, Summer and winter bird communities in recently established farm woodlands in lowland England, Agric., Ecosyt., Environ., 92, 123-136   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Yaukey, P. H., 1996, Patterns of avian population density, habitat use, and flocking behabvior in urban and rural habitats during winter, Prof., Geogr., 48, 70-81   DOI
15 Bender, D. J., T. A Contreras and L. Fahrig, 1998, Habitat loss and population decline: A meta-analysis of the patch size' effect, Ecology, 79, 517-533   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Berg, A., 2002, Composition and diversity of bird communities in Swedish farmland-forest mosaic landscapes, Bird Study, 49, 153-165   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Bibbly, C. L., N. D. Burgess and D. A Hill, 1992, Bird census techniques, Academic Press, 257pp
18 DeGraaf, R. M., 1991, Winter foraging guild structure and habitat associations in suburban bird communities, Landsc., Urban Plann., 21, 173-180   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Blanco, G. and T. Velasco, 1996, Bird-habitat relationships in an urban park during winter, Folia Zool, 45, 35-42
20 Bolger, D. T., T. A. Scottand and J. T. Rotenberry, 1997, Breeding bird abundance in an urbanizing landscape in coastal southern California, Conserv, Biol., 7, 406-42l
21 Fuller, R. J., R. D. Gregory, D. W. Gibbons, J. H. Marchant, J. D. Wilson, S. R. Baillie and N. Cater, 1995, Population declines and range contractions among lowland farmland birds in Britain, Conserv., Biol., 9, 1425-1441   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Hooper, R. G., H.. S. Grawford and R. F. Harlow, 1973, Bird density and diversity as . related to vegetation in forest recreational area, J. of Forestry, 71, 766-769
23 Jokimaki, J. and J. Suhonen, 1998, Distribution and habitat selection of wintering birds in urban environments, Landsc., Urban Plann., 39, 253-263   DOI   ScienceOn
24 McCollin, D., 1993, Avian distribution patterns in a fragmented wooded landscape(North Humberside, UK): the role of between-patch and' within patch structure, Global Ecology and Biogeography letters, 3, 48-62   DOI   ScienceOn
25 김영숙,박현우,권미경,김수일,2002,산림환경 구조에 따른 조류군집 비교연구,한국조류학회지,9(2),105-114
26 문화재청,2004, 천연기념물백서,570pp
27 박찬열,1994,야생조류의 서식에 적합한 도시환경림 조성 및 관리방안,서울대학교 대학원 석사 학위논문,73pp
28 백운기,이한수,김인규,한성우,이시완,송민정,이준우,2003,백두대간 만복대-시리봉 구간의 조류상과 서식지 선호도 및 관리방안에 관한 연구,한국환경생태학회지,16(4),409-420
29 송인주,진유리,2002,도시농경지의 경관생태학적 분석을 통한 생물다양성 증진 모델 -서울시를 대상으로-, 한국환경생태학회지, 16(3), 249-260
30 서울특별시,2000,도시생태개념의 도시계획에의 적용을 위한 서울시 비오톱 현황조사 및 생태도시 조성지침 수립 -1차년도 보고서-,서울특별시,245pp
31 송인주, 진유리, 2003, 서울시의 경관생태학적 분석을 통한 시설경작지 관리방안, 한국환경생태학회지, 17(1), 56-70
32 원병오, 1981, 동물편(조류생태), 한국동식물도감, 25, 문교부, 1126
33 이우신, 박찬열, 임신재, 2000, 한강지역 조류군집의 특성, 한국생태학회지, 23(3), 273-279
34 이원호, 장지덕, 최병인, 강성룡, 권기정, 2004, 울산지역 모자익 경관에서의 조류 다양성, 한국생태학회지, 27(6), 325-333
35 조우, 1995, 도시녹지의 생태적특성 분석과 자연성 증진을 위한 관리모형 -서울시를 중심으로-, 서울시립대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, 252pp
36 채진확, 구태회, 2003, 도시지역에서 번식기와 월동기 조류군집의 특성, 한국조류학회지, 10(1), 17-23
37 채진확, 구태회, 2004, 서울시의 조류다양성 증진을 위한 도시비오톱 특성 분석, 국토연구, 40, 87-100
38 한국경관생태연구회, 2001, 경관생태학, 동화기술, 서울, 420pp
39 허위행, 박성진, 임신재, 박용수, 최서윤, 이창배, 이우신, 2003, 한강 유역에서 서식환경에 따른 조류군집의 특성 차이, 한국환경생태학회지, 17(1), 83-91
40 Andren, H., 1994, Effects of habitat fragmentation on bird and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review, Oikos, 73, 355-366