Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4490/ALGAE.2005.20.3.239

Experimental Hybridization between Some Marine Coenocytic Green Algae Using Protoplasms Extruded in vitro  

Klochkova, Tatyana A. (Department of Biology, Kongju National University)
Yoon, Kang-Sup (Department of Chemistry, Kongju National University)
West, John A. (School of Botany, University of Melbourne)
Kim, Gwang-Hoon (Department of Biology, Kongju National University)
Publication Information
ALGAE / v.20, no.3, 2005 , pp. 239-249 More about this Journal
Abstract
Some marine coenocytic green algae could form protoplasts from the extruded protoplasm in seawater. The dissociated cell components of the coenocytic protoplasm could be reunited into live cells and, hence, the formation of new species by mixing protoplasms from different coenocytic cells has been predicted. Our results showed that an incompatibility barrier was present during protoplast formation in coenocytic algae to exclude foreign inorganic particles or alien cell components. No inorganic particles or alien cell components were incorporated into protoplast formed spontaneously in seawater. Even when the inorganic particles or alien cell and/or cell component were incorporated into protoplast in some experimental condition, they were expelled from the protoplast or degenerated within several days. A species-specific cytotoxicity was observed during protoplast hybridization between the protoplasms of Bryopsis spp. and Microdictyon umbilicatum. The cell sap of M. umbilicatum could destroy the cell components of Bryopsis spp., but had no effect on Chaetomorpha moniligera. Species C. moniligera and Bryopsis did not affect protoplast generation of either species. The wound-induced protoplast formation in vitro might have evolved in some coenocytic algae as a dispersal method, and the incompatibility barrier to alien particles or cell and/or cell component could serve as a protective mechanism for successful propagation.
Keywords
coenocytic green algae; cytotoxicity; hybridiration; protoplasm; protoplast formation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Burr F.A. and West J.A. 1970. Light and electron microscope observations on the vegetative and reproductive structures of Bryopsis hypnoides. Phycologia 9: 17-37   DOI
2 Dodge J.D. 1973. The fine structure of algal cells. Academic press, London, New York. 261 pp
3 Ephrussy B. 1972. Hybridization of somatic cells. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ. 175 pp
4 Fowke L.C., Rennie P.J., Kirkpatrick J.W. and Constabel F. 1976. Ultrastructure of fusion products from soybean cell culture and sweet clover leaf protoplasts. Planta 130: 39-45   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Kim G.H., Klotchkova T.A. and Kang Y.-M. 2001. Life without a cell membrane: regeneration of protoplasts from disintegrated cells of the marine green alga Bryopsis plumosa. J. Cell Sci. 114: 2009-2014
6 Klochkova T.A., Kang S.-H., Cho G.Y., Pueschel C.M., West J.A. and Kim G.H. Biology of a terrestrial green alga Chlorococcum sp. (Chlorococcales, Chlorophyta) collected from the Miruksazi stupa in Korea. Phycologia in press
7 Klotchkova T.A., Chah O.-K., West J.A. and Kim G.H. 2003. Cytochemical and ultrastructural studies on protoplast formation from disintegrated cells of a marine green alga Chaetomorpha aerea (Chlorophyta). Eur. J. Phycol. 38: 205-216   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Kobayashi K. and Kanaizuka Y. 1985. Reunification of subcellular fractions of Bryopsis into viable cells. Plant Sci. 40: 129-135   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Markert C.L. and Petters R.M. 1978. Manufactured hexaparental mice show that adults are derived from three embryonic cells. Science 202: 56-58   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Tatewaki M. and Nagata K. 1970. Surviving protoplasts in vitro and their development in Bryopsis. J. Phycol. 6: 401-403
11 Turner J.B. and Friedmann E.I. 1974. Fine structure of capitular filaments in the coenocytic green alga Penicillus. J. Phycol. 10: 125-134
12 Fowke L.C., Rennie P.J., Kirkpatrick J.W. and Constabel F. 1975. Ultrastructural characteristics of intergenetic protoplast fusion. Can. J. Bot. 53: 272-278   DOI
13 Kim G.H., Klotchkova T.A. and West J.A. 2002. From protoplasm to swarmer: regeneration of protoplasts from disintegrated cells of the multicellular marine green alga Microdictyon umbilicatum (Chlorophyta). J. Phycol. 38: 174-183   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Kajita S., Matsui C., Syono K., Suzuki M. and Nagata T. 1980. Fine structure of fusion bodies formed between pea root nodule and tobacco mesophyll protoplasts. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 97: 233-240   DOI
15 Fowke L.C.. Constabel F. and Gamborg O.L. 1977. Fine structure of fusion products from soybean cell culture and pea leaf protoplasts. Planta 135: 257-266   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Gleba Y.Y. and Sytnik K.M. 1984. Protoplast fusion. Genetic engineering in higher plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo. 220 pp
17 Ishizawa K. and Wada S. 1979. Growth and phototropic bending in Boergesenia rhizoid. Plant Cell Physiol. 20: 973-982
18 Kalthoff K. 2001. Analysis of biological development. INTERNATIONAL EDITION ISBN 0-07-118078-8. 790 pp
19 Kim G.H. and Klotchkova T.A. 2004. Development of the protoplasts induced from wound-response in fifteen marine green algae. Jpn. J. Phycol. 52(Supplement): 111-116
20 Menzel D. 1987. Fine structure of vacuolar inclusions in the siphonous green alga Chlorodesmis fastigiata (Udoteaceae, Caulerpales) and the contribution to plug formation. Phycologia 26: 205-221   DOI
21 Pak J.Y., Solorzano C., Arai M. and Nitta T. 1991. Two distinct steps for spontaneous generation of subprotoplasts from a disintegrated Bryopsis cell. Plant Physiol. 96: 819-825   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Rietema H. 1973. The influence of day length on the morphology of the Halicystis parvula phase of Derbesia tenuissima (De Not.) Crn. (Chlorophyceae, Caulerpales). Phycologia 12: 11-16   DOI
23 Ringerts N.S. and Savage R.E. 1976. Cell hybrids. Academic press, New York. 366 pp
24 Sidorov V.A., Gleba Y. and Sytnik K.M. 1978. Ultrastructural study of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. cultured protoplasts and arabidopsis+tobacco fusion products. Arabidopsis Inf. Serv. 15: 70-77