Browse > Article

Validation of Segmental Multi-Frequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis based on the Segmental Bioelectrical Impedance analysis in the Elderly Population  

Tang, Sae-Jo (순천향대학교)
Kim, Jang-Hee (스포츠유전자)
Eom, Jin Jong (순천향대학교 사회체육학과)
Eom, Sunho (순천향대학교)
Kim, Hakkyun (순천향대학교)
Kim, Chul-Hyun (순천향대학교 스포츠의학과)
Publication Information
Journal of Platform Technology / v.9, no.2, 2021 , pp. 38-45 More about this Journal
Abstract
A frequently used bioimpedance analytical method in Korea is the segmental multi-frequency BIA (SMF-BIA) method, but it is not directly determined at a segmented impedance. This study was to compare SMF-BIA determinations with direct segmented determinations for accuracy and appropriateness of segment parameters. This study is to compare the segment parameters, accuracy and appropriateness of the multi-frequency segmental bioimpedance analysis. To this end, 108 elderly individuals were measured. Segmented bioelectrical measurements obtained from a SMF-BIA (Inbody S10) at 50 kHz and measured with a phase sensitive single frequency device (SF-BIA, bia-101, RJL / akern systems) were compared. The significant difference (%) was demonstrated between single - and multiple frequency determinations of the right upper limb (R = 35.5 ± 6.2%, P < 0.001; Xc = 2.7 ± 7.6%, P < 0.01), left upper limb difference (R= 33. 9 ± 6.0%, P < 0.001; Xc = 2.8 ± 8.3%, P < 0.01), right lower limb difference (R = 18.6 ± 4.3%, P < 0.001; Xc = 25.8 ± 10.0%, P < 0.001), left lower limb difference (R = 18.0 ± 4.7%, P < 0.001; Xc = 31.8%). Of the results determined with the two BIA methods, the impedance measurements of the limbs and whole body showed a high correlation (RA: R = 0. 950, LA: R = 0. 949, RL: R = 0.899, LL: R = 0.88), and in the agreement test, the impedance values of the upper limbs and whole body also showed strong agreement (ICC > 0.9), but in the Xc, the correlation was weak. In conclusion, it was found that although bioimpedance devices had significantly different characteristics and inconsistent cross sectionally, there was a high population level agreement in the upper and lower extremities in determining segmental resistance value changes. But a large error was found on the trunk. Further studies were needed for reducing the error.
Keywords
bioelectrical impedance; segmental; validity; agreement; reactance; resistance;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kyle, U. G., Bosaeus, I., De Lorenzo, A. D., Deurenberg, P., Elia, M., Gomez, J. M., Heitmann, B. L., Kent-Smith, L., Melchior, J. C., Pirlich, M., Scharfetter, H., Schols, A. M., Pichard, C., & Composition of the ESPEN Working Group (2004). Bioelectrical impedance analysis--part I: review of principles and methods. Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 23(5), 1226-1243.   DOI
2 Jones, M. D., Wewege, M. A., Hackett, D. A., Keogh, J., & Hagstrom, A. D. (2021). Sex Differences in Adaptations in Muscle Strength and Size Following Resistance Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 51(3), 503-517.   DOI
3 Kotani, K., Tokunaga, K., Fujioka, S., Kobatake, T., Keno, Y., Yoshida, S., Shimomura, I., Tarui, S., & Matsuzawa, Y. (1994). Sexual dimorphism of age-related changes in whole-body fat distribution in the obese. International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 18(4).
4 Sawada, M., Kubota, N., Sekine, R., Yakabe, M., Kojima, T., Umeda-Kameyama, Y., Usami, S., Akishita, M., & Ogawa, S. (2021). Sex-related differences in the effects of nutritional status and body composition on functional disability in the elderly. PloS one, 16(2), e0246276.   DOI
5 Tanabe, R. F., de Azevedo, Z. M., Fonseca, V. M., Peixoto, M. V., dos Anjos, L. A., Gaspar-Elsas, M. I., Moore, D. C., & Ramos, E. G. (2012). Distribution of bioelectrical impedance vector values in multi-ethnic infants and pre-school children. Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 31(1), 144-148.   DOI
6 Scheltinga, M. R., Jacobs, D. O., Kimbrough, T. D., & Wilmore, D. W. (1991). Alterations in body fluid content can be detected by bioelectrical impedance analysis. The Journal of surgical research, 50(5), 461-468.   DOI
7 Stahn A, Terblanche E and Gunga H-C. (2012). Use of bioelectrical impedance: general principles and overview Handbook of Anthropometry: Physical Measures of Human form in Health and Disease ed V R Preedy (New York: Springer) pp 49-90 chapter 3
8 Tinsley, G. M., Moore, M. L., Silva, A. M., & Sardinha, L. B. (2020). Cross-sectional and longitudinal agreement between two multifrequency bioimpedance devices for resistance, reactance, and phase angle values. European journal of clinical nutrition, 74(6), 900-911.   DOI
9 Bedogni, G., Marra, M., Bianchi, L., Malavolti, M., Nicolai, E., De Filippo, E., & Scalfi, L. (2003). Comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of appendicular body composition in anorexic women. European journal of clinical nutrition, 57(9), 1068-1072.   DOI
10 Gallagher, D., Visser, M., De Meersman, R. E., Sepulveda, D., Baumgartner, R. N., Pierson, R. N., Harris, T., & Heymsfield, S. B. (1997). Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: effects of age, gender, and ethnicity. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 83(1), 229-239.   DOI
11 Piccoli, A., Pastori, G., Codognotto, M., & Paoli, A. (2007). Equivalence of information from single frequency v. bioimpedance spectroscopy in bodybuilders. The British journal of nutrition, 97(1), 182-192.   DOI
12 Genton, L., Norman, K., Spoerri, A., Pichard, C., Karseg ard, V. L., Herrmann, F. R., & Graf, C. E. (2017). Bioimpedance-Derived Phase Angle and Mortality Among Older People. Rejuvenation research, 20(2), 118-124.   DOI
13 Cornish, B. H., Jacobs, A., Thomas, B. J., & Ward, L. C. (1999). Optimizing electrode sites for segmental bioimpedance measurements. Physiological measurement, 20(3), 241-250.   DOI
14 Mally, K., & Dittmar, M. (2012). Comparison of three segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance techniques in healthy adults. Annals of human biology, 39(6), 468-478.   DOI
15 Shiffman C. A. (2013). Adverse effects of near current-electrode placement in non-invasive bioimpedance measurements. Physiological measurement, 34(11), 1513-1529.   DOI
16 Fuller, N. J., Fewtrell, M. S., Dewit, O., Elia, M., & Wells, J. C. (2002). Segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis in children aged 8-12 y: 2. The assessment of regional body composition and muscle mass. International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 26(5), 692-700.
17 Nescolarde, L., Lukaski, H., De Lorenzo, A., de-Mateo-Silleras, B., Redondo-Del-Rio, M. P., & Camina-Martin, M. A. (2016). Different displacement of bioimpedance vector due to Ag/AgCl electrode effect. European journal of clinical nutrition, 70(12), 1401-1407.   DOI
18 Silva, A. M., Matias, C. N., Nunes, C. L., Santos, D. A., Marini, E., Lukaski, H. C., & Sardinha, L. B. (2019). Lack of agreement of in vivo raw bioimpedance measurements obtained from two single and multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance devices. European journal of clinical nutrition, 73(7), 1077-1083.   DOI
19 Piccoli, A., Pastori, G., Guizzo, M., Rebeschini, M., Naso, A., & Cascone, C. (2005). Equivalence of information from single versus multiple frequency bioimpedance vector analysis in hemodialysis. Kidney international, 67(1), 301-313.   DOI
20 Tinsley, G. M., Harty, P. S., Moore, M. L., Grgic, J., Silva, A. M., & Sardinha, L. B. (2019). Changes in total and segmental bioelectrical resistance are correlated with whole-body and segmental changes in lean soft tissue following a resistance training intervention. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 16(1), 58.   DOI