Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.53302/kjfp.2022.07.13.2.99

Recidivism prediction of sex offender risk assessment tools: STATIC-99 and HAGSOR-Dynamic  

Yoon, Jeongsook (Korean Institute of Criminology and Justice)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Forensic Psychology / v.13, no.2, 2022 , pp. 99-119 More about this Journal
Abstract
Research on sex offense has shown that sex offenders are very heterogeneous. Sex offenders are heterogeneous in their probability of risk of recidivism. Some sex offenders are known to be much higher in their tendencies to reactivate than others. The study examined the predictive and explanatory power of static and dynamic risk factors in STATIC-99 and HAGSOR-Dynamic which have been used in Korean correctional facilities since 2014. STATIC-99 and HAGSOR-Dynamic showed moderate predictive accuracy for all crimes(AUC = .737, AUC = .597, respectively, ps < .001). However, when examining sex crime alone, only STATIC-99 predicted recidivism significantly(AUC = .743, p < .001). The incremental predictive power of HAGSOR-Dynamic was confirmed; the explanatory power of Model 2 comprising both static and dynamic risk factors were significant beyond Model 1 comprising only static factors(∆χ2= 12.721, p < .001), but this tendency was only applied to the model of all crimes. These findings were discussed with implications of practicing the sex offender assessment and treatment.
Keywords
sex offenders; risk assessment; STATIC-99; HAGSOR-Dynamic; static risk factor; dynamic risk factor;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Helmus, L., Babchishin, K. M., & Blais, J. (2012). Predictive accuracy of dynamic risk factors for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal sex offenders: An exploratory comparison using STABLE2007. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56(6), 856-876.   DOI
2 Knight, R. (1999). Validation of a Typology for Rapist. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(3), 303-330.   DOI
3 Mann, R., Hanson, K., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual Recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 2, 1-27.
4 Rosenberg, R., & Knight, R. A. (1988). Determining Male Sexual Offender Subtypes Using Cluster Analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4(4), 383-410.   DOI
5 Robertiello, G., & Terry, K. J. (2007). Can we profile sex offenders? A review of sex offender typologies. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 12(5), 508-518.   DOI
6 Seto, M, C. (2008). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
7 Thornton, D. (2002). Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 139-153.   DOI
8 Thornton, D. (2006). Age and sexual recidivism: A variable connection. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18(2), 123-135.   DOI
9 Thornton, D., Mann, R., Webster, S., Blud, L., Travers, R., Friendship, C., & Erikson, M. (2003). Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 225-235.
10 Webster, S. D., Mann, R. E., Carter, A. J., Long, J., Milner, R. J., O'Brien, M. D., & Ray, N. L. (2006). Inter-rater reliability of dynamic risk assessment with sexual offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12(4), 439-452.   DOI
11 Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission. (2001). Assessing Risk Among Sex Offenders in Virginia.
12 윤정숙, 성유리, 이태헌 (2021). 교정시설내 경비처우등급 및 교정재범예측지표 개선 방안연구. 한국형사.법무정책연구원 연구총서.
13 윤정숙, 김민영, 이태헌 (2020). 교정시설내 성범죄자 심리치료프로그램 효과성 평가연구. 한국형사정책연구원 연구총서
14 이수정, 고려진, 박혜란 (2008). 한국 성범죄자 위험성 평가 도구 개발 및 타당도 연구. 형사정책연구, 19, 309-345.
15 이일현 (2014). EasyFlow 회귀분석. 한나래출판사.
16 조은경 (2010). 성폭력사범 재범위험성 평가척도 개발. 법무부 연구용역보고서.
17 Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct(4th ed.). Newark, NJ: LexisNexis.
18 Barbaree, H. E., Blanchard, R., & Langton, C. M. (2003). The development of sexual aggression through the life span: The effect of age on sexual arousal and recidivism among sex offenders. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 59-71.
19 Boer, D. R., Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Webster, C. D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk-20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada: Mental Healty, Law, & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
20 Campbell, T. W. (2004). Assessing sex offenders; problems and pitfalls. Charles C Thomaspublisher: USA, Illinois.
21 Eher, R., Matthes, A., Schilling, F., Haubner-MacLean, T., & Rettenberger, M. (2012). Dynamic risk assessment in sexual offenders using STABLE-2000 and the STABLE-2007: An investigation of predictive and incremental validity. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 24(1), 5-28.   DOI
22 Etzler S, Eher R, Rettenberger M. (2018). Dynamic Risk Assessment of Sexual Offenders: Validity and dimensional Structure of the Stable-2007. Assessment, 27(4), 822-839.   DOI
23 Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the Revised Psychopathy Checklist. Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
24 Hanson, R. K. (2002). Recidivism and age: Follow-up data from 4673 offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 1046-1062.   DOI
25 Hanson, R. K., & Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.   DOI
26 Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Scott, T.-L., & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The Dynamic Supervision Project (User Report No. 2007-05). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada.
27 Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136.   DOI
28 Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2003). Notes on the development of Static-2002. (Corrections Research User Report No. 2003-01). Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
29 Gendreau, P., Littel, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism; what works! Criminology, 24(4), 575-608.   DOI
30 Hepburn, J. & Griffin, L. M. (2004). An analysis of risk factors contributing to the recidivism of sex offenders on probation, (Document No. 203905), National Institute of Justice.
31 Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. (2001). A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13(2), 105-122.   DOI
32 Hart, S. D., & Boer, D. P. (2010). Structured professional judgment guidelines for sexual violence risk assessment: The sexual violence risk-20 (SVR-20) and risk for sexual violence protocol (RSVP). In R. K. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 269-294). Milton Park: Routledge.
33 Soothill, K., Francis, B., Sanderson, B., & Ackerley, E. (2000). SEX OFFENDERS: SPECIALISTS, GENERALISTS-OR BOTH? A 32-year Criminological Study. The British Journal of Criminology, 40(1), 56-67.   DOI
34 Webster, C. D., Nicholls, T. L., Martin, M-L., Desmarais, M. A. & Brink, J. (2006), Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START): The case for a new structured professional judgment scheme. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 24, 747-766.   DOI