Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2012.45.3.335

An Analysis on the Social Diffusion of Geo-technologies Outcome : Comparison of Recognition between Experts and Nonexperts  

Kim, Chan-Souk (Cheongju University)
Lee, Hyun-Seon (Cheongju University)
Kim, Seong-Yong (Korea Institute Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM))
Publication Information
Economic and Environmental Geology / v.45, no.3, 2012 , pp. 335-346 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study investigates the differences of recognition about geo-technologies outcome between experts and nonexperts. Based on these findings, this study would offer suggestions for future communication strategies on research outcome in a various field of scientific research as well as KIGAM. The result shows that there are differences between expert and nonexpert in the level of recognition about geoscience research outcome. The findings of this study emphasize the needs for recognizing the concept that geo-technologies are directly related to people's lives and external communication is necessary.
Keywords
geo-technology outcome; social diffusion; internal public; external public;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lee, M.W. (1989). A study on audience about the science communication: The realities of acceptance and characteristic of Science technology information. Science Communication Symposium of The Korean Society for Journalism & Communication Studies, p.57-99.
2 Oh, C.S. (2002). A study on promoting the popularization of science & technology by mass media. Seoul: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning.
3 Park, S.C. (2006). On-line public relations of the research institutes in science & technology sector. Science and Technology Policy, v.15, n.5, p.76-82.
4 Song, H.R., Kim, W.J. and Cho, H.M. (2005). A study on audience's awareness about the media reports of science technology risk : focused on the genetically modified organism(GMO) case. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, v.49, n.3, p.105-128.
5 The Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion (2005). A survey on the usage of internet in 2004. Seoul: The Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion.
6 Choi, Y.H. (1990). A study on the accuracy of science reporting on newspaper in Korea. Seoul: The Ministry of Science-Technology.
7 Kim, C.S. and Kim, S.Y. (2008). A study on communication programs of geo-technology R&D outcome using the SMTCR model. Econ. Environ. Geol., v.41, n.2, p.267-273.   과학기술학회마을
8 Chung, D.C. (1996). A study on the accuracy of science reporting. Seoul: The Korean Press Institute.
9 Hong, H.Y. and Kim, H.S. (2004). A study on reporting process of science information. Proceedings of the 2004 Fall Conference of the Korean Society for Journalism & Communication Studies, 51-53.
10 Kim, C.S., Kim, S.Y. and Lee, J.R. (2007). A study on public relations strategy and program on geo-technology R&D outcome. Econ. Environ. Geol., v.40, n.6, p.797- 804.   과학기술학회마을
11 Kim, C.S. (2009). Environmental change and methodology of public relations. Korean Journal of Social Science, v.31, n.1, p.82-86
12 Kim, H.S. (1987). Considerations and policies for science communication media. Seoul : Korea Science and Engineering Foundation.
13 Kim, H.S. (1995). Science journalism. The East-West Channel, 6, p.68-81.
14 Kim, H.S. (1999). The processes of public science and science communication : A new conceptual explication. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, v.43, n.4, p.79-109.
15 Lee, H.S. (1989). A study on the science coverage of newspaper in Korea. Science Communication Symposium of The Korean Society for Journalism & Communication Studies, p.23-56.
16 Lee, J.R. (2004). Study on the PR campaign strategies and practical programmes of science and technology for Korean government. Collection of Theses, 15, p.149-178.
17 Lee, K.Y. (1996). A study on the current status and problems of science communication. The East-West Channel, 6, p.82-101.