Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.23045/jpd.2021.1.1.005

Information Intervention: A Taxonomy & Typology for Government Communication  

Arceneaux, Phillip (Miami University)
Publication Information
Journal of Public Diplomacy / v.1, no.1, 2021 , pp. 5-35 More about this Journal
Abstract
Where government communication in the early 20th century fell under the umbrella term, "propaganda," the post-WWII era saw a paradigm fracture into public affairs for domestic audiences, public diplomacy for foreign audiences, and psychological operations for hostile audiences. The continued diffusion of the Internet, however, has blurred such distinctions, mending this fractured paradigm. Based on in-depth interviews, this study typologizes government communication to contextualize how various tactics functions within the 21st century digital media ecology, through an "Information Intervention" taxonomy. In an age where state-sponsored disinformation and computational propaganda are tantamount threats, this paper elucidates the field's fundamental concepts by articulating who communicates with what audience, in what manner, with what intent, and with what desired outcomes.
Keywords
information politics; public diplomacy; information operations; propaganda;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Dupuy, K., & Rustad, S. A. (2018). Trends in armed conflict, 1046-2017. Peace Research Institute Oslo. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Dupuy%2C%20Rustad-%20Trends%20in%20Armed%20Conflict%2C%201946%E2%80%932017%2C%20Conflict%20Trends%205-2018.pdf
2 Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55-77.   DOI
3 Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, Canada: Aldine Transaction.
4 Global Engagement Center. (2020). Special Report: Pillars of Russia's disinformation and propaganda ecosystem. U.S. Department of State. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Pillars-of-Russia%E2%80%99s-Disinformation-and-Propaganda-Ecosystem_08-04-20.pdf
5 Kaufman, E. (2002). A broadcasting strategy to win media wars. The Washington Quarterly, 25(2), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1162/01636600252820171.   DOI
6 Kothari, A., & Tsakarestou, B. (2019). 'Hack the camp': An entrepreneurial public diplomacy and social intervention initiative to address the refugee crisis in Greece. International Communication Gazette, 83(1), 9-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519883508   DOI
7 Lennon, C. (2015). Detainees in the global war on terrorism aboard Guantanamo Bay. Touro Law Review, 31(4), 1013-1041.
8 Manor, I. (2021). Russia's digital diplomacy: The good, the bad and the satirical. Russland-Analysen, 1(398), 2-6. https://doi.org/10.31205/RA.398.01   DOI
9 Pisarska, K. (2016). The domestic dimension of public diplomacy: Evaluating success through civil engagement. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
10 Rawnsley, G. D. (1996). Radio diplomacy and propaganda: The BBC and VOA in international politics, 1956-64. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
11 Isaacson, W. (2010, September 28). America's voice must be credible and must be heard. Celebrating 60 Years of RFE. http://docs.rferl.org/en-US/2010/09/29/100928%20rferlisaacson.pdf
12 Cooper, V. A. (2017). Media development, DAC, and China: Different approaches, same public diplomacy. Journal of Media Business Studies, 14(1), 25-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2017.1292714   DOI
13 Arceneaux, P. (2019, July 22). Information intervention: The mending of a fractured paradigm. USC Center for Public Diplomacy., from https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/information-intervention-mending-fractured-paradigm.
14 Bazov, G. (2014, July 10). Eyewitness account of atrocities by Ukrainian Nazi Banderovtsy in Slavyansk. Slavyandgrad. https://slavyangrad.org/2014/07/10/atrocities-in-slavyansk/.
15 Cowan, D., & Cook, C. (2018). What's in a name? Psychological operations versus military information support operations and an analysis of organizational change. Military Review. Available at: https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/OnlineExclusive/2018-OLE/Mar/PSYOP/.
16 Bischof, A., & Jurgens, Z. (2015). Voices of freedom - western interference? 60 years of Radio Free Europe. Gottingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
17 Bjola, C., & Manor, I. (2018). Revisiting Putnam's two-level game theory in the digital age: Domestic digital diplomacy and the Iran nuclear deal. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 31(1), 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1476836   DOI
18 Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, England: Sage.
19 Chong, D., & Druckman, J. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x   DOI
20 Cull, N. J. (2008). Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311952   DOI
21 Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467.   DOI
22 Douek, E. (2020, July 2). What does "coordinated inauthentic behavior" actually mean? Slate. https://slate.com/technology/2020/07/coordinated-inauthentic-behavior-facebook-twitter.html
23 Roose, K. (2018, July 19). U.S.-funded broadcaster directed ads to Americans. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/19/technology/facebook-ads-propaganda.html
24 Nemr, C., & Gangware, W. (2019). Weapons of mass distraction: Foreign state-sponsored disinformation in the digital age. U.S. Department of State. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Weapons-of-Mass-Distraction-Foreign-State-SponsoredDisinformation-in-the-Digital-Age.pdf
25 Szostek, J. (2017). The power and limits of Russia's strategic narrative in Ukraine: The role of linkage. Perspectives on Politics, 15(2), 379-395. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700007X.   DOI
26 Walker, C., & Ludwig, J. (2017). From 'soft power' to 'sharp power': Rising authoritarian influence in the democratic world. In J. P. Cardenal, J. Kucharcyzk, G. Meseznikov, & G. Plaschova. Sharp power: Rising Authoritarian Influence. International Forum for Democratic Studies. https://www.ned.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Sharp-Power-RisingAuthoritarian-Influence-Full-Report.pdf
27 Wardle, C., & Derakshshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe Report DGI(2017)09. https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-researc/168076277c
28 Euromaidan. (2015, August 25). Monument to Russian media fakes unveiled in Ukraine. Euromaidan Press. Retrieved on June 19, 2018, from http://euromaidanpress.com/2015/08/25/monument-to-russian-media-fakes-unveiled-in-ukraine/.
29 Fitzpatrick, K. R. (2007). Advancing the new public diplomacy: A public relations perspective. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2(3), 187-211. https://doi.org/10.1163/187119007X240497   DOI
30 Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (2009). Introduction: Expert interviews - an introduction to a new methodological debate. In A. Bogner, B. Littig, & W. Menz (Eds.), Interviewing Experts, (pp. 1-16). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
31 Powell, A. (2012, March 30). Pinker explains 'The Long Peace.' The Harvard Gazette. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2012/03/pinker-explains-the-long-peace/
32 Holbrooke, R. (2001, October 28). Get the message out. The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2010/12/13/AR2010121305410.html
33 Mattiacci, E., & Jones, B. T. (2020). Restoring legitimacy: Public diplomacy campaigns during civil wars. International Studies Quarterly, 64(4), 867-787. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa065   DOI
34 Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York, NY: Perseus Book Group.
35 Powers, S., & Samuel-Azran, T. (2015). Conceptualizing international broadcasting as information intervention. In G. J. Golan, S. Yang, & D. F. Kinsey (Eds). International public relations and public diplomacy: Communication and engagement (pp. 245-166). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
36 Richards, D. (1996). Elite interviewing: Approaches and pitfalls. Politics, 16(3), 199-204.   DOI
37 Shapiro, J. N., Nedashkovskaya, M. P., & Oledan, J. G. (2020). Collaborative models for understanding influence operations: Lessons from defense research. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/Shapiro_etal_InfluenceOps_Defense_Research.pdf
38 Storie, L. K. (2018). Relationship cultivation in public diplomacy: A qualitative study of relational antecedents and cultivation strategies. Journal of Public Relations Research, 29(6), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1437443   DOI
39 Cowan, G., & Arsenault, A. (2008). Moving from monologue to dialogue to collaboration: The three layers of public diplomacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 10-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311863   DOI
40 Bryant, J., & Miron, D. (2004). Theory and research in mass communication. Journal ofCommunication, 54(4), 662-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02650.x   DOI
41 Cyr, D., Head, M. M., Lim, E., & Stibe, A. (2018). Using the elaboration likelihood model to examine online persuasion through website design. Information & Management, 55(7), 807-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.03.009   DOI
42 Donovan, J., Greene, J., & Kaye, D. (2020, August 6). Combating online misinformation. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/event/combating-online-misinformation
43 Ekici, B., & Akbulut, A. (2015). Revisiting asymmetric psychological warfare: Why the U.S. lost the battle of images after Iraq? Review of International Law & Politics, 11(44), 33-69.
44 Jordan, T. (2015). Information politics: Liberation and exploitation in the digital age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45 Gaffney, A M., Tomory, J. J., & Gold, G. J. (2016). The endorsement of commentator opinion: A case of manufactured consent. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(2), 194-202.   DOI
46 Glassman, J. K. (2010, March 10). How to win the war of ideas. Foreign Policy. http://foreignpolicy.com/2010/03/10/how-to-win-the-war-of-ideas/
47 Hopkins, A. E. (2015). Government public relations: Public diplomacy or propaganda? Inquiries Journal, 7(3), 1-3. Available at: http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1012/government-public-relations-public-diplomacy-or-propaganda.
48 Just, T. (2015). Public diplomacy and domestic engagement: The Jewish revival in Poland. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 11(4), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2015.11   DOI
49 Kearney, M. G. (2007). The Prohibition of Propaganda for War in International Law. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford Press.
50 Martelle, M. (2018, August 13). Joint Task Force ARES and Operation GLOWING SYMPHONY: Cyber Command's Internet war against ISIL. National Security Archive. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/cyber-vault/2018-08-13/joint-task-forceares-operation-glowing-symphony-cyber-commands-internet-war-against-isil
51 Riordan, S. (2017, June 21). Stop inventing "new diplomacies." USC Center for Public Diplomacy. https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/stop-inventing-new-diplomacies
52 Lakin, S. (2019, September 5). Lessons from the UN peacekeeping mission in Rwanda, 25 years after the genocide it failed to stop. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/lessons-from-the-un-peacekeeping-mission-in-rwanda-25-years-after-the-genocide-it-failed-to-stop-122174
53 Pamment, J. (2014). Articulating influence: Toward a research agenda for interpreting the evaluation of soft power, public diplomacy and nation brands. Public Relations Review, 40(1), pp. 50-59. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.11.019   DOI
54 Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Mothes, C., Johnson, B. K., Westerwick, A., & Donsbach, W. (2015). Political online information searching in Germany and the United States: Confirmation bias, source credibility, and attitude impacts. Journal of Communication, 65(3), 489-511. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12154   DOI
55 la Cour, C. (2020). Theorising digital disinformation in international relations. International Politics, 57(1), 704-723. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00215-x   DOI
56 MacFarquhar, N. (2016). A powerful Russian weapon: The spread of false stories. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/29/world/europe/russia-sweden-disinformation.html
57 Manor, I. (2020). How external shocks alter digital diplomacy's trajectory. USC Center for Public Diplomacy Blog. https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/how-external-shocks-alter-digital-diplomacys-trajectory
58 Uttaro, R. A. (1982). The voices of America in international radio propaganda. Law and Contemporary Problems, 45(4), 103-112.   DOI
59 Wanless, A., & Pamment, J. (2019). How do you define a problem like influence? Journal of Information Warfare, 18(3), 1-14. Available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/files/2020-How_do_you_define_a_problem_like_influence.pdf.
60 Walker, C. (2016). The authoritarian threat: The hijacking of "soft power". Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 49-63. Available at: https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-authoritarian-threat-the-hijacking-of-soft-power/.   DOI
61 Woolley, S. C., & Howard, P. N. (2017). Computational propaganda worldwide: Executive summary. Computational Propaganda Research Project, Oxford Internet Institute. https://demtech.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/89/2017/06/Casestudies-ExecutiveSummary.pdf
62 Walker, P. (2018, December 10). Foreign Office investigates reports that state-funded body targeted Corbyn. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/dec/10/foreign-office-investigates-report-state-funded-body-targeted-corbyn