1 |
Collins, S. D., DeWitt, J. R., & LeFebvre, R. K. (2019). Hashtag diplomacy: Twitter as a tool for engaging in public diplomacy and promoting U.S. foreign policy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 15(2), 78-96. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-019-00119-5
DOI
|
2 |
Williams Camus, J. T. (2009). Metaphors of cancer in scientific popularization articles in the British press. Discourse Studies, 11(4), 465-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609105220
DOI
|
3 |
Williams, R., & Williams, R. H. (1977). Marxism and Literature (Vol. 392). Oxford Paperbacks.
|
4 |
Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations. John Wiley & Sons.
|
5 |
Xinhua News Agency. (2013, August 21). Tell a Good Story of China (in Chinese). https://www.chinanews.com.cn/gn/2013/08-21/5187666.shtml?t=1488039105998
|
6 |
Zaharna, R. S. (2005, April). The network paradigm of strategic public diplomacy. Foreign Policy in Focus, 10(1), 1-4. Retrieved April 7, 2021, from https://www.american.edu/soc/faculty/upload/network-paradigm.pdf
|
7 |
Al-Dabbagh, Z. S. (2020). The role of decision-maker in crisis management: A qualitative study using grounded theory (COVID -19 pandemic crisis as a model). Journal of Public Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2186
DOI
|
8 |
Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Sage.
|
9 |
Vaast, E. & Urquhart, C. (2017). Building Grounded Theory with Social Media Data. In: Routledge Companion to Qualitative Research in Organization Studies. Routledge.
|
10 |
Mutz, D. C., & Mondak, J. J. (2006). The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 140-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00376.x
DOI
|
11 |
Adams, A., & McCorkindale, T. (2013). Dialogue and transparency: A content analysis of how the 2012 presidential candidates used Twitter. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 357-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.016
DOI
|
12 |
Ahmed, S. (2013). The cultural politics of emotion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203700372
DOI
|
13 |
Karlsen, R., & Enjolras, B. (2016). Styles of social media campaigning and influence in a hybrid political communication system: Linking candidate survey data with Twitter data. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 338-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216645335
DOI
|
14 |
Gruzd, A., & Roy, J. (2014). Investigating political polarization on Twitter: A Canadian perspective. Policy & Internet, 6(1), 28-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI354
DOI
|
15 |
Baldwin-Philippi, J. (2018). The technological performance of Populism. New Media & Society, 21(2), 376-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797591
DOI
|
16 |
Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation: pluralism, complexity, and democracy. McGraw Hill Book Co. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453703029001835
DOI
|
17 |
Brady, Anne-Marie. (2009). Marketing dictatorship: propaganda and thought work in contemporary China. Lanham, MD: The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group.
|
18 |
Aronczyk, M. (2013). Branding the Nation: The Global Business of National Identity. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199752164.001.0001
DOI
|
19 |
Brady, Anne-Marie. (2015). China's foreign propaganda machine. Journal of Democracy, 26(4), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0056
DOI
|
20 |
Bucy, E. P., Foley, J. M., Lukito, J., Doroshenko, L., Shah, D. V., Pevehouse, J. C., & Wells, C. (2020). performing populism: Trump's transgressive debate style and the dynamics of Twitter response. New Media & Society, 22(4), 634-658. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893984
DOI
|
21 |
Denzin, N. K. (1985). Emotion as lived experience. Symbolic Interaction, 8(2), 223-240. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1985.8.2.223
DOI
|
22 |
Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society. The information age: Economy, society, and culture, Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
|
23 |
Charmaz, K.C. (2006a) Grounded theory. In G. Ritzer (Ed.): Encyclopaedia of sociology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
|
24 |
Charmaz, K.C. (2006b) Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
|
25 |
Bjola, C., & Jiang, L. (2015). Social media and public diplomacy: A comparative analysis of the digital diplomatic strategies of the E.U., the U.S., and Japan in China. In Digital Diplomacy (pp. 85-102). Routledge.
|
26 |
Chen, W., Tu, F., & Zheng, P. (2017). A transnational networked public sphere of air pollution: Analysis of a Twitter network of PM2.5 from the risk society perspective. Information, Communication & Society, 20(7), 1005-1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1303076
DOI
|
27 |
Fisher, A., Arsenault, A., & Zaharna, R. S. (Eds.). (2013). Relational, Networked, and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy: The Connective Mindshift. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203082430
DOI
|
28 |
Foreign Ministry of the People's Republic of China. (2020, January 13). Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Geng Shuang's Regular Press Conference on January 13, 2020. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/2511_665403/t1731707.shtml
|
29 |
Bryant, A. and Charmaz, K. (2007). Grounded theory research: methods and practices. In: A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 1-28). Sage.
|
30 |
Chamberlain-Salaun, J. (2015). Consumers and the social world of health care: outsiders in the expert's world: a grounded theory study (Doctoral dissertation, James Cook University).
|
31 |
Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in website comments. Journal of Communication, 64, 658-579. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12104
DOI
|
32 |
Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
|
33 |
Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2017). Metaphors for the war (or race) against climate change. Environmental Communication, 11(6), 769-783. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111
DOI
|
34 |
Frenda, S. (2018). The role of sarcasm in hate speech. A multilingual perspective. In e Doctoral Symposium of the XXXIV International Conference of the Spanish Society for Natural Language Processing (SEPLN 2018) (pp. 13-17).
|
35 |
Gibbs Jr, R. W. (2013). Metaphoric cognition as a social activity: Dissolving the divide between metaphor in thought and communication. Metaphor and the Social World, 3(1), 54-76. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.3.1.03gib
DOI
|
36 |
Hall, S. (1973). Encoding and decoding in the media discourse. stenciled paper, 7, 90-103.
|
37 |
Hardman, H. (2013). The validity of a grounded theory approach to research on democratization. Qualitative Research, 13(6), 635-649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112445526
DOI
|
38 |
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. New York, NY: Pantheon Book.
|
39 |
Hayden, C. (2013). Logics of narrative and networks in US public diplomacy: Communication power and US strategic engagement. Journal of International Communication, 19(2), 196-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2013.775070
DOI
|
40 |
Nye, J. (2011) The Future of Power, New York: Public Affairs.
|
41 |
Onuf, N. (2013). Making sense, making worlds: Constructivism in social theory and international relations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203096710
DOI
|
42 |
Kelley, J. R. (2010). The new diplomacy: evolution of a revolution. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 21(2), 286-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2010.482474
DOI
|
43 |
Shepherd, T., Harvey, A., Jordan, T., Srauy, S., & Miltner, K. (2015). Histories of hating. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603997
DOI
|
44 |
Halaweh, M. (2012). Integration of grounded theory and case study: an exemplary application from e-commerce security perception research. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), 13(1): 31-51.
|
45 |
Huang, Z. A., & Arifon, O. (2018). La diplomatie publique chinoise sur Twitter: la fabrique d'unepolyphonie harmonieuse [Chinese public diplomacy on Twitter: Creating a harmonious polyphony]. Hermes, La Revue, 81, 45-53. http://doi.org/10.3917/herm.081.0045
DOI
|
46 |
Huang, Z., & Wang, R. (2019). Building a Network to "Tell China Stories Well": Chinese Diplomatic Communication Strategies on Twitter. International Journal of Communication, 13, 24. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/11221
|
47 |
Jia, R., & Li, W. (2020). Public diplomacy networks: China's public diplomacy communication practices in Twitter during Two Sessions. Public Relations Review, 46(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101818
DOI
|
48 |
Khatib, L., William, D., & Michael, T. (2011, January 4). Public Diplomacy 2.0: An Exploratory Case Study of the US Digital Outreach Team. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1734850
|
49 |
Lee, S. T. (2021). Vaccine diplomacy: nation branding and China's COVID-19 soft power play. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00224-4
DOI
|
50 |
Hopf, T. (2002). The social construction of international politics: identities & foreign policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Cornell University Press.
|
51 |
Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2011, September). Six provocations for big data. In A decade in internet time: Symposium on the dynamics of the internet and society.
|
52 |
Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
DOI
|
53 |
Pousti, H., Urquhart, C., Burstein, F., & Linger, H. (2013). Methodological implications of social media as a research setting for IS healthcare studies: reflections from a grounded theory study. In ACIS 2013: Information systems: Transforming the Future: Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1-12). RMIT University.
|
54 |
Zhong, X., & Lu, J. (2013). Public diplomacy meets social media: A study of the US Embassy's blogs and micro-blogs. Public Relations Review, 39(5), 542-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.002
DOI
|
55 |
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
|
56 |
Taylor, A. (2014). The people's platform: Taking back power and culture in the digital age. Metropolitan Books.
|
57 |
Tie, Y. C., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. Sage Open Medicine, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118822927
DOI
|
58 |
Urquhart, C. & Vaast, E. (2012). Building social media theory from case studies: a new frontier for IS research. 33rd international conference on information systems. Orlando, USA (pp. 2705-2723). Retrieved April 7, 2021, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.659.1885&rep=rep1&type=pdf
|
59 |
Vaast, E. & Walsham, G. (2013). Grounded theorizing for electronically-mediated social contexts. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 9-25. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.26
DOI
|
60 |
Edwards, S., Birks, M., Chapman, Y., & Yates, K. (2018). Bringing together the 'threads of care' in possible miscarriage for women, their partners, and nurses in non-metropolitan EDs. Collegian, 25(3), 293-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2017.09.004
DOI
|
61 |
Huang, Z., & Wang, R. (2021). Exploring China's Digitalization of Public Diplomacy on Weibo and Twitter: A Case Study of the U.S.-China Trade War. International Journal of Communication, 15, 28. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/15105
|
62 |
Leeker, M., Schipper, I., & Beyes, T. (2017). Performativity, performance studies, and digital cultures. In Performing the Digital (pp. 9-18). Transcript-Verlag. Retrieved from https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/31479/627661.pdf?sequence=1#page=22
|
63 |
Marinho, J. (2020, August 7). China in Africa (2019): Facebook & Twitter as Part of Public Diplomacy. Retrieved December 7, 2021, from https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/129013/2/415437.pdf
|
64 |
Melissen, J. (Ed.). (2005). The new public diplomacy (pp. 292-31). Palgrave Macmillan.
|
65 |
Hartig, F. (2016). How China understands public diplomacy: The importance of national image for national interests. International Studies Review, 18, 655-680. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viw007
DOI
|
66 |
Christensen, C. (2013). @ Sweden: Curating a nation on Twitter. Popular Communication, 11(1), 30-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2013.751855
DOI
|
67 |
Creamer, E. G. (2018). Enlarging the conceptualization of mixed-method approaches to grounded theory with intervention research. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 919-934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218772642
DOI
|
68 |
Gary, D. R. (2015). To Know Us is to Love Us: Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting in Contemporary Russia and China. Politics, 35(3-4), 273-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12104
DOI
|
69 |
Golbeck, J., Grimes, J. M., & Rogers, A. (2010). Twitter use by the U.S. Congress. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61, 1612-1621. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21344
DOI
|
70 |
Halaweh, M. (2018). Integrating social media and grounded theory in a research methodology: a possible road map. Business Information Review, 35(4), 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382118809168
DOI
|
71 |
Hua, C. Y. (2019). Reach the moral heights and enhance international discourse power. Study Times. https://www.ccps.gov.cn/xylt/201907/t20190712_133103.shtml
|
72 |
Huang, Z. A., & Wang, R. (2019b). The new "cat" of the Internet: China's panda diplomacy on Twitter. In F. Frandsen, W. Johansen, R. Tench, & S. Romenti (Eds.), Big ideas in public relations research and practice (pp. 69-85). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-391420190000004006
DOI
|
73 |
Lai, L. S., & To, W. M. (2015). Content analysis of social media: A grounded theory approach. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 16(2), 138.
|
74 |
Lindsley, D. B. (1951). Emotion. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 473-516). Wiley.
|
75 |
Martin, V. B., Scott, C., Brennen, B., & Durham, M. G. (2018). What Is Grounded Theory Good For?. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018759676
DOI
|
76 |
Mills, J., Birks, M. & Hoare, K. J. (2014). Grounded theory. In: J. Mills & M. Birks (Eds.), Qualitative methodology: a practical guide (pp. 107-121). Sage.
|
77 |
Pamment, J. (2013). New Public Diplomacy in the 21st Century. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203096734
DOI
|
78 |
Livingstone, S. (2016, January 7). Assessing China's plan to build internet power. China File. https://www.chinafile.com/reporting-opinion/media/assessing-chinas-plan-build-internet-power
|
79 |
Enli, G. S., & Skogerbo, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centered politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, Communication & Society, 16, 757-774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
DOI
|
80 |
Pain, P., & Masullo Chen, G. (2019). The president is in: Public opinion and the presidential use of Twitter. Social Media+ Society, 5(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119855143
DOI
|
81 |
Peterson, P. G., Sieg, J., Bloomgarden, K., Grunwald, H., Morey, D. E., & Telhami, S. (2002). Public Diplomacy: A Strategy for Reform: A Report of an Independent Task Force on Public Diplomacy Sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations. Washington, DC: Council on Foreign Relations.
|
82 |
Poole, E., Giraud, E. H., & de Quincey, E. (2021). Tactical interventions in online hate speech: The case of# stopIslam. New Media & Society, 23(6), 1415-1442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820903319
DOI
|
83 |
Shahin, S., & Huang, Q. (2019). Friend, Ally, or Rival? Twitter Diplomacy as "Technosocial" Performance of National Identity. International Journal of Communication, 13, 19. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/10921
|
84 |
Sharp, P. (2005). Revolutionary states, outlaw regimes, and the techniques of public diplomacy. In The new public diplomacy (pp. 106-123). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931_6
DOI
|
85 |
Settle, J. E. (2018). Frenemies: How social media polarizes America. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108560573
DOI
|
86 |
Shumba, E. (2021). An investigation into 'Wolf Warrior' diplomacy in Africa via Twitter and Facebook at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. South African Journal of International Affairs, 28(3), 471-483. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2021.1976267
DOI
|
87 |
Slaughter, A. M. (2009). America's edge: Power in the networked century. Foreign affairs, 94-113. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20699436
|
88 |
Schliebs, M., Bailey, H., Bright, J., & Howard, P. N. (2021). China's public diplomacy operations: understanding engagement and inauthentic amplifications of PRC diplomats on Facebook and Twitter [working paper]. Programme on Democracy and Technology, Oxford University. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:427320a1-c677-40d4-b4a5-1759e563e7ed
|