1 |
Jackson, R., & Pellack, L. J. (2004). Internet subject guides in academic libraries: An analysis of contents, practices, and opinions. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 43(4), 319-327.
|
2 |
Berkeley Library. [n.d.]. Berkeley University Library Evaluating Resources. Retrieved from http://guides.lib.berkeley.edu/evaluating-resources#authority
|
3 |
Centra, J. A. (1977). How universities evaluate faculty performance: A survey of department heads. Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/GREB-75-05BR.pdf
|
4 |
Chung, Y. K., & Choi, Y. K. (2011). A Study on Faculty Evaluation of Research Achievements in Humanities and Social Sciences. Journal of Information management, 42(3), 211-233.
DOI
|
5 |
Dunsmore, C. (2002). A qualitative study of web-mounted pathfinders created by academic business libraries. Libri, 52(3), 137-156.
DOI
|
6 |
Finkenstaedt, T. (1990). Measuring research performance in the humanities. Scientometrics, 19(5-6), 409-417.
DOI
|
7 |
Fogg, B. J., Kameda, T., Boyd, J., Marshall, J., Sethi, R., Sockol, M., & Trowbridge, T. (2002). Stanford-Makovsky web credibility study 2002: Investigating what makes web sites credible today. Report from the Persuasive Technology Lab. Retrieved from http://credibility.stanford.edu/pdf/Stanford-MakovskyWebCredStudy2002-prelim.pdf.
|
8 |
Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D. R., Marable, L., Stanford, J., & Tauber, E. R. (2003, June). How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites?: a study with over 2,500 participants. In Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences (pp. 1-15). ACM.
|
9 |
Fogg, B. J., & Tseng, H. (1999, May). The elements of computer credibility. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 80-87). ACM. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.83.8354&rep=rep1&type=pdf
|
10 |
Gang, J. Y., Nam, Y. H., & Oh, H. J. (2017). An Evaluation of Web-Based Research Records Archival Information Services and Recommendations for Their Improvement: NTIS vs. NKIS. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 17(3), 139-160.
DOI
|
11 |
Georgetown Library. [n.d.]. Georgetown University Library Evaluating Internet Resources. Retrieved from https://www.library.georgetown.edu/tutorials/research-guides/evaluating-internet-content
|
12 |
Jackson, R., & Stacy-Bates, K. K. (2016). The enduring landscape of online subject research guides. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 55(3), 212.
|
13 |
Jauch, L. R., & Glueck, W. F. (1975). Evaluation of university professors' research performance. Management Science, 22(1), 66-75.
DOI
|
14 |
Jeong, W. C., & Rieh, H. Y. (2016). Users' Evaluation of Information Services in University Archives. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(1), 195-221.
DOI
|
15 |
Kim, H. S., Shin, K. J., & Choi, H. Y. (2007). A Study on the Development of Evaluation Framework for Public Portal Information Services. Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference, 5(1), 440-444.
|
16 |
Kang, H. I., & Jeong, Y. I. (2002). Measuring Library Online Service Quality: An Application of e-LibQual. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 19(3), 237-261.
DOI
|
17 |
Keum, J. D., & Weon, J. H. (2012). Establishing control system for the credibility of performance information. The Journal of Korean Policy Studies, 12(1), 59-75.
|
18 |
Kim, D. N., Lee, M. H., & Park, T. G. (2006). Constructing an Evaluation Model for the Professors Academic Achievement in the Humanities. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 19(3), 1-20.
|
19 |
Kim, S. (2012). A Study on the Current State of Online Subject Guides in Academic Libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management, 29(4), 165-189.
DOI
|
20 |
Kim, Y. K. (2007a). How Do People Evaluate a Web Sites Credibility. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 38(3), 53-72.
DOI
|
21 |
Kim, Y. K. (2007b). A Study on the Influence of Factors That Makes Web Sites Credible. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 41(4), 93-111.
DOI
|
22 |
Kim, Y. K. (2011). Comparative Study on Criteria for Evaluation of Internet Information. The Journal of Humanities, 27, 87-109.
|
23 |
Lee, I. Y. (2005). A Study on the Evaluation System of Research Institutes. The Journal of Educational Administration. 23(4), 343-364.
|
24 |
Johns Hopkins Libraries. [n.d.]. Johns Hopkins University Libraries Evaluating Your Sources. Retrieved from https://guides.library.oregonstate.edu/c.php?g=286235&p=1906707
|
25 |
Noh, Y., & Jeong, D. (2017). A Study to Develop and Apply Evaluation Factors for Subject Guides in South Korea. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(5), 423-433.
DOI
|
26 |
Lee, L. J. (2016). A Study on the Improvement Strategies of Moral Education Using Humanities (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
|
27 |
Lee, Y. H. (2017). A New Evaluating System for Academic Books on Humanities and Social Sciences in Korea. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 17(3), 624-632.
DOI
|
28 |
Moed, H. F. (2008, December). Research assessment in social sciences and humanities. In ECOOM Colloquium Antwerp. Retrieved from https://www.ecoom.be/sites/ecoom.be/files/downloads/1%20Lecture%20Moed%20Ecoom%20Antwerp%209%20Dec%202011%20SSH%20aangepast%20(2).pdf
|
29 |
Oregon Libraries. [n.d.]. University of Oregon Libraries Guidelines for evaluating sources. Retrieved from http://diy.library.oregonstate.edu/guidelines-evaluating-sources
|
30 |
Park, C. K. (2014). Evaluation in the Humanities: A Humanist Perspective. In/Outside, 37, 84-109.
|
31 |
Park, N. G. (2006). Analysis of the evaluation status of teaching professions by university and development of assessment model of teaching achievement. Seoul: Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development.
|
32 |
Skolnik, M. (2000). Does counting publications provide any useful information about academic performance?. Teacher Education Quarterly, 27(2), 15-25.
|
33 |
Song, H. H. (2011). Problems on current humanities journal assessment system and the alternatives. Studies of Korean & Chinese Humanities, 34, 457-481.
|
34 |
Yoon, S. W. (1996). Reliability Analysis. Seoul: Jayu academy.
|
35 |
Standler, B. R. (2004). Evaluation Credibility of Information on the Internet. Retrieved from http://www.rbs0.com/credible.pdf
|
36 |
University of Queensland Library. [n.d.]. UQ Library Evaluate Information You Find. Retrieved from https://web.library.uq.edu.au/research-tools-techniques/search-techniques/evaluate-information-you-find
|
37 |
Woo, B. K., Jeon, I. D., & Kim, S. S. (2006). The Effects of the Academic Research Evaluation System and the Research Achievements in Developed Countries. ICASE Magazine, 12(4), 21-32.
|