1 |
Levinthal, D., & Myatt, J. (1994). Co-evolution of capabilities and industry : A study of mutual fund processing. Strategic Management Journal, 15 (Special Issue), 45-62.
DOI
|
2 |
Li, D., Chau, P. Y. K., & Lou, H. (2005). Understanding individual adoption of instant messaging : An empirical investigation. The Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(4), 102-129.
|
3 |
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Ou, C. X. J., & Davison, R. M. (2011). Interactive or interruptive : Instant messaging at work. Decision Support Systems, 52(1), 61-72.
DOI
|
5 |
Ou, C. X. J., Pavlou, P. A., & Davison, R. M. (2014). Swift guanxi in online marketplaces : The role of computer-mediated-communication technologies. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 209-230 + A1-A24.
DOI
|
6 |
Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 37-60.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Quan-Haase, A., Cothrel, J., & Wellman, B. (2005). Instant messaging for collaboration : A case study of a high-tech firm. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4). Available at Retrieved 2014.08.04.
DOI
|
8 |
Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer : The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240-267.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Roberts, J. (2000). From know-how to show-how : Questioning the role of information and communication technologies in knowledge transfer. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12(4), 429-443.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer : A basis for competitive advantage in rirms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150-169.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Avrahami, D., & Hudson, S. E. (2006). Communication characteristics of instant messaging : Effects and predictions of interpersonal relationships. Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, New York, NY, 505-514.
|
12 |
Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), vii-xvi.
|
13 |
Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing : Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators : Social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
|
14 |
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows : Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA : Analytic Technologies.
|
15 |
Cantu, L. Z., Criado, J. R., & Criado, A. R. (2009). Generation and transfer of knowledge in IT-related SMEs. Journal of Knowledge, 13(5), 243-256.
DOI
|
16 |
Cho, H. K., Trier, M., & Kim, E. (2005). The use of instant messaging in working relationship development : A case study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4). Available at Retrieved 2014.08.04.
DOI
|
17 |
Chow, W. S., & Chan, L. S. (2008). Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information and Management, 45(7), 458-465.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
|
19 |
Davison, R. M., Ou, C. X. J., & Martinsons, M. G. (2013). Information technology to support informal knowledge sharing. Information Systems Journal, 23(1), 89-109.
DOI
|
20 |
Deloitte. (2009). Resistance to change, budget constraints and cost-cutting delay new technologies into the workplace : Deloitte Poll. Available at Retrieved 2014.08.04.
|
21 |
Soo, C., Devinney, T., Midgley, D., & Deering, A. (2002). Knowledge management : Philosophy, processes, and pitfalls. California Management Review, 44(4), 129-150.
DOI
|
22 |
Sabidussi, G. (1966). The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika, 31(4), 581-603.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Scott, J. (1988). Social network analysis : A handbook. Sage Publications, London.
|
24 |
Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 125-134.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams : Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239-1251.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making : Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1467-1478.
DOI
|
27 |
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practices within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27-43.
DOI
|
28 |
Teigland, R. (2000). Communities of practice at an Internet firm : Netovation vs. on-time performance. In E. L. Lesser, M. A. Fontaine, & J. A. Slusher (Eds.), Knowledge and Communities : Resources for the Knowledge-Based Economy (pp. 151-178). Woburn, MA : Butterworth-Heinemann.
|
29 |
Teigland, R., & Wasko, M. (2009). Knowledge transfer in MNCs : Examining how intrinsic motivations and knowledge sourcing impact individual centrality and performance. Journal of International Management, 15(1), 15-31.
|
30 |
Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks : Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Garrett, R. K., & Danziger, J. N. (2007). IM = interruption management? Instant messaging and disruption in the workplace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). Available at Retrieved 2014.08.04.
|
32 |
Gibbert, M., & Krause, H. (2002). Practice exchange in a best practice marketplace. In : T.H. Davenport & G.J.B. Probst (Eds), Knowledge Management Case Book : Siemens Best Practices, Publicis Corporate Publishing, Erlangen, Germany.
|
33 |
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
34 |
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995) Multivariate data analysis with readings (4th ed.) Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., USA.
|
35 |
Hammer, M. (1984). Explorations into the meaning of social network interview data. Social Networks, 6(4), 341-371.
DOI
|
36 |
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem : The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
37 |
Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties : The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organizations : Structures, Form and Action (pp. 216-239). Boston, MA : Harvard Business School Press.
|
38 |
Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust : The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1494.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
39 |
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis : Methods and applications. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
|
40 |
Tracey, P., Clark, G. L., & Lawton Smith, H. (2004). Cognition, learning and European regional growth : An agent-centred perspective on the "new" economy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(1), 1-18.
DOI
|
41 |
Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks : Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213-238.
DOI
ScienceOn
|