Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5865/IJKCT.2013.3.2.067

A Balance of Primary and Secondary Values: Exploring a Digital Legacy  

Cushing, Amber L. (Cushing Information Consulting)
Publication Information
International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology / v.3, no.2, 2013 , pp. 67-94 More about this Journal
Abstract
This exploratory research explores the concept of a digital legacy as a general concept and as a collection of digital possessions with unique characteristics. The results reported in this article are part of a larger study. In Cushing (2013), the author identified the characteristics of a digital possession. In this study, these characteristics of a digital possession were utilized to explore how the characteristics of several digital possessions could form a collection, or a digital legacy. In addition to being explored as a collection of digital possessions, data was collected about the general concept of a digital legacy. In part I of the study, 23 participants from three age groups were interviewed about their general concept of a digital legacy. Five general characteristics describing a digital legacy were identified. In part II of the study, interview data from Cushing (2013) was used to create statements describing digital possessions. The statements were classified utilizing the archival concept of primary and secondary values, as well as the consumer behavior concepts of self extension to possessions and possession attachment. Primary value refers to the purpose for which the item was created, while secondary value refers to an additional value that the participants can perceive the item to hold, such as a perception that an item can represent one's identity. Using standard Q method procedure, 48 participants were directed to rank their agreement with 60 statements (written on cards), along a distribution of -5 to +5, according to the characteristics of the digital possession they would most like to maintain for a digital legacy. The ranked statements were analyzed using Q factor analysis, in order to perceive the most common statements associated with maintaining digital possessions for a digital legacy. Q method results suggested that most individuals described the digital possessions they wanted to maintain for a digital legacy using various combinations of characteristics associated with primary and secondary values. This suggests that while some participants will respond to personal archiving based on the concept of preserving identity (a perceived secondary value), this will not appeal to everyone. Information professional could consider this difference in appeal when marketing personal archiving assistance to patrons.
Keywords
Digital Legacy; Digital Possessions; Personal Digital Collections; Maintaining; Personal Archives; Identity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139-168.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Belk, R. W. (1995). Collecting in a consumer society. London: Routledge.
3 Belk, R. W., Wallendorf, M., Sherry Jr., J. F., & Holbrook, M. B. (1991). Collecting in a consumer culture. In Highways and buyways: Naturalistic research from the consumer behavior odyssey (pp. 178-215). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
4 Cox, R. J. (2008). Personal archives and a new archival calling : readings, reflections and ruminations. Duuth, Minn: Litwin Books. Available at http://search.lib.unc.edu/search?R=UNCb5932535
5 Cunningham, A. (1994). The archival management of personal records in electronic form: Some suggestions. Archives and Manuscripts, 22(1), 94-105.
6 Cunningham, A. (1996). Beyond the pale? the 'flinty' relationship between archivists who collect the private records of individuals and the rest of the archival profession. Archives and Manuscripts, 24(1), 20-26.
7 Cushing, A. L. (2012). Possessions and self extension in digital environments: Implications for maintaining personal information. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
8 Cushing, A. L. (2013). "It's the stuff that speaks to me": Exploring the characteristics of digital possessions. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 64(8), 1723‐1734.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Furby, L. (1978). Possession in humans: an exploratory study of its meaning and motivation. Social Behavior and Personality, 6(1), 49-65.   DOI
10 John, J. L., Rowland, I., Williams, P., & Dean, K. (2010). Digital lives: personal digital archives for the 21st century, an initial synthesis. London, UK: British Library.
11 Jones, W. (2008). Keeping found things found: the study and practice of personal information management. Boston: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
12 Kaye, J., Vertesi, J., Avery, S., Dafoe, A., David, S., Onaga, L., ... Pinch, T. (2006). To have and to hold: Exploring the personal archive. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 275-284). Presented at the Conference on human factors in computing systems, Montreal, Quebec, Canada: ACM.
13 Kirk, D. S., & Sellen, A. (2010). On human remains: Values and practice in the home archiving of cherished objects. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 17(3). doi: 10.1145/1806923.1806924   DOI
14 Levinson, D. J. (1990). A theory of life structure development in adulthood. In C. N. Alexander & E. J. Langer (Eds.), Higher Stages of Human Development. New Yokr, NY: Oxford University Press.
15 Marshall, C.C. (2008a). Rethinking personal digital archiving part I: Four challenges from the field. D‐Lib Magazine, 14(3/4).
16 McKemmish, S. (1996). Evidence of me. Archives and Manuscripts, 24(1), 28-45.
17 Marshall, C.C. (2008b). Rethinking personal digital archiving part II: Implications for services, applications and institutions. D-Lib Magazine, 14(3/4).
18 Marshall, Catherine C., Bly, S., & Brun-Cottan, F. (2006). The long term fate of our digital belongings: Toward a service model for personal archives. In Proceedings of Archiving 2006 (pp. 25-30). Presented at the Archiving 2006, Ottawa, Canada: Society for Imaging Science and Technology.
19 McIntosh, W. D., & Schmeichel, B. (2004). Collectors and collecting: A social psychological perspective. Leisure Sciences, 26(1), 85-97. doi: 10.1080/01490272639   DOI   ScienceOn
20 McKeown, B., & Thomas D. (1988). Q Methodology. Newbury Park, NJ: Sage Publications.
21 Miles, M.B, & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
22 Muensterberger, W. (1994). Collecting: An unruly passion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23 Odom, W., Zimmerman, J., & J Forlizzi. (2011). Teenagers and their virtual possessions: design opportunities and issues. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1491-1500). Presented at the CHI, Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM Press.
24 Paquet, L. (2000). Appraisal, acquisition and control of personal electronic records: From myth to reality. Archives and Manuscripts, 28(2), 71-91.
25 Pearce, S. M. (1992). Museums, objects and collections: A cultural study. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
26 Schellenberg, T. R. (1956). Modern archives: Principles and techniques. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27 Pearce‐Moses, R. (2005). SAA: Glossary of Archival and Records Terminology. A glossary of archival and records terminology. Available at http://www.archivists.org/glossary/ Retrieved 2012.07.18.
28 Petrelli, D., Van den Hoven, E., & S. Whittaker. (2009). Making history: The intentional capture of future memories. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1723-1732). Presented at the CHI09, New York, NY: ACM Press.
29 Rigby, D., & Rigby, E. (1944). Lock, stock and barrel: The story of collecting. Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott.
30 Schlinger, M. J. (1969). Cues on Q technique. Journal of Advertising Research, 9(3), 53-60.
31 Schultz, S. E. (1989). An empirical investigation of person‐material possession attachment. University of Cinncinnati, Cincinatti, OH.
32 Schultz, S. E., Kleine, R., & Kernan, J. (1989). "These are a few of my favorite things" Toward an explication of attachment as a consumer behavior construct. Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 359-366.
33 Tan, D., Berry, E., Czerwinski, M., Bell, G., Gemmell, J., Hodges, S., ... Wood, K. (2007). Save everything: supporting human memory with a personal digital lifetime store. In Personal Information Management (pp. 90-107). Seattle, Washington: University of Washington Press.
34 Thomas, S. (2007). PARADIGM: A practical approach to the preservation of personal digital archives. Manchester, UK: Bodleian Library.
35 Whittaker, S., & Hircshberg, J. (2001). The character, value and management of personal paper archives. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 150‐180). Presented at CHI01, Seattle, WA: ACM Press