Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15683/kosdi.2022.6.30.252

Research Trends on External Event Identification and Screening Methods for Safety Assessment of Nuclear Power Plant  

Kim, Dongchang (Department of Convergence & Fusion System Engineering, Kyungpook National University)
Kwag, Shinyoung (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hanbat National University)
Kim, Jitae (Division of Safety Inspection, Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety)
Eem, Seunghyun (Department of Convergence & Fusion System Engineering, Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Society of Disaster Information / v.18, no.2, 2022 , pp. 252-260 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: As the intensity and frequency of natural hazards are increasing due to climate change, external events that affecting nuclear power plants(NPPs) may increase. NPPs must be protected from external events such as natural hazards and human-induced hazards. External events that may occur in NPPs should be identified, and external events that may affect NPPs should be identified. This study introduces the methodology of identification and screening methods for external events by literature review. Method: The literature survey was conducted on the identification and screening methods of external events for probabilistic safety assessment of NPPs. In addition, the regulations on the identification and screening of external events were investigated. Result: In order to minimize the cost of external event impact analysis of nuclear power plants, research on identifying and screening external events is being conducted. In general, in the identification process, all events that can occur at the NPPs are identified. In the screening process, external events are selected based on qualitative and quantitative criteria in most studies. Conclusions: The process of identifying and screening external events affecting NPPs is becoming important. This paper, summarize on how to identify and screen external events for a probabilistic safety assessment of NPPs. It is judged that research on bounding analysis and conservative analysis methods performed in the quantitative screening process of external events is necessary.
Keywords
Nuclear Power Plants; Natural Hazard; External Events; Identification; Screening; Climate Change;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 USNRC (2003). Processing Applications for Early Site Permits. USNRC, RS-002, Washington, D.C., US.
2 Alzbutas, R., Maioli, A. (2008). "Risk zoning in relation to risk of external events (application to IRIS design)." International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, Vol. 8, No. 1-2, pp. 104-122.   DOI
3 Ham, E.G., Lee, S.I. (2021). "A study on the earthquake safety assessment of energy storage facilities according to climate change." Journal of the Society of Disaster Information, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 226-235.   DOI
4 IAEA (1984). Site Survey for Nuclear Power Plants: A Safety Guide. IAEA, IAEA Safety Seris No. 50-SG-S9, Vienna, Austria.
5 Alzbutas, R., Urbonas, R., Augutis, J. (2001). Risk and Sensitivity Analysis in Relation to External Events. International Conference Nuclear Energy in Central Europe 2001, Slovenia, pp. 308.1-308.13.
6 Huffman, K. (2015). Identification of External Hazards for Analysis in Probabilistic Risk Assessment. EPRI, EPRI Report 1022997, Palo Alto.
7 IAEA. (1996). External Man-Induced Events in Relation to Nuclear Power Plants: A Safety Standard. IAEA, IAEA Safety Series No. 50-SG-D5, Vienna, Austria.
8 Jordaan, S. M., Siddiqi, A., Kakenmaster, W., Hill, A. C. (2019). "The climate vulnerabilities of global nuclear power." Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 3-13.   DOI
9 ASME/ANS (2013). Addenda to ASME/ANS RA-S-2008 Standard for Level 1/Large Early Release Frequency Probabilistic Risk Assessement for Nuclear Power Plant Application. ASME, ASME/ANS RA-Sb-2013, New York, US.
10 CNSC (2008). Site Evaluation for New Nuclear Power Plants. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, CNSC RD-346, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
11 IAEA (1981). Extreme Meteorological Events in Nuclear Power Siting, Excluding Tropical Cyclones. IAEA, IAEA Safety Series 50-SG-S11A, Vienna, Austria.
12 IAEA (1995). Treatmen of External Hazards in Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA Safety Series No. 50-P-7, Vienna, Austria.
13 IAEA (2002). External Human Induced Events in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. NS-G-3.1, Vienna, Austria.
14 NEA/CSNI. (2009). Probabilistic Safety Analysis (PSA) of Other External Events Than Earthquake. Nuclear Energy Agency Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations, NEA/CSNI/R(2009)4, Paris, France.
15 IAEA (2003). External Events Excluding Earthquakes in the Design of Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA, IAEA Safety Guide No. NS-G-1.5, Vienna, Austria.
16 IAEA (2003). Meteorological Events in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA, IAEA Safety Guide No. NS-G3.4, Vienna, Austria.
17 Kawatsuma, S., Fukushima, M., Okada, T. (2012). "Emergency response by robots to Fukushima-Daiichi accident: summary and lessons learned." Industrial Robot: An International Journal, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 428-435.   DOI
18 USNRC (1983). PRA Procedures Guide: A Guide to the Performance of Probabilistic Risk Assessments for Nuclear Power Plants. USNRC, NUREG/CR-2300, Washington, D.C., US.
19 Kim, N.-W., Lee, J.-W., Joo. G-H., Kim,S.-H. (2020). Korean Climate Change Assessment Report 2020(The scientific basis for climate change). Korea Meteorological Administration.
20 IAEA (2003). Flood Hazard for Nuclear Power Plants on Coastal and River Sites. IAEA, IAEA Safety Guide No. NS-G-3.5, Vienna, Austria.
21 Knochenhauer, M., Louko, P. (2003). Guidance for External Events Analysis. SKI Report 02:27, Swedish Nuclear Ins Pectorate.
22 Ryu, S.-R. (2022). "A study on the flooding risk assessment of energy storage facilities according to climate change." Journal of The Korean Society of Disaster Information, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 10-18.
23 USNRC (1975). Reactor Safety Study. USNRC, WASH-1400, Washington, D.C., US.
24 USNRC (1991). Procedural and Submittal Guidance for the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities. USNRC, NUREG-1407, Washington, D.C., US.
25 USNRC. (1981). Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants, LWR Edition. USNRC, NUREG-0800, Washington, D.C., US.
26 USNRC (1987). Evaluation of External Hazards to Nuclear Power Plants in the United States. USNRC, NUREG/CR-5042, Washington, D.C., US.
27 Van Dorsselaere, J.P., Bentaib, A., Albiol, T., Fichot, F., Miassoedov, A., Starflinger, J., Niedermayer, G. (2020). "Safety assessments and severe accidents, impact of external events on nuclear power plants and on mitigation strategies." EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies, Vol. 6, 39.   DOI
28 ENSI (2009). Guideline for Swiss Nuclear Installations Probabilistic Safety Analysis (PSA): Quality and Scope. Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate, ENSI-A05/e, Brugg, Swiss.
29 IAEA (2003). Extreme External Events in the Design and Assessment of Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA, IAEA TECDOC-1341, Vienna, Austria.
30 Bae, Y.-J., Lee, H.-J., Jeong, B-W., Jeong, W.-C. (2020). Korean Climate Change Assessment Report 2020(Influence and adaptation to climate change). Ministry of Environment.
31 USNRC (2009). An Approach for Determining the Technical Adequacy of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Result for Risk-informed Activities, Revision 2. USNRC, Regulatory Guide-1.200, Washington, D.C., US.