Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.51457/kjcp.2022.12.6.2.45

The Effects of Coaching Leadership on Performance Appraisal Effectiveness: Mediating Effect of Negative Feedback Seeking Behavior and Moderated Mediating Effect of Psychological Safety  

Jung Hee Lee (Department of Psychology, Kwangwoon University)
Jin Kook Tak (Department of Psychology, Kwangwoon University)
Publication Information
The Korean Journal of Coaching Psychology / v.6, no.2, 2022 , pp. 45-73 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the mediating effect of negative feedback-seeking behavior in the relationship between the effect of coaching leadership on performance appraisal effectiveness and coaching leadership's performance appraisal effectiveness, and the moderating effect of psychological safety in the effect of coaching leadership on negative feedback-seeking behavior. is to reveal For this purpose, data from 300 office workers in various domestic companies were collected through an online survey, and the data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 and Macro. The results of this study are as follows. First, the mediating effect of negative feedback seeking behavior was confirmed in the relationship between coaching leadership and performance appraisal effectiveness. Second, it was verified that psychological safety had a moderating effect in the relationship between coaching leadership and negative feedback-seeking behavior. Third, the moderated mediating effect was found to be insignificant. Finally, in this study, the academic significance, implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research were discussed.
Keywords
coaching leadership; performance appraisal effectiveness; negative feedback seeking behavior; psychological safety;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 VandeWalle, D., & Cummings, L. L. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. Journal of applied psychology, 82(3), 390.
2 Walumbwa, F. O. & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader Personality Traits and Employee Voice Behavior: Mediating Roles of Ethical Leadership and Work Group Psychological Safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5): 1275-1286.   DOI
3 Whitaker, B. G., and Levy, P. (2012), Linking feedback quality and goal orientation to feedback seeking and job performance, Human Performance, 25(2), 159-178.
4 Whitmore, J.(2010), Coaching for performance: growing human potential and purpose: the principles and practice of coaching and leadership, Hachette UK.
5 Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149(3), 269-274.   DOI
6 Zhao, B., & Olivera, F. (2006). Error reporting in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 1012-1030.   DOI
7 권경숙, 오상진 (2020). 코칭리더십이 팀창의성에 미치는 영향: 피드백 수용도와 창의적 자기효능감의 다중매개효과를 중심으로. 경영교육연구 35(1), 291-314.
8 김수진, 김도영 (2019). 관광사업체 상사의 신뢰 및 피드백 추구 행동이 직무성과에 미치는 영향. MICE 관광연구, 19(2), 145-166.
9 김순영 (2011) 상사의 코칭이 직원의 인사평가 공정성 지각에 미치는 영향 연구. 서울시립대학교 경영대학원 석사학위논문.
10 김승중, 탁진국 (2021). 코칭 리더십이 인사평가효과성에 미치는 영향: 상사신뢰와 조직신뢰의 매개효과를 중심으로. 사회과학연구, 60(2), 1-29.
11 김어림. 한태영(2018). 목표지향성이 지속학습 활동에 미치는 영향에서 긍정 및 부정 피드백 추구행동의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 31(1), 123-147.
12 박정훈 (2012). 심리적 안정감의 두 측면: 조직에 대한 인식과 개인적 성향이 부정적 피드백 추구행동에 미치는 영향. 고려대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 .
13 박주현 (2016). 코칭리더십이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향: 조직신뢰의 매개효과. 서울벤처대학원대학교 박사학위 논문.
14 서영진 (2012). 작문 활동에서 동료 피드백 의견 수형별 수용도 연구. 국어교육학연구, 45, 242-271.
15 양일선, 이승호, 이덕로 (2015). 코칭리더십이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향 - 부하의 감성지능의 매개효과를 중심으로. 인적자원관리연구, 22(5), 49-72
16 유호선 (2020). 성과주의 인사제도의 변화 방향과 시사점. 사회과학연구, 59(1), 591-626.
17 이수광 (2009). 변혁적 리더십의 부정적 결과에 관한 연구: 소진과 매개효과를 중심으로. 서비스산업연구, 6(1), 61-73
18 이수호, 한태영 (2008). 성과관리 코칭과 피드백 환경이 인사평가 공정성에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 21(1), 59-81.
19 이수호 (2007). 인사평가 공정성 지각 및 목표설정에 대한 성과관리 코칭과 팀 피드백 환경의 영향. 광운대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
20 전영욱, 김진모 (2009). 팀 학습에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 구조분석. 한국성인교육학회, 12(4), 115-146.
21 전학철, 진초운, 구자숙 (2020). 목표지향성이 개인 창의성 및 직무성과에 미치는 영향 피드백 추구행동의 매개효과와 심리적 자본의 조절효과를 중심으로. 기업경영연구 27(5), 1-23.
22 정성훈, 유태용 (2008). 피드백 추구를 위한 모니터링과 묻기의 선행변인과 결과변인에 관한 연구, 한국심리학회지, 21(2), 285-312.   DOI
23 조은현, 탁진국 (2011). 코칭리더십 척도 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 24(1), 127-155.
24 지성호, 강영순 (2015), 개인 성향과 직무수행의 관계에서 피드백 추구행동의 매개효과, 대한경영학회지, 28(12), 3069-3093.
25 최병권 (2014). 피드백추구행동이 직무성과 및 직무만족에 미치는 영향: 육성적 피드백과 상사의 부하신뢰의 역할. 대한경영학회지, 27(2), 179-199
26 최병권, 이병숙, 김기태 (2015). 피드백 원천에 따른 피드백 추구 동기, 피드백 내용, 피드백 추구 결과 간의 관계에 대한 연구. 大韓經營學會誌 28(10), 2541-2564.
27 최영주 (2016). 진정성 리더십이 직무열의에 미치는 영향에서 절차공정성의 매개효과. 광운대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
28 한미옥 (2020). 인사평가 피드백이 평가공정성 지각에 미치는 영향. 제주대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
29 한태영 (2010). 피평가자 관점의 인사평가효과성의 구성개념 고찰과 측정도구 개발. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 23(2), 365-394.
30 한태영 (2015). 인사평가와 성과관리 개정판, (주)시그마프레스.
31 허 욱, 강혜선, 구자숙(2018). 피드백 메시지가 직무 결과에 미치는 영향: 핵심자아평가와 LMX, 피드백 수용도를 중심으로 인사조직연구, 26(3), 57-89.
32 Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., & Luthans, F. (2011). Experimentally analyzing the impact of leader positivity on follower positivity and performance. Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 282-294.   DOI
33 Akhtar, T., & Khattak, S. (2013). Employee acceptability of performance appraisals: issues of fairness and justice. World Applied Sciences Journal, 24(4), 507-518.
34 American Management Association. (2008). Coaching: A global study of successful practices. Current trends and future possibilities 2008-2018. Canada: American Management Association.
35 Ammons, R. B. (1956). Effects of knowledge of performance: A survey and tentative theoretical formulation. The Journal of General Psychology, 54(2), 279-299.
36 Ashford, S. J., and Cummings, L. L. (1983), Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information, Organizational behavior and human performance, 32(3), 370-398.   DOI
37 Anseel, F., Beatty, A. S., Shen, W., Lievens, F., and Sackett, P. R. (2015), How are we doing after 30 years? A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of feedback-seeking behavior, Journal of Management, 41(1), 318-348.
38 Anseel, F., Lievens, F., and Levy, P. E. (2007), A self-motives perspective on feedback-seeking behavior: Linking organizational behavior and social psychology research, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(3), 211-236.
39 Ashford, S. J. (1986), Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective, Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 465-487.   DOI
40 Ashford, S. J., and Tsui, A. S. (1991), Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking, Academy of Management Journal, 34(2), 251-280.   DOI
41 Ashford, S. J., Blatt, R., and VandeWalle, D. (2003), Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations, Journal of Management, 29(6), 773-799.   DOI
42 Audia, P. G., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Benefiting from negative feedback. Human Resource Managemen t Review, 13, 631-646.
43 Baer, M., and Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 24(1), 45-68.   DOI
44 Burris, E. R., Detert, J. R., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2008). Quitting before leaving: The mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 912-922.
45 Crommelinck, M., and Anseel, F. (2013), Understanding and encouraging feedback-seeking behaviour: a literature review, Medical education, 47(3), 232-241.
46 Camacho, L. M., & Paulus, P. B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1071-1080.   DOI
47 Cannon, M. D., and Witherspoon, R. (2005). Actionable feedback: Unlocking the power of learning and performance improvement, Academy of Management Perspectives, 19(2), 120-134   DOI
48 Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R. & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive Leadership and Employee Involvement in Creative Tasks in the Workplace: The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250-260.   DOI
49 Cunha, P. V., and Louro, M. J. (2000). Building teams that learn. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(1), 152-153.
50 Davis, D. R., Ellett, C. D., & Annunziata, J. (2002). Teacher evaluation, leadership and learning organizations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16(4), 287-301.
51 Detert, J. R. & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open?. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.   DOI
52 Dipboye, R. L., & De Pontbriand, R. (1981). Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(2), 248-251.   DOI
53 DiGirolamo, J. A., & Tkach, J. T. (2019). An exploration of managers and leaders using coaching skills. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 71(3), 195-218.   DOI
54 Dominick, P. G. (2009). Forced rankings: Pros, cons, and practices. In Performance management: Putting research into action, 411-443. John Wiley & Sons.
55 Eichinger, R. W., & Lombardo, M. M. (2004). Patterns of rater accuracy in 360-degree feedback. Human Resource Planning, 27(4), 23-26.
56 Drucker, P. F. (1988), The coming of the new organization, Harvard Business Review, 66(1), 45-53.
57 Edmondson, A. C (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative science quarterly. 44(2), 350-383.   DOI
58 Edmondson, A. C (2004). Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: A group lens. Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches, 239-272.
59 Ellinger, A. D., Ellinger, A. E., & Keller, S. B. (2003). Supervisory coaching behavior, employee satisfaction, and warehouse employee performance: A dyadic perspective in the distribution industry. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(4), 435-458.   DOI
60 Gabris, G. T., & Ihrke, D. M. (2000). Improving employee acceptance toward performance appraisal and merit pay systems: The role of leadership credibility. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20(1), 41-53.
61 Giles, W. F., & Mossholder, K. W. (1990). Employee reactions to contextual and session components of performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4), 371-377.   DOI
62 Gilliland, S. W., & Langdon, J. C. (1998). Creating performance management systems that promote perceptions of fairness. In Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice, 209-243
63 Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of applied psychology, 71(2), 340-342.   DOI
64 Greller, M. M. (1978). The nature of subordinate participation in the appraisal interview. Academy of Management Journal, 21(4), 646-658.   DOI
65 Heslin, P. A., Vandewalle, D. O. N., & Latham, G. P. (2006). Keen to help? Managers' implicit person theories and their subsequent employee coaching. Personnel Psychology, 59(4), 871-902.   DOI
66 Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170.   DOI
67 Hackman, J. R., and Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching, Academy of management review, 30(2), 269-287.
68 Hays, J. C., and Williams, J. R. (2011). Testing multiple motives in feedback seeking: The interaction of instrumentality and self protection motives, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 496-504.
69 Human Capital Institute, & International Coach Federation. (2016). Building a coaching culture with managers and leaders. Cincinnati, OH: Human Capital Institute.
70 Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., and Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations, Journal of applied Psychology, 64(4), 349.
71 Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., and Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations, Journal of applied Psychology, 64(4), 349.
72 Ilies, R., Pater, I. E. D., & Judge, T. (2007). Differential affective reactions to negative and positive feed-back, and the role of self-esteem. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 590-609.   DOI
73 Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.   DOI
74 Kark, R., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Alive and creating: The mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 785-804.   DOI
75 Lam, W., Huang, X., and Snape, E. (2007). Feedback-seeking behavior and leader-member exchange: Do supervisor-attributed motives matter?, Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 348-363.
76 Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (2000). Performance appraisal reactions: Measurement, modeling, and method bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 708-723.
77 Kolditz, T. A., and Arkin, R. M. (1982). An impression management interpretation of the self-handicapping strategy, Journal of personality and social psychology, 43(3), 492.
78 Kuvaas, B. (2011). The interactive role of performance appraisal reactions and regular feedback. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(2), 123-137.   DOI
79 Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 212-247.   DOI
80 Latham, G. P., Almost, J., Mann, S., & Moore, C. (2005). New developments in performance management. Organizational Dynamics, 34(1), 77-87.   DOI
81 Lee, A. V., Vargo, J., and Seville, E. (2013). Developing a tool to measure and compare organizations's resilience, Natural hazards review, 14(1), 29-41.   DOI
82 Levy, P. E., Albright, M. D., Cawley, B. D., & Williams, J. R. (1995). Situational and individual determinants of feedback seeking: A closer look at the process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(1), 23-37.   DOI
83 Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-92.   DOI
84 Locke, E. A., and Latham, G. P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel, Psychological science, 1(4), 240-246.   DOI
85 Morrison, E. W. (2002). Information seeking within organizations, Human Communication Research, 28(2), 229-242.
86 Maltbia, T. E., & Marsick, V. J. (2009). Leadership team coaching: Reviewing literature to inform practice and future research. In Proceedings, Academy of Human Resource Development Conference, Annual Conference.
87 McLean, G. N., Yang, B., Kuo, M. H. C., Tolbert, A. S., & Larkin, C. (2005). Development and initial validation of an instrument measuring managerial coaching skill. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16(2), 157-178.   DOI
88 Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don't communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1453-1476.   DOI
89 Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Sage.
90 Nathan, B. R., Mohrman Jr, A. M., & Milliman, J. (1991). Interpersonal relations as a context for the effects of appraisal interviews on performance and satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 34(2), 352-369.
91 Northcraft, G. B., and Ashford, S. J. (1990). The preservation of self in everyday life: The effects of performance expectations and feedback context on feedback inquiry, Organizational Behavior and human decision processes, 47(1), 42-64.   DOI
92 Park, G., Schmidt, A. M., Scheu, C., and DeShon, R. P. (2007). A process model of goal orientation and feedback seeking, Human Performance, 20(2), 119-145.
93 Prue, D. M., & Fairbank, J. A. (1981). Performance feedback in organizational behavior management. A review. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 3(1). 1-16.   DOI
94 Shalley, C. E., and Perry-Smith, J. E. (2001). Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience, Organizational Behavior and human decision processes, 84(1), 1-22.   DOI
95 Reinke, S. J. (2003). Does the form really matter? Leadership, trust, and acceptance of the performance appraisal process. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 23(1), 23-37.   DOI
96 Renn, R. W., and Fedor, D. B. (2001). Development and field test of a feedback seeking, self-efficacy, and goal setting model of work performance, Journal of Management, 9(1), 147-164.
97 Schein, E. H. (1993). How can organizations learn faster? The challenge of entering the green room. Sloan Management Review, 34: 85-92.
98 Siegel, P. A., Post, C., Brockner, J., Fishman, A. Y., & Garden, C. (2005). The moderating influence of procedural fairness on the relationship between work-life conflict and organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 13.
99 Steelman, L. A., & Rutkowski, K. A. (2004). Moderators of employee reactions to negative feedback. Journal of Managerial Psychology.
100 Stober, D. R., & Grant, A. M. (2006). Toward a contextual approach to coaching models. In D. R. Stober
101 Stone, E. F., & Stone, D. L. (1984). The effects of multiple sources of performance feedback and feedback favorability on self-perceived task competence and perceived feedback accuracy. Journal of Management, 10(3), 371-378.   DOI
102 Stowell, S. J. (1988), Coaching: A commitment to leadership, Training & Development Journal, 42(6), 34-39.
103 Thach, L., & Heinselman, T. (2000). Continuous improvement in place of training. Coaching for Leadership, Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA, 219-30.
104 Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2012a). The effect of procedural justice in the relationship between charismatic leadership and feedback reactions in performance appraisal. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(15), 3047-3062.   DOI
105 Tuckey, M., Brewer, N., & Williamson, P. (2002). The influence of motives and goal orientation on feedback seeking. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(2), 195-216.   DOI
106 Taylor, M. S., Tracy, K. B., Renard, M. K., Harrison, J. K., & Carroll, S. J. (1995). Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 495-523.   DOI
107 Tsui, A. S., and Ashford, S. J. (1994). Adaptive self-regulation: A process view of managerial effectiveness, Journal of Management, 20(1), 93-121.   DOI