Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2014.27.6.660

Genetic Diversity and Population Genetic Structure of Cephalotaxus koreana in South Korea  

Hong, Kyung Nak (Division of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Kim, Young Mi (Division of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Park, Yu Jin (Division of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Lee, Jei Wan (Division of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Plant Resources / v.27, no.6, 2014 , pp. 660-670 More about this Journal
Abstract
The Korean plum yew (Cephalotaxus koreana Nakai) is a shade-tolerant, coniferous shrub. The seeds have been used as a folk medicine in Korea, and an alkaloid extract (HTT) is known to have anticancer properties. We estimated the genetic diversity of 429 trees in 16 populations in South Korea using 194 polymorphic amplicons from seven combinations of AFLP primer-restriction enzymes. The average number of effective alleles and the percentage of polymorphic loci were 1.37 and 79.4%, respectively. Shannon's diversity index and the expected heterozygosity were 0.344 and 0.244, respectively. We divided 16 populations into four groups on the UPGMA dendrogram and the PCA biplot. The first two principal components explained 84% of the total genetic variation. Genetic differentiation between populations explained 14% of total genetic variation, and the remaining 86% came from difference between individuals within populations, as determined by an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA). However, the genetic differentiation did not correlate with the geographic distance between populations from the Mantel test. The Bayesian statistics, which are comparable to Wright's $F_{ST}$ and Nei's $G_{ST}$, were ${\theta}^I=0.406$ and ${\theta}^{II}=0.172$, respectively. The population genetic diversity was slightly lower, and the strength of genetic differentiation was much weaker, than the average of those plants having similar life histories, as assessed using arbitrary marker systems. We discuss strategies for the genetic conservation of the plum yew in Korea.
Keywords
Genetic differentiation; AFLP; Cluster analysis; Bayesian inference; Conservation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Wilshusen, P.R., S.R. Brechin, C.L. Fortwangler and P.C. West. 2002. Reinventing a square wheel: critique of a resurgent "protection paradigm" in international biodiversity conservation. Society and Natural Resources 15:17-40.   DOI
2 Tripp, K.E. 1995. Cephalotaxus: the plum yews. Arnoldia (Spring) 25-39.
3 Xing, Z., Y. Liu and D. Du. 2001. Genetic diversity and population differentiation of Cephalotaxus mannii Hk.f. populations. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research 19(3):220-224 (Abstract in English).
4 Zhang, D., M.A. Dirr and R.A. Price. 2000. Discrimination and genetic diversity of Cephalotaxus accessions using AFLP markers. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 125(4):404-412.
5 Vos, P. et al.. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23(21):4407-4414.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Lang, X., J. Su, Z. Zhang and S. Lu. 2011. The taxonomic history and original literatures arrangements of living Cephalotaxus (Cephalotaxaceae). Am. J. Plant Sciences 2:496-506.   DOI
7 Lee, C.B. 1974. Dendrology. Hyangmoonsa, Seoul, Korea. p. 235 (in Korean).
8 Leimu, R. and M. Fischer. 2008. A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLos One 3(12):e4010. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004010.   DOI
9 Li, Y., Z. Zhou and G. Jin. 2008. Genetic diversity for different provenances of Cephalotaxus fortunei. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 44(2):64-69 (Abstract in English).
10 Mariette, S. et al.. 2002. Sampling within the genome for measuring within-population diversity: trade-offs between markers. Mol. Ecol.11:1145-1156.   DOI
11 Oh, H.K., Y.H. Han and S.H. Choi. 2011. Conservation management methods and classification type of flora in the Bongamsa (Temple) area, Mungyeong. Korean. J. Env. Eco. 25(4):447-469 (in Korean).   과학기술학회마을
12 Mba, C. and J. Tohme. 2005. Use of AFLP markers in surveys of plant diversity. Methods in Enzymology 395:177-201.   DOI
13 Nakagoshi, N. and S. Wada. 1990. Population structure and succession in temperate forests of southwestern Japan. Vegetatio 87:73-84.   DOI
14 Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583-590.
15 Nei, M. and A.K. Roychoudhury. 1974. Sampling variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance. Genetics 76:379-390.
16 Nybom, H. 2004. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Molecular Ecology 13:1143-1155.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Nybom, H. and I.V. Bartish. 2000. Effects of life history traits and sampling strategies on genetic diversity estimates obtained with RAPD markers in plants. Evolution and Systematics 3(2):93-114.
18 Oostermeijer, J.G.B., S.H. Luijten and J.C.M. den Nijs. 2003. Integrating demographic and genetic approaches in plant conservation. Biological Conservation 113:389-398.   DOI
19 Peakall, R. and P.E. Smouse. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6:288-295.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Pertoldi, C., R. Bijlsma and V. Loeschcke. 2007. Conservation genetics in a globally changing environment: present problems, paradoxes and future challenges. Biodiversity and Conservation 16(14):4147-4163.   DOI
21 Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens and P. Donnelly. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945-959.
22 Pruett, C.L. and K. Winker. 2008. The effects of sample size on populaton genetic diversity estimates in song sparrows Melospiza melodia. J. Avian Biol. 39:252-256.   DOI
23 Hamrick, J.L., M.J.W. Godt and S.L. Sherman-Broyles. 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests 6:95-124.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Rieseberg, L., T. Vines and N. Kane. 2012. Editorial 2012. Molecular Ecology 21:1-22.   DOI
25 Sisodiya, P.S. 2013. Plant derived anticancer agents: a review. Int. J. Res. Dev. Pharm. L. Sci. 2(2):293-308.
26 Holsinger, K.E., P.O. Lewis and D.K. Dey. 2002. A Bayesian approach to inferring population structure from dominant markers. Molecular Ecology 11:1157-1164.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Foll, M., M. A. Beaumont and O. Gaggiotti. 2008. An approximate Bayesian computation approach to overcome biases that arise when using amplified fragment length polymorphism markers to study population structure. Genetics 179:927-939.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Farjon, A., C.N. Page and N. Schellevis. 1993. A preliminary world list of threatened conifer taxa. Biodiversity and Conservation 2:304-326.   DOI
29 Hao, D.C., P.G. Xiao, B.L. Huang, G.B. Ge and L. Yang. 2008. Interspecific relationships and origins of Taxaceae and Cepahlotaxaceae revealed by partitioned Bayesian analyses of chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Plant Syst. Evol. 276:89-104.   DOI
30 Hong, Y.P., K.J. Cho, Y.Y. Kim, E.M. Shin and S.K. Pyo. 2000. Diversity of I-SSR variants in the populations of Torreya nucifera. J. Korean For. Soc. 89(2):167-172 (in Korean).
31 Jump, A.S., R. Marchant and J. Penuelas. 2008. Environmental change and the option value of genetic diversity. Trends in Plant Science 14(1):51-58.
32 Jung, M.S., J.O. Hyun, U.K. Lee and E.S. Baik. 2010. Biotic and abiotic factors affecting homoharringtonine contents of Cephalotaxus koreana Nakai. Korean J. Plant Res. 23(2):172-178 (in Korean).   과학기술학회마을
33 Kim, C.H. and J.G. Jeong. 2008. Study on use of native medicinal woody plants in the Chonnam area. Korean J. Herbology 23(1):39-44 (in Korean).   과학기술학회마을
34 Jung, M.S., J.O. Hyun, W.Y. Lee, H.J. Lee and S. Kosal. 2005. Variation of homoharringtonine contenst from eight natural populations of Korean native plumyew trees (Cephalotaxus koreana). J. Korean For. Soc. 94(6):397-401 (in Korean).
35 KFRI (Korea Forest Research Institute). 2013. Estimating Genetic Diversity of Natural Populations in Some Forest Tree Species for in situ Conservation. KFRI, Seoul, Korea. p. 105 (in Korean).
36 KPNI (Korean Plant Names Index) Committee. 2008. Korean Plant Names Index. http://www.nature.go.kr (in Korean).
37 Kong, W.S. 1995. The distribution of conifers and taxads in time and space in the Korean Peninsula. J. Korean Geographical Society 30(1):1-15 (in Korean).   과학기술학회마을
38 Kong, W.S. 2004. Species compostion and distributuion of native Korean conifers. J. Korean Geographical Society 39(4):528-543 (in Korean).
39 Kramer, A.T. and K. Havens. 2009. Plant conservation genetics in a changing world. Trends in Plant Science 14(11):599-607.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Kwon, H.Y. and Z.S. Kim. 2002. I-SSR variation within and among Korean populations in Taxus cuspidata. J. Korean For. Soc. 91(5):654-660.   과학기술학회마을
41 Lang, X., J. Su, S. Lu and Z. Zhang. 2013. A taxonomic revision of the genus Cephalotaxus (Taxaceae). Phytotaxa 84(1):1-24.
42 Abdelkafi, H. and B. Nay. 2012. Natural products from Cephalotaxus sp.: chemical diversity and synthetic aspects. Nat. Prod. Rep. 29:845-869.   DOI
43 Du, D., J. Su, Y. Fu, P. Zhou, W. Ma and Z. Xiang. 2002. Genetic diversity of Cephalotaxus mannii, a rare and endangered plant. Acta Botanica Sinica 44(2):193-198 (Abstract in English).
44 Baek, K.S. et al.. 2013. A study on actual conditions and management strategies of local forest protected areas for genetic resources - focused on Borimsa temple forest (Torreya nucifera Forest) in Jangheung-gun. J. Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 17(2):15-23 (in Korean).
45 Campbell, D., P. Duchesne and L. Bernatchez. 2003. AFLP utility for population assignment studies: analytical investigation and empirical comparison with microsatellites. Mol. Ecol. 12:1979-1991.   DOI
46 Chang, C.S., H. Kim and K.S. Chang. 2011. Illustrated Encyclopedia of Fauna and Flora of Korea. Vol 43. Woody Plants. Design Post. Seoul, Korea. p. 509 (in Korean).
47 Chen, S., Y. Sima and B. Fang. 2003. The genetic diversity of Cephalotaxus oliveri and its endangered causes. J. Northwest Forestry University 18(2):29-32 (Abstract in English).
48 Cheng, Y., R.G. Nicolson, K. Tripp and S.M. Chaw. 2000. Phylogeny of Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae genera inferred from chloroplast matK gene and nuclear rDNA ITS region. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 14(3):353-365.   DOI
49 Cho, H.J., B.C. Lee and J.H. Shin. 2004. Forest vegetation structure and species composition of the Baekdudaegan mountain range in South Korea. J. Korean For. Soc. 93(5):331-338 (in Korean).
50 Evanno, G., S. Regnaut and J. Goudet. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14:611-2620.