Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22722/KJPM.2022.30.2.55

The Empathy and Justice Contemplated From the Neuroscientific Perspective in the Age of Social Divisions and Conflicts  

Ji-Woong, Kim (Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Konyang University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine / v.30, no.2, 2022 , pp. 55-65 More about this Journal
Abstract
Although humans exist as Homo Empathicus, human society is actually constantly divided and conflicted between groups. The human empathy response is very sensitive to the justice of others, and depending on the level of others' justice, they may feel empathy or schadenfreude to the suffering of them. However, our empathy to others' suffering are not always fair, and have inherent limitations of ingroup-biased empathy. Depending on whether the suffering other persons belongs to an ingroup or an outgroup, we may feel biased empathy or biased schadenfreude to them without even realizing it. Recent advances in information and communication technology facilitate biased access to ingroup-related SNS or ingroup media, thereby deepening the establishment of a more biased semantic information network related groups. These processes, through interacting with the inherent limitation of empathy, can form a vicious cycle of more biased ingroup empathy and ingroup-related activities, and accelerate divisions and conflicts. This research investigated the properties and limitations of empathy by reviewing studies on the neural mechanism of empathy. By examining the relationship between empathy and justice from a neuroscientific point of view, this research tried to illuminate the modern society of division and conflict in a different dimension from the classical perspective of social science.
Keywords
Empathy; Justice; Ingroup-biased empathy; Schadenfreude; Neuroscience;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kum HS, Song KJ. A study on political effect of the internet politician fan community in the U.S.A. and Korea. Discourse 2013;16:145-169.    DOI
2 Choi BS. The Political Fandom of Korean and the Acceptance of the Film: , (2013) vs. Father>, (2014). Int J Contents 2018;18:289-304. 
3 Bastiaansen JA, Thioux M, Keysers C. Evidence for mirror systems in emotions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2009;364:2391-2404.    DOI
4 Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Seitz RJ, Zilles K, Rizzolatti G, Freund HJ. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 2001;13:400-404.    DOI
5 Keysers C, Wicker B, Gazzola V, Anton JL, Fogassi L, Gallese V. A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron 2004;42:335-346.    DOI
6 Wicker B, Keysers C, Plailly J, Royet JP, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G. Both of us disgusted in my insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 2003:40:655-664.    DOI
7 Carr L, Iacoboni M, Dubeau MC, Mazziotta JC, Lenzi GL. Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:5497-5502.    DOI
8 Wager TD, Atlas LY, Lindquist MA, Roy M, Woo CW, Kross E. An fMRI-based neurologic signature of physical pain. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1388-1397.    DOI
9 Fomberstein K, Qadri S, Ramani R. Functional MRI and pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2013;26:588-593.    DOI
10 Jackson PL, Meltzoff AN, Decety J. How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neuroimage 2005;24:771-779.    DOI
11 Singer T, Seymour B, O'Doherty J, Kaube H, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 2004;303:1157-1162.    DOI
12 Rutgen M, Seidel EM, Silani G, Riecansky I, Hummer A, Windischberger C, Petrovic P, Lamm C. Placebo analgesia and its opioidergic regulation suggest that empathy for pain is grounded in self pain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112:E5638-E5646. 
13 Rutgen M, Seidel EM, Riecansky I, Lamm C. Reduction of empathy for pain by placebo analgesia suggests functional equivalence of empathy and first-hand emotion experience. J Neurosci 2015;35:8938-8947.    DOI
14 Eisenberger NI, Lieberman MD, Williams KD. Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science 2003;302:290-292.    DOI
15 Eisenberger NI. The pain of social disconnection: examining the shared neural underpinnings of physical and social pain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2012;13:421-434.    DOI
16 MacDonald G, Leary MR. Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychol Bull 2005;131:202-223.    DOI
17 Kross E, Berman MG, Mischel W, Smith EE, Wager TD. Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:6270-6275.    DOI
18 Dewall CN, Macdonald G, Webster GD, Masten CL, Baumeister RF, Powell C, Combs D, Schurtz DR, Stillman TF, Tice DM, Eisenberger NI. Acetaminophen reduces social pain: behavioral and neural evidence. Psychol Sci 2010;21:931-937.    DOI
19 Masten CL, Morelli SA, Eisenberger NI. An fMRI investigation of empathy for 'social pain' and subsequent prosocial behavior. Neuroimage 2011;55:381-388.    DOI
20 Amodio DM. The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping. Nat Rev Neurosci 2014;15:670-682.    DOI
21 Tarrant M, Dazeley S, Cottom T. Social categorization and empathy for outgroup members. Br J Soc Psychol 2009;48:427-446.    DOI
22 Montalan B, Lelard T, Godefroy O, Mouras H. Behavioral investigation of the influence of social categorization on empathy for pain: a minimal group paradigm study. Front Psychol 2012;3:389.    DOI
23 Forgiarini M, Gallucci M, Maravita A. Racism and empathy for pain on our skin. Front Psychol 2011;2:108.    DOI
24 Xu X, Zuo X, Wang X, Han S. Do you feel my pain? Racial group membership modulates empathic neural responses. J Neurosci 2009;29:8525-8529.    DOI
25 Azevedo RT, Macaluso E, Avenanti A, Santangelo V, Cazzato V, Aglioti SM. Their pain is not our pain: brain and autonomic correlates of empathic resonance with the pain of same and different race individuals. Hum Brain Mapp 2013;34:3168-3181    DOI
26 Hein G, Silani G, Preuschoff K, Batson CD, Singer T. Neural responses to ingroup and outgroup members' suffering predict individual differences in costly helping. Neuron 2010;68:149-160.    DOI
27 Sheng F, Han S. Manipulations of cognitive strategies and intergroup relationships reduce the racial bias in empathic neural responses. Neuroimage 2012;61:786-797.    DOI
28 Shen F, Hu Y, Fan M, Wang H, Wang Z. Racial Bias in Neural Response for Pain Is Modulated by Minimal Group. Front Hum Neurosci 2018;11:661.    DOI
29 Ruckmann J, Bodden M, Jansen A, Kircher T, Dodel R, Rief W. How pain empathy depends on ingroup/outgroup decisions: a functional magnet resonance imaging study. Psychiatry Res 2015;234:57-65.    DOI
30 Luo S, Li B, Ma Y, Zhang W, Rao Y, Han S. Oxytocin receptor gene and racial ingroup bias in empathy-related brain activity. Neuroimage 2015;110:22-131.    DOI
31 Kim JW, Kim SE, Kim JJ, Jeong B, Park CH, Son AR, Song JE, Ki SW. Compassionate attitude towards others' suffering activates the mesolimbic neural system. Neuropsychologia 2009;47:2073-2081.    DOI
32 Klimecki OM, Leiberg S, Ricard M, Singer T. Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2014;9:873-879.    DOI
33 Klimecki OM, Leiberg S, Lamm C, Singer T. Functional neural plasticity and associated changes in positive affect after compassion training. Cereb Cortex 2013;23:1552-1561.    DOI
34 Cao Y, Contreras-Huerta LS, McFadyen J, Cunnington R. Racial bias in neural response to others' pain is reduced with other-race contact. Cortex 2015;70:68-78.    DOI
35 Zuo X, Han S. Cultural experiences reduce racial bias in neural responses to others' suffering. Cult Brain 2013;1:34-46.   DOI
36 Zaki J, Cikara M. Addressing empathic failures. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2015;24:471-476.    DOI
37 Morrison I, Lloyd D, di Pellegrino G, Roberts N. Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue? Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2004;4:270-278.    DOI
38 Beeney JE, Franklin RG Jr, Levy KN, Adams RB Jr. I feel your pain: emotional closeness modulates neural responses to empathically experienced rejection. Soc Neurosci 2011;6:369-376.    DOI
39 Bloom P. Empathy and its discontents. Trends Cogn Sci 2017;21:24-31.    DOI
40 Decety J, Cowell JM. The complex relation between morality and empathy. Trends Cogn Sci 2014;18:337-339.    DOI
41 Decety J, Cowell JM. Friends or foes: is empathy necessary for moral behavior? Perspect Psychol Sci 2014;9:525-537.    DOI
42 Singer T, Seymour B, O'Doherty JP, Stephan KE, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature 2006;439:466-469.    DOI
43 Zheng L, Wang Q, Cheng X, Li L, Yang G, Sun L, Ling X, Guo X. Perceived reputation of others modulates empathic neural responses. Exp Brain Res 2016;234:125-132.    DOI
44 Decety J, Echols S, Correll J. The blame game: the effect of responsibility and social stigma on empathy for pain. J Cogn Neurosci 2010;22:985-997.    DOI
45 Azevedo RT, Macaluso E, Viola V, Sani G, Aglioti SM. Weighing the stigma of weight: an fMRI study of neural reactivity to the pain of obese individuals. Neuroimage 2014;91:109-119.    DOI
46 Ito TA, Bartholow BD. The neural correlates of race. Trends Cogn Sci 2009;13:524-531.    DOI
47 Kubota JT, Banaji MR, Phelps EA. The neuroscience of race. Nat Neurosci 2012;15:940-948.    DOI
48 Decety J, Svetlova M. Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2012;2:1-24.    DOI
49 Meyer ML, Masten CL, Ma Y, Wang C, Shi Z, Eisenberger NI, Han S. Empathy for the social suffering of friends and strangers recruits distinct patterns of brain activation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2013;8:446-454.    DOI
50 Singer T, Klimecki OM. Empathy and compassion. Curr Biol 2014;24:R875-R878.    DOI
51 Cohen TR, Insko CA. War and peace: possible approaches to reducing intergroup conflict. Perspect Psychol Sci 2008;3:87-93.    DOI
52 Kim KM, Lee SS. News audiences'perceptual biases and assessment of news fairness. Communication Theories 2018;14:145-198.    DOI
53 Song ID. Biased media perception based on media partisanship and audience's political disposition: in case of newspaper editorials. Communication Theories 2014;10:222-257. 
54 Cottrell CA, Neuberg SL. Different emotional reactions to different groups: a sociofunctional threat-based approach to 'prejudice'. J Pers Soc Psychol 2005;88:770-789.    DOI
55 Leach CW, Spears R, Branscombe NR, Doosje B. Malicious pleasure: schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003;84:923-943. 
56 Cikara M, Botvinick MM, Fiske ST. Us versus them: social identity shapes neural responses to intergroup competition and harm. Psychol Sci 2011;22:306-313.    DOI
57 Ash K, Dolan TM. Politics of interconfessional empathy and Schadenfreude in Lebanon. Confl Manag Peace Sci 2021;38:718-741.    DOI
58 Cohen TR, Montoya RM, Insko CA. Group morality and intergroup relations: cross-cultural and experimental evidence. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2006;32:1559-1572.    DOI
59 Mackie DM, Silver LA, Smith ER. Intergroup emotions: Emotion as an intergroup phenomenon. In: Leach CW, Tiedens LZ, editors. The social life of emotions: Studies in emotion and social interaction. Cambridge University Press;2004. p.227-244. 
60 Comb DJY, Powell CAJ, Schurtz DR, Smith RH. Politics, schadenfreude, and ingroup identification: the sometimes happy thing about a poor economy and death. J Exp Soc Psychol 2009;45:635-646.    DOI
61 Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak PJ, Fischbacher U, Fehr E. Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 2005;435:673-676.    DOI
62 Hurlemann R, Patin A, Onur OA, Cohen MX, Baumgartner T, Metzler S, Kendrick KM. Oxytocin enhances amygdala-dependent, socially reinforced learning and emotional empathy in humans. J. Neurosci 2010;30:4999-5007.    DOI
63 Shamay-Tsoory SG, Fischer M, Dvash J, Harari H, Perach-Bloom N, Levkovitz Y. Intranasal administration of oxytocin increases envy and schadenfreude (gloating). Biol Psychiatry 2009;66:864-870.    DOI
64 Tost H, Kolachana B, Hakimi S, Lemaitre H, Verchinski BA, Mattay VS, Weinberger DR, Meyer-Lindenberg A. A common allele in the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) impacts prosocial temperament and human hypothalamic-limbic structure and function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:13936-13941.    DOI
65 Smith KE, Porges EC, Norman GJ, Connelly JJ, Decety J. Oxytocin receptor gene variation predicts empathic concern and autonomic arousal while perceiving harm to others. Soc Neurosci 2014;9:1-9.    DOI
66 Krueger F, Parasuraman R, Iyengar V, Thornburg M, Weel J, Lin M, Clarke E, McCabe K, Lipsky RH. Oxytocin receptor genetic variation promotes human trust behavior. Front Hum Neurosci 2012;6:4.    DOI
67 Garrett RK, Stroud NJ. Partisan paths to exposure diversity: differences in pro- and counter attitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication 2014;64:680-701.    DOI
68 Rifkin J. The Empathic Civilization: The Race to Global Consciousness in a World in Crisis. New York: Penguin Group;2009. 
69 Batson CD. Addressing the altruism question experimentally. In: Post SG, Underwood LG, Schloss JP, Hurlbut WB, editors, Altruism and Altruistic Love. Oxford University Press, Oxford;2002. p.522. 
70 Obama B. The audacity of hope: thoughts on reclaiming the American dream. New York: Crown;2006. 
71 Lee SK. A double standard in Korean journalism. Communication Theories 2014;10:284-324. 
72 Kim MH. Camp-divided politics and political commentations on TV. Politics Public Opinion 2013:13;113-128.