Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2012.25.6.753

Phylogenetic Relationships of the Korean Trigonotis Steven (Boraginaceae) Based on Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) and Nuclear Ribosomal Markers (nrDNA) Region  

Trinh, Ngoc Ai (Department of Life Science, Yeungnam University)
Nguyen, Hien Thi Thanh (Department of Life Science, Yeungnam University)
Park, Seon Joo (Department of Life Science, Yeungnam University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Plant Resources / v.25, no.6, 2012 , pp. 753-761 More about this Journal
Abstract
We performed phylogenetic analyses of a total of 21 acessions covering 5 species in the Korean Trigonotis and one outgroup species using nuclear ribosomal ITS and chloroplast rbcL, matK, ndhF sequences. Outgroup were chosen from the closely related genus Lithospermum zollingeri. Both parsimony and Bayesian Inference methods were used to reconstruct the evolutionary history of the group. The evidence collected indicated that phylogenetic relationships among Korean Trigonotis species are unresolved based on nuclear marker (ITS), as the same as based on separated chloroplast sequences. While the phylogenetic relationships of Korean Trigonotis species almost clearly were resolved in combined chloroplast sequences. Thus, the members of Trigonotis coreana can be distinguished to the members of Trigonotis peduncularis in combined cpDNA sequences and Trigonotis nakaii was treated as a synonymed to Trigonotis radicans var. sericea. In addition, the MP and BI analysis showed Trigonotis icumae as sister of the remained Korean Trigonotis species based on combined molecular markers (BI: PP = 1).
Keywords
nrDNA; cpDNA and Triogonotis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Swofford, D.L 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods), Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
2 Swofford, D.L. 2003. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony Version 4.0b10 for 32-bit Microsoft Windows. Sinauer, Sunderland.
3 Sweeney, P.W. and R.A. Price. 2000. Polyphyly of the genus Dentaria (Brassicaceae): evidence from trnL intron and ndhF sequence data. Syst. Bot. 25(3):468-478.   DOI
4 Xiang, Q.Y., D.E. Soltis, D.R. Morgan, and P.S. Soltis. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships of Cornus L. sensu lato and putative relatives inferred from rbcL sequence data. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80:723-734.   DOI
5 Wang, C.J. 1982. Taxanomic and phytogeographic studies on Chinese species Trigonotis Steven. Acta. Bot. Yunnanica 4:31-45.
6 White, T.J., T. Bruns, S. Lee and J. Taylor. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. A guide to methods and applications, UK edition. Academic Press, San Diego, USA. pp. 315-322.
7 Wolfe, K.H. 1991. Protein-coding genes in chloroplast DNA: compilation of nucleotide sequences, data base entries, and rates of molecular evolution. In Bogorad, L. and I.K. Vasil (eds.), Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants. Academic Press, San Diego, USA. 7:467-482.
8 Zhu, G.L., H. Riedl, and R. Kametin. 1995. Trigonotis. In Wu, Z.Y. and P.H. Raven (eds.). Flora of China. Science Press, Beijing, China and Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, USA. 16:361-373.
9 Maddison, D.R. and W.P. Maddison. 2005. MacClade 4: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Version 4.08. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
10 Mason-Gamer, R.J and E.A. Kellogg. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Biol. 45(4):524-545.   DOI
11 Maximowicz, C.J. 1872. Courtes diagnoses des nouvelles plantes du Japon et de la Mandijourie. Bulletin de I'Academic Imperiale des Sciences St. Petersbourg. 17:417-456.
12 Mayol, M. and J.A. Rosselo'. 2001. Why nuclear ribosomal DNA spacer (ITS) tell different stories in Quercus. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 19:167-176.   DOI
13 Muller, K.F, T. Borsch and K.W. Hilu. 2006. Phylogenetic utility of rapidly evolving DNA at high taxonomical levels: contrasting matK, trnT-F, and rbcL in basal angiosperms. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 41:99-117.   DOI
14 Nakai, T. 1917. Trigonotis Japono-Coreanae. Botanical Magazine Tokyo 31:215-218.   DOI
15 Newmaster, S.G., A.J. Fazekas and S. Ragupathy. 2006. DNA barcoding in the land plants: evaluation of rbcL in a multigene tired approach. Can. J. Bot. 84:335-341.   DOI
16 Ohwi, J. 1953. Flora of Japan. Smithsonian Inst., Washington. USA.
17 Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Olmstead, R.G. and J.A. Sweere. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematic: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst. Biol. 43:467-481.   DOI
19 Olmstead, R.G., P.A. Reeves and A.C. Yen. 1998. Patterns of sequence evolution and implications for parsimony analysis of chloroplast DNA. Kluwer, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. pp. 164-187.
20 Popov, M.G. 1953. Boraginaceae in B.K. Shischkin Flora of the U.S.S.R.. Moskva and Leninggrad. 19:97- 691.
21 Rokas, A., B.L. Williams, N. King and S.B. Carroll. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425:798-840.   DOI
22 Sang, T., D.J. Crawford and T.F. Stuessy. 1997. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 84:1120-1136.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Savolainen, V., M.W. Chase, S.B. Hoot, C.M. Morton, D.E. Soltis, C. Bayer, M.F. Fay, A.Y. De Bruijn, S. Sullivan and Y.L. Qiu. 2000a. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based upon a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst. Biol. 49:306-362.   DOI
24 Simmons, M.P. and H. Ochoterena. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence based analyses. Syst. Biol. 49:369-381.   DOI
25 Small, R.L., R.C. Cronn and J.F. Wendel. 2004. Use of the nuclear genes for phylogeny reconstruction in plants. Aust. Syst. Bot. 17:145-170.   DOI
26 Soltis, D.E., E.V. Mavrodiev, J.J. Doyle, J. Rausher and P.S. Soltis. 2008. ITS and ETS sequence data and phylogeny reconstruction in allopolyploids and hybrid. Syst. Biol. 33:7-20.
27 Baldwin, B.G. 1992. Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the Composite. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:3-16.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Bailey, C.D., T.G. Carr, S.A. Harris and C.E. Hughes. 2003. Characterization of angiosperm nrDNA polymorphism, paralogy, and psedogenes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29:435- 455.   DOI
29 Chase, M.W, R.S. Cowan, P.M. Hollingsworth, G. Petersen, O. Seberg, T. Jorgsensen, K.M. Cameron and M. Carine. 2007. A proposal for a standardized protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon 56:295-299.
30 Azuma, T., T. Kajita, J. Yokoyama and H. Ohashi. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of Salix (Salicaceae) based on rbcL sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 87:67-75.   DOI
31 Cunningham, C.W. 1997. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined?. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14(7): 733-740.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 De Candolle, A.P. 1846. Trigonotis. In Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis X. Parisiis.
33 Doyle, J. and J. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19:11-15.
34 Feline, G.N. and J.A. Rosello. 2007. Better the devil you know? Guidelines for insightful utilization of nrDNA ITS in species- level evolutionary studies in plants. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 44:911-919.   DOI
35 Hilu, K.W, T. Borsch, K. Muller, D.E. Soltis, P.S. Soltis, V. Savolainen, M.W. Chase, M.P. Powell, L.A. Alice and R. Evans. 2003. Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information. Amer. J. Bot. 90:1758-1776.   DOI
36 Hipp, A.L., J.C. Hall and K.J. Sytsma. 2004. Congruence versus phylogenetic accuracy: revisiting the incingruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 53(1):81-89.   DOI
37 Kress, W..J. and D.L. Erickson. 2007. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS One pp. e508.
38 Huelsenbeck, J.P., D.M. Hills and R. Jones. 1996. Parametric bootstrapping in molecular phylogenies: application and performance. Molecular zoology: advances, strategies, and protocols. 19-45. Wiley, New York, USA.
39 Jovanovic', V. and D. Cvetkovic'. 2010. Implications of rbcL phylogeny for historical biogeography of genus Mercurialis L.: Estimating age and center of origin. Arch. Biol. Sci. 62:603-609.   DOI
40 Johnston, I.M. 1937. Studies in the Boraginaceae, XII. J. Arnold Arboretum 18:10-25.
41 Lahaye, R., M. Van der Bank, D. Bogarin, J. Warner, F. Pupulin, G. Gigot, O. Maurin, S. Duthoit, T.G. Barraclough and V. Savolainen. 2008. DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. PNAS. 105:2923-2928.   DOI
42 Les, D.H. 1994. Molecular systematics and taxonomy of lake cress (Neobeckia aquatica Brassicaceae), an imperiled aquatic mustard. Aquatic Botany 49:149 - 165.   DOI   ScienceOn
43 Lee, W.T. 1996. Standard illustrations of Korean Plants. Academy Press, Seoul, Korea. pp. 929-930 (in Korean).