Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Fully Porous-Coated Long Stem - a Minimum 5 Years Follow up - |
Cho, Yoon-Je
(Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University)
Kwak, Sang-Joon (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University) Chun, Young-Soo (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University) Rhyu, Kee-Hyung (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University) Ko, Taeg-Su (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University) Yoo, Myung-Chul (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University) |
1 | Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG. The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:55-62. DOI |
2 | Mulroy WF, Harris WH. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:325-30. DOI |
3 | Pellicci PM, Wilson PD Jr, Sledge CB, et al. Long-term results of revision total hip replacement. A follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:513-6. DOI |
4 | Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;369:230-42. DOI |
5 | Weeden SH, Paprosky WG. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17 Suppl:134-7. DOI |
6 | Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM, Wilson PD Jr, Ranawat CS. Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:1074-85. DOI |
7 | Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, Simon JP, Slooff TJ, Timperley AJ. Contained morselized allograft in revision total hip arthroplasty. Surgical technique. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:717-25. |
8 | Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:203-9. |
9 | Buttaro MA, Mayor MB, Van Citters D, Piccaluga F. Fatigue fracture of a proximally modular, distally tapered fluted implant with diaphyseal fixation. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:780-3. DOI ScienceOn |
10 | Kim YH. Cemented revision hip arthroplasty using strut and impacted cancellous allografts. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:726-32. DOI ScienceOn |
11 | Oakes DA, Cabanela ME. Impaction bone grafting for revision hip arthroplasty: biology and clinical applications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:620-8. DOI |
12 | Schreurs BW, Arts JJ, Verdonschot N, Buma P, Slooff TJ, Gardeniers JW. Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88-A Suppl:259-74. |
13 | Sierra RJ, Charity J, Tsiridis E, Timperley JA, Gie GA. The use of long cemented stems for femoral impaction grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1330-6. DOI ScienceOn |
14 | Blackley HR, Davis AM, Hutchison CR, Gross AE. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. A nine to fifteenyear follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:346-54. DOI |
15 | Gross AE, Hutchison CR. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:313-7. DOI ScienceOn |
16 | Haentjens P, De Boeck H, Opdecam P. Proximal femoral replacement prosthesis for salvage of failed hip arthroplasty: complications in a 2-11 year follow-up study in 19 elderly patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67:37-42. DOI |
17 | Parvizi J, Sim FH. Proximal femoral replacements with megaprostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:169-75. DOI |
18 | Moreland JR, Bernstein ML. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;319:141-50. |
19 | Ornstein E, Atroshi I, Franzen H, Johnsson R, Sandquist P, Sundberg M. Results of hip revision using the Exeter stem, impacted allograft bone, and cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;389:126-33. DOI ScienceOn |
20 | Gustilo RB, Bechtold JE, Giacchetto J, Kyle RF. Rationale, experience and results of long-stem femoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;249:159-68. |
21 | Hellman EJ, Capello WN, Feinberg JR. Nonunion of extended trochanteric osteotomies in impaction grafting femoral revisions. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:945-9. DOI ScienceOn |
22 | Hostner J, Hultmark P, Karrholm J, Malchau H, Tveit M. Impaction technique and graft treatment in revisions of the femoral component: laboratory studies and clinical validation. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:76-82. |
23 | Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;259:107-28. |
24 | Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG. 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:839-47. DOI ScienceOn |