Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4490/ALGAE.2003.18.2.157

Effect of the Sewage and Wastewater Plant Effluent on the Algal Growth Potential in the Nakdong River Basin  

Seo,Jeong-Gwan
Lee,Jae-Jeong
Yang,Sang-Yong
Jeong,Ik-Gyo
Publication Information
ALGAE / v.18, no.2, 2003 , pp. 157-167 More about this Journal
Abstract
Effect of the effluent of the sewage and wastewater plants on the algal growth was investigated from the 19 plants located in the Nakdong river basin. Most of the samples showed high values of the algal growth potential (AGP) when they were mixed with natural river water at 20% of final concentration. At 20% of the mixing ratio, the mixed effluents of sewage and wastewater showed 3.5 and 1.8 times higher AGP than those of the natural river water. The higher AGP values are attributable to the high contents of phosphorus and ammonium in the effluent. The mixing ratio of effluents of the discharge/river flow was highest in the Kumho River (42.8%) followed by the middle of Nakdong River (22.7%), Kam Stream (13.9%), Byungsung Stream (13.3%), Yangsan Stream (7.9%), and Young River (5.4%). Comparison of the trophic state of the effluents with natural river water indicated that the effluents showed higher trophic values than natural water. Concentrations of total phosphorus, total nitrogen and conductivity in the effluents were 12.3, 4.9 and 5.3 times higher than the those found in natural river water respectively. The AGP values were highly related with the trophicity of the water especially on the concentrations of phosphate and ammonium. Toxicities of the treated sewage water, wastewater and livestock waste water tested by the luminescent bacteria, Vibrio fischerii were generally low.
Keywords
algal growth potential; Nakdong river basin; sewage and waste water plant effluent; Vibrio fischerii;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 신재기,이옥회,황순진,조경제. 2001. 경안천에서 하수처리수와 생하수에 대한 algal bioassay. 한국육수학회지 34: 192-198
2 위인선,이종빈,주현수. 1991. 주암댐 및 이사천댐 유역의 조류생산 잠재력 조사에 관한 연구. 한국환경생물학회지 9: 104-112
3 조경제,신재기. 1997. 낙동강 중하류에서 무기 N . P 영양염의 변통 한국 육수학회지 30: 85-96
4 조규송,강인구,권오길,김범철,나규환,안태석,이종범,이인기,이해금,전상호,최준길. 1991. 호소환경조사법. pp. 271-281
5 주현수,위인선 정미량. 1994. 광주천 수계에 있어서의 AGP에 관한 연구. 한국환경생물학회지 12: 125-136
6 최성헌,이인선,변명섭,박지형,방규철,신기식. 2002. 큰물벼룩,발광박테리아를 이용한 산업폐수 수질평가(I). 국립환경연구원보 24: 471-481
7 환경부. 2001. 수질오염공정시험법
8 환경부. 2001. 2002. 하수도통계. pp. 154-171
9 환경부. 2002. 물관리종합대책
10 박혜경,이문호,유재근. 1992. AGP spike test에 의한 국내 대형댐호의 조류생산 제한영양염의 추정 수질보전학회지 8: 159-166
11 신재기,조경제. 1999. 낙동강에서 AGP 에 의한 수질평가. 한국육수학회지 32: 349-357
12 환경부. 2001. 2002 공장폐수의 발생과 처리
13 APHA . AWWA . WPCF. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 16th Ed. American Public Health Association
14 Box J.D. 1983. Temporal variation in algal bioassays of waer from two productive lakes Arch. Hydrobiol. (suppl.) 67: 81-103   DOI
15 Munawar M., Mudroch A., Munawar J.F. and Thomas R.L. 1983. The impact of sediment associated contaminants from the Niagara River mouth on various size assemblages of phytoplankton. J. Great Lakes Res.9: 303-313   DOI
16 Nilssen J.P. 1978. Eutrophication, minute algae and inefficient grazers. Mem. 1st Ital. Idrobiol 36: 121-138
17 Nishijawa K. and Chihara M. 1979. Methods of Phycological Studies. Kourits Press in Japan. pp.453-459
18 Watanabe M. and Kasai F. 1988. NIES Collection List of Strains. 2nd edition. 31 p
19 김성한,윤인길,권오섭. 1997 회분식 배양에 의한 서낙동강 저서층의 영양염류 용출. 한국육수학회지 30: 281-288
20 구준호. 2001. 조류성장잠재력 시험을 이용한 하수처리장 유출수의 환경영향평가. 부경대학교 공학석사학위논문. 44 pp
21 낙동강환경관리청(낙환청). 2002 낙동강유역 환경지도. pp. 107-112
22 Lopez-Lopez E. and Davalos L. 1998. Algal growth potential and nutrient limitation in a tropical river-reservoir system of the Central Plateau, Mexico. Aquatic Ecosystem Health Management 1: 345-351   DOI
23 Davalos L. 1996. Phytoplankton and bacterioplankton stress by sediment boren pollutants. J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health. 5: 99-105   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Davalos L., Lind O. and Doyle R.D. 1989. Evaluation of phytoplankton limiting factors in lake Chapala Mexico: turbidity and spatial temporal variation in algal assay respond. Lake Reserv. Manage. 5: 99-104   DOI