Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2017.1.1.017

Stiffness Comparison of Tissue Phantoms using Optical Coherence Elastography without a Load Cell  

Chae, Yu-Gyeong (Medical Device Development Center, Osong Medical Innovation Foundation)
Park, Eun-Kee (Innovative Biomedical Technology Research Center)
Jeon, Min Yong (Department of Physics, Chung Nam National University)
Jeon, Byeong-Hwan (School of Sports and Health, Kyungsung University)
Ahn, Yeh-Chan (Innovative Biomedical Technology Research Center)
Publication Information
Current Optics and Photonics / v.1, no.1, 2017 , pp. 17-22 More about this Journal
Abstract
Mechanical property of tissue is closely related to diseases such as breast cancer, prostate cancer, cirrhosis of the liver, and atherosclerosis. Therefore measurement of tissue mechanical property is important for a better diagnosis. Ultrasound elastography has been developed as a diagnostic modality for a number of diseases that maps mechanical property of tissue. Optical coherence elastography (OCE) has a higher spatial resolution than ultrasound elastography. OCE, therefore, could be a great help for early diagnosis. In this study, we made tissue phantoms and measured their compressive moduli with a rheometer measuring the response to applied force. Uniaxial strain of the tissue phantom was also measured with OCE by using cross-correlation of speckles and compared with the results from the rheometer. In order to compare stiffness of tissue phantoms by OCE, the applied force should be measured in addition to the strain. We, however, did not use a load cell that directly measures the applied force for each sample. Instead, we utilized one silicone film (called as reference phantom) for all OCE measurements that indirectly indicated the amount of the applied force by deformation. Therefore, all measurements were based on displacement, which was natural and effective for image-based elastography such as OCE.
Keywords
Mechanical Property; Optical coherence tomography; Optical coherence elastography; Tissue phantom;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 M. M. Doyley, "Model-based elastography: a survey of approaches to the inverse elasticity problem," Phys. Med. Biol., 57 (3), R35-R73, 2012.   DOI
2 W. Drexler, "Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography", Journal of Biomedical Optics, 9, 47-74, 2004.   DOI
3 V. M. Gelikonov, G. V. Gelikonov, and P. A. Shilyagin, "Linear-Wavenumber Spectrometer for High-Speed Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography", Optics and Spectroscopy, 106, 459-465, 2009.   DOI
4 J. M. Schmitt, "OCT elastography: imaging microscopic deformation and stain of tissue", Optics Express, 3, 199-211, 1998.   DOI
5 X. Liang, A. L. Oldenburg, V. Crecea, E. J. Chaney, and S. A. Boppart, "Optical micro-scale mapping of dynamic biomechanical tissue properties", Optics Express, 16, 11052-11065, 2008.   DOI
6 Y. Gui, S. K. Gil, and G. H. Ryu, "Effects of extrusion condition on the physicochemical properties of extruded red ginseng", Preventive Nutrition and Food Science, 17, 203-209, 2012.   DOI
7 X. Liang, V. Crecea, and S. A. Boppart, "Dynamic optical coherence elastography: A review", Journal of innovative optical health sciences, 3, 4, 221-233, 2010.   DOI
8 B. F. Kennedy, K. M. Kennedy, and D. D. Sampson, "A Review of Optical Coherence Elastography: Fundamentals, Techniques and Prospects", IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 20, 2, 272-288, 2014.   DOI
9 K. J. Parker, M. M. Doyley, and D. J. Rubens, "Imaging the elastic properties of tissue : the 20 year perspective", Physics in Medicine and Biology, 56, R1-R29, 2011   DOI
10 Y. K. Mariappan, K. J Glaser, and R. L. Ehman, "Magnetic resonance elastography: A review", Clinical Anatomy, 23, 497-511, 2010.   DOI
11 B. F. Kennedy, X. Liang, S. G. Adie, D. K. Gerstmann, B. C. Quirk, S. A. Boppart, and D. D. Sampson, "In vivo three-dimensional optical coherence elastography", Optics Express, 19, 6623-6634, 2011.   DOI