1 |
Burnay, M., Hivonnet, J., & Raube, K. (2014). 'Soft diplomacy' and people-to-people dialogue between the EU and the PRC. European Foreign Affairs Review, 19(3), 35-55.
DOI
|
2 |
Bursens, P., & Deforche, J. (2010). Going beyond paradiplomacy? Adding historical institutionalism to account for regional foreign policy competences. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 5(1-2), 151-171.
DOI
|
3 |
Gallarotti, G. M. (2011). Soft power: what it is, why it's important, and the conditions for its effective use. Journal of Political Power, 4(1), 25-47.
DOI
|
4 |
Geert, H., & Hofstede, G. J. (1991/2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGaw-Hill.
|
5 |
Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55-77.
|
6 |
Henrikson, A. K. (2005). Niche diplomacy in the world public arena: the global 'corners' of Canada and Norway, In The New Public Diplomacy, edited by Melissen, J. 67-87. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
|
7 |
Holsti, O. R., & Rosenau, J. N. (1986). Consensus lost. Consensus regained?: foreign policy beliefs of American leaders, 1976-1980. International Studies Quarterly, 30(4), 375-409.
DOI
|
8 |
Huseynov, V. (2016). Soft power geopolitics: how does the diminishing utility of military power affect the Russia-West confrontation over the "Common Neighbourhood." Eastern Journal of European Studies, 7(2), 71-90.
|
9 |
Katzenstein, P. J., & Keohane, R. O. eds. (2007). Anti-Americanisms in world politics. Cornell University Press.
|
10 |
King, B. L. (1975). Japanese colonialism and Korean economic development 1910-1945. Asian Studies, 13(3), 1-21.
|
11 |
Kim, T. H. (2012). Paradigm shift in diplomacy: a conceptual model for Korea's new public diplomacy. Korea Observer,43(4), 527-555.
|
12 |
Lancaster, C. (2007). Foreign aid: diplomacy, development, domestic politics. Chicago and London: The University Of Chicago Press.
|
13 |
Lee, S. W. (2011). The theory and reality of soft power: practical approaches, in Public Diplomacy and Soft Power in East Asia, edited by Lee, S. J. & Melissen, Jan, 11-32. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
|
14 |
Lee, G., & Ayhan, A. (2015). Why do we need non-state actors in public diplomacy?: theoretical discussion of relational, networked and collaborative public diplomacy. Journal of International and Area Studies, 57-77.
|
15 |
Mabee, B. (2011). Historical institutionalism and foreign policy analysis: the origins of the National Security Council revisited. Foreign Policy Analysis, 7(1), 27-44.
DOI
|
16 |
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: the means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.
|
17 |
Nye, J. S. (2008). Public diplomacy in a changing world. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Mar., 2008, Vol. 616, 94-109.
DOI
|
18 |
Nye, J. S. (2011). Power and foreign policy. Journal of Political Power, 4(1), 9-24.
DOI
|
19 |
Ogunnubi, O., & Ettang, D. (2016). Communicating South Africa's soft power: agents, instruments and recipients. Communicatio, 42(3), 293-312.
DOI
|
20 |
Olsen, J. P. (2009). Change and continuity: an institutional approach to institutions of democratic government. European Political Science Review, 1(1), 3-32.
DOI
|
21 |
Oppermann, K., Brummer, K., and Willigen, N. V. (2017). Coalition governance and foreign policy decision-making. European Political Science, 16, 489-501.
DOI
|
22 |
Otmazgin, N. (2011). A tail that wags the dog? Cultural industry and cultural policy in Japan and South Korea. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 13(3), 307-325.
DOI
|
23 |
Perez, L. A. V. (2014). POP POWER: Pop Diplomacy for a Global Society. Luis Antonio Vidal Perez.
|
24 |
Reilly, B. (2015). Australia as a southern hemisphere 'soft power.' Australian Journal of International Affairs, 69(3), 253-265.
|
25 |
Peters, B. G. (2011). Institutional theory. The SAGE Handbook of Governance, 78-90.
|
26 |
Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & King, D. S. (2005). The politics of path dependency: political conflict in historical institutionalism. The Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1275-1300.
DOI
|
27 |
Rawnsley, G. (2012). Approaches to soft power and public diplomacy in China and Taiwan. Journal of International Communication, 18(2), 121-135.
|
28 |
Rosenau, J. N. (1968). Comparative foreign policy: fad, fantasy, or field?. International Studies Quarterly, 12(3), 296-329.
DOI
|
29 |
Rosenau, J. N. (1970). Foreign policy as adaptive behavior: some preliminary notes for a theoretical model. Comparative Politics, 2(3), 365-387.
DOI
|
30 |
Rotaru, V. (2018). Forced attraction? How Russia is instrumentalizing its soft power sources in the "near abroad." Problems of Post-Communism, 65(1), 37-48.
DOI
|
31 |
Rothman, S. B. (2011). Revising the soft power concept: what are the means and mechanisms of soft power?. Journal of Political Power, 4(1), 49-64.
DOI
|
32 |
Sguazzin, A. (2022, June 13). China surpasses US in eyes of young Africans, survey shows. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-12/china-surpasses-us-in-the-eyes-of-youngafricans-survey-shows (retrieved on August 7, 2022)
|
33 |
Tella, O. (2016). AFRICOM: hard or soft power initiative?. African Security Review, 25(4), 393-406.
DOI
|
34 |
Wojczewski, T. (2019). Trump, populism, and American foreign policy. Foreign Policy Analysis, 16(3), 292-311.
DOI
|
35 |
Thelen, K. (2010). Beyond comparative statics: historical institutional approaches to stability and change in the political economy of labor. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis. edited by Morgan, G. et al. 42-62. New York: Oxford University Press.
|
36 |
Welzel, C., & Inglehart, R. (2001). Human development as a general theory of social change: a multi-level and cross-cultural perspective. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fur Sozialforschung gGmbH (WZB), Reichpietschufer 50, Discussion Paper FS III, 1-36.
|
37 |
Whitney, C. B., & Shambaugh, D. (2009). Soft power in Asia: results of a 2008 multinational survey of public opinion. Chicago Council on Global Affairs in partnership with EAI.
|
38 |
김영호 (2014). 대한민국의 건국외교: 정부 승인과 외교 기반 구축. <한국정치외교사논총>, 35 집 2 호, 43-72.
DOI
|
39 |
김태수 (2007). 프랑스 대통령제의 특징, 변천 그리고 운영의 메커니즘. <유럽연구>, 25 집 3 호, 135-153.
DOI
|
40 |
김태환 (2020). <한국 정책공공외교의 진호와 방향성>. 한국공공외교학회 창립학술회의 발제집, 50-76.
|
41 |
윤기웅.김병규 (2014). <공공외교의 성과 및 성과에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석 '아세안 페스티벌' 사업을 중심으로>. 한국정부학회 학술발표논문집, 300-323.
|
42 |
이덕환 (2015). 불통.불신.비효율의 늪에 빠져버린 국정운영. <철학과 현실>, 106 호, 99-118.
|
43 |
정동훈 (2013). 외교제도사 연구 제언. 한국역사연구회 <역사와 현실>, 89 권, 21-39.
|
44 |
전영상.이진복 (2012). 위기 상황에서의 정보은폐에 관한 한.일 비교연구: 일본 후쿠시마 원전사고와 한국 고리 원전사고 사례를 중심으로. <아시아연구>, 15 집 2 호, 185-214.
|
45 |
조기숙 외 (2016). <한국형 공공외교 평가모델>. 이화공공외교총서 제 1 권. 이화여자대학교공공외교센터 엮음. 이화여자대학교출판문화원.
|
46 |
Broom, G. M., & Sha, B. L. (2013). Cutlip and Center's effective public relations. 11th edition. Boston: Pearson.
|
47 |
홍기원 (2014). 이명박 정부 국가브랜드정책의 평가: 문화정책의 상징적 활용의 관점에서. <현대사회와 행정>, 24 권 2 호, 82-102.
|
48 |
Beeson, M., & Higgott, R. (2005). Hegemony, institutionalism and US foreign policy: theory and practice in comparative historical perspective. Third World Quarterly, 26(7), 1173-1188.
DOI
|