Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2021.28.2.146

Analysis of Concordance Between Parent Proxy and Child Self-report of KIDSCREEN-10 Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire in an Elementary School-based Wellness Program: A Pilot Focus Group Study  

Choi, Bongsam (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Woosong University)
Publication Information
Physical Therapy Korea / v.28, no.2, 2021 , pp. 146-153 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Researchers have previously commenced examining the degree of concordance between parent proxy and child self-reports on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of many disease and impairment populations. Objects: To explore the differences between parent proxy and child self-reports on the HRQOL using Korean version of KIDSCREEN-10 questionnaires for applying to elementary school children and their parents who participated for a school-based wellness program. Methods: The focus groups were recruited for a school-based wellness program by implementing the following wellness services: 1) referring to a screening session for detecting potential posture-related musculoskeletal problems and 2) recommending home exercise programs. Before a primary field testing for the program, two focus groups were formed with a group of 9 parents and their 9 elementary school children aged 8-10 years of age. The parent proxy and child self-report versions of KIDSCREEN-10 questionnaires were administered to both groups after completion of the wellness program. Item level Rasch rating scale analysis was applied to compute logit scales of KIDSCREEN-10 questionnaire. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and scatterplot of item difficulty between two reports were analyzed. Results: For fit statistics of parent proxy report, all items except 4 items (i.e., psychological well-being, mood/emotions, self-perception, parent relation) were found to be acceptable. For fit statistics of child self-report, all items except 3 items (i.e., psychological well-being, autonomy and home life) were acceptable. The relationship between two reports using ICCs were ranging from weak to very strong at p = 0.05 (i.e, ICCs = 0.011 to 0.905). Scatterplot analysis between two reports showed a major disparity on self-perception item at 95% confidence intervals. Conclusion: Both item level analyses and ICC comparisons provided a disparity between parent proxy and child self-reports of the HRQOL on self-perception item after competing a school-based wellness program. Therapist should consider the item as part of the HRQOL assessment.
Keywords
Proxy; Quality of life; Self report; Treatment outcome;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Goldthorpe J, Epton T, Keyworth C, Calam R, Armitage C. Who is responsible for keeping children healthy? A qualitative exploration of the views of children aged 8-10 years old. BMJ Open 2019;9(5):e025245.   DOI
2 Ravens-Sieberer U; Kidscreen Group Europe. The Kidscreen questionnaires: quality of life questionnaires for children and adolescents: handbook. Lengerich: Pabst Science; 2006.
3 Ravens-Sieberer U, Erhart M, Rajmil L, Herdman M, Auquier P, Bruil J, et al.; European KIDSCREEN Group. Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: a short measure for children and adolescents' well-being and health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 2010;19(10):1487-500.   DOI
4 Jokovic A, Locker D, Guyatt G. How well do parents know their children? Implications for proxy reporting of child health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 2004;13(7):1297-307.   DOI
5 Brunner HI, Klein-Gitelman MS, Miller MJ, Trombley M, Baldwin N, Kress A, et al. Health of children with chronic arthritis: relationship of different measures and the quality of parent proxy reporting. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51(5):763-73.
6 Davis E, Nicolas C, Waters E, Cook K, Gibbs L, Gosch A, et al. Parent-proxy and child self-reported health-related quality of life: using qualitative methods to explain the discordance. Qual Life Res 2007;16(5):863-71.   DOI
7 Theunissen NC, Vogels TG, Koopman HM, Verrips GH, Zwinderman KA, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, et al. The proxy problem: child report versus parent report in health-related quality of life research. Qual Life Res 1998;7(5):387-97.   DOI
8 Bastiaansen D, Koot HM, Ferdinand RF. Determinants of quality of life in children with psychiatric disorders. Qual Life Res 2005;14(6):1599-612.   DOI
9 Eiser C, Morse R. Can parents rate their child's health-related quality of life? Results of a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2001;10(4):347-57.   DOI
10 Liang MH, Lew RA, Stucki G, Fortin PR, Daltroy L. Measuring clinically important changes with patient-oriented questionnaires. Med Care 2002;40(4 Suppl):II45-51.
11 Hong SD, Yang JW, Jang WS, Byun H, Lee MS, Kim HS, et al. The KIDSCREEN-52 quality of life measure for children and adolescents (KIDSCREEN-52-HRQOL): reliability and validity of the Korean version. J Korean Med Sci 2007;22(3):446-52.   DOI
12 McHorney CA. Health status assessment methods for adults: past accomplishments and future challenges. Annu Rev Public Health 1999;20:309-35.   DOI
13 Gamper EM, Groenvold M, Petersen MA, Young T, Costantini A, Aaronson N, et al.; EORTC Quality of Life Group. The EORTC emotional functioning computerized adaptive test: phases I-III of a cross-cultural item bank development. Psychooncology 2014;23(4):397-403.
14 Muller M, Haenni Hoti A. Item analysis of the KIDSCREEN-10 using Rasch modelling. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020;18(1):342.
15 Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New York: Routledge; 2015;26-7.
16 Evans JD. Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole; 1996;43-56.
17 Clark GF, Watling R, Parham LD, Schaaf R. Occupational therapy interventions for children and youth with challenges in sensory integration and sensory processing: a school-based practice case example. Am J Occup Ther 2019;73(3):7303390010p1-8.
18 Ravens-Sieberer U, Auquier P, Erhart M, Gosch A, Rajmil L, Bruil J, et al.; European KIDSCREEN Group. The KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries. Qual Life Res 2007;16(8):1347-56.   DOI
19 Tercedor P, Villa-Gonzalez E, Avila-Garcia M, Diaz-Piedra C, Martinez-Baena A, Soriano-Maldonado A, et al. A school-based physical activity promotion intervention in children: rationale and study protocol for the PREVIENE Project. BMC Public Health 2017;17(1):748.   DOI
20 Kugel J, Hemberger C, Krpalek D, Javaherian-Dysinger H. Occupational therapy wellness program: youth and parent perspectives. Am J Occup Ther 2016;70(5):7005180010p1-8.   DOI
21 Solans M, Pane S, Estrada MD, Serra-Sutton V, Berra S, Herdman M, et al. Health-related quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: a systematic review of generic and disease-specific instruments. Value Health 2008;11(4):742-64.   DOI
22 Erhart M, Ottova V, Gaspar T, Jericek H, Schnohr C, Alikasifoglu M, et al.; HBSC Positive Health Focus Group. Measuring mental health and well-being of school-children in 15 European countries using the KIDSCREEN-10 Index. Int J Public Health 2009;54 Suppl 2:160-6.
23 Linacre JM. Teaching Rasch measurement. Rasch Meas Trans 2017;31(2):1630-1.
24 Stevanovic D, Tadic I, Novakovic T, Kisic-Tepavcevic D, Ravens-Sieberer U. Evaluating the Serbian version of the KIDSCREEN quality-of-life questionnaires: reliability, validity, and agreement between children's and parents' ratings. Qual Life Res 2013;22(7):1729-37.   DOI