Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2017.24.4.046

Comparison of the Foot Muscle EMG and Medial Longitudinal Arch Angle During Short Foot Exercises at Different Ankle Position  

Yoon, Hyeo-bin (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University)
Kim, Ji-hyun (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University)
Park, Joo-hee (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University)
Jeon, Hye-seon (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Physical Therapy Korea / v.24, no.4, 2017 , pp. 46-53 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: The MLA is supported by both the abductor hallucis (ABH) and the extrinsic muscles. Insufficient muscular support may lower the MLA when the body's weight is applied to the foot. The short foot exercise (SFE) is effective in increasing the height of the MLA for people with flat feet. Most of the research related to the SFE has simply evaluated the efficiency of the exercise using enhanced ABH electromyography (EMG) activation. Since the tibialis anterior (TA), peroneus longus (PER), and ABH are all involved in supporting the MLA, a new experiment design examining the EMG of the selected muscles during SFE should be applied to clarify its effect. Objects: Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the effect of the SFE in different ankle position on the MLA angle and the activation of both the intrinsic and extrinsic muscles and to determine the optimal position. Methods: 20 healthy subjects and 12 subjects with flat feet were recruited from Yonsei University. The surface EMG and camera were used to collect muscle activation amplitude of TA, PER, and ABH and to capture the image of MLA angle during SFE. The subjects performed the SFE while sitting in three different ankle positions-neutral (N), dorsiflexion (DF) at 30 degrees, and plantar flexion (PF) at 30 degrees. Results: ABH EMG amplitudes were significantly greater in N and DF than in PF (p<.05). Muscle activation ratio of TA to ABH was the lowest in PF (p<.05). MLA angle in both groups significantly decreased in PF (p<.01). The TA and ABH was activated at the highest level in DF. However, in PF, subjects significantly activated the ABH and PER with relatively low activation of TA. Conclusion: Therefore, researchers need to discuss which SFE condition most effectively use the arch support muscle for flat foot.
Keywords
Flat foot; Medial longitudinal arch; Short foot exercise;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Chen YC, Lou SZ, Huang CY, et al. Effects of foot orthoses on gait patterns of flat feet patients. Clinical biomechanics. 2010;25(3):265-270.   DOI
2 Easley ME, Trnka HJ. Current concepts review: Hallux valgus part 1: Pathomechanics, clinical assessment, and nonoperative management. Foot & ankle international. 2007;28(5):654-659.   DOI
3 Fiolkowski P, Brunt D, Bishop M, et al. Intrinsic pedal musculature support of the medial longitudinal arch: An electromyography study. The Journal of foot and ankle surgery. 2003;42(6):327-333.   DOI
4 Franco AH. Pes cavus and pes planus: Analyses and treatment. Physical Therapy. 1987;67(5):688-694.   DOI
5 Incel NA, Genc H, Erdem H, et al. Muscle imbalance in hallux valgus: An electromyographic study. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation. 2003;82(5):345-349.   DOI
6 Jung DY, Kim MH, Koh EK, et al. A comparison in the muscle activity of the abductor hallucis and the medial longitudinal arch angle during toe curl and short foot exercises. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2011;12(1):30-35.   DOI
7 Kamiya T, Uchiyama E, Watanabe K, et al. Dynamic effect of the tibialis posterior muscle on the arch of the foot during cyclic axial loading. Clinical Biomechanics. 2012;27(9):962-966.   DOI
8 Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Kendall HO. Muscles, testing and function: Testing and function. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 1983.
9 Kuo YL, Tully EA, Galea MP. Video analysis of sagittal spinal posture in healthy young and older adults. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics. 2009;32(3):210-215.   DOI
10 Lee JH, Cynn HS, Yoon TL, et al. Differences in the angle of the medial longitudinal arch and muscle activity of the abductor hallucis and tibialis anterior during sitting short-foot exercises between subjects with pes planus and subjects with neutral foot. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 2016;29(4):809-815.   DOI
11 Murley GS, Landorf KB, Menz HB, et al. Effect of foot posture, foot orthoses and footwear on lower limb muscle activity during walking and running: A systematic review. Gait & posture. 2009a;29(2):172-187.   DOI
12 Murley GS, Menz HB, Landorf KB. Foot posture influences the electromyographic activity of selected lower limb muscles during gait. Journal of foot and ankle research. 2009b;2(1):35.   DOI
13 Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system: Foundations for rehabilitation. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2013:590-594.
14 Rose G. Disorder of the foot and ankle, pes planus. Mh jahss, ed. WB Saunders, Philadelphia. 1991:892-919.
15 O'connor KM, Hamill J. The role of selected extrinsic foot muscles during running. Clinical Biomechanics. 2004;19(1):71-77.   DOI
16 Pohl MB, Hamill J, Davis IS. Biomechanical and anatomic factors associated with a history of plantar fasciitis in female runners. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 2009;19(5):372-376.   DOI
17 Prentice WE, Kaminski TW. Rehabilitation techniques for sports medicine and athletic training. McGraw-Hill New York, 2004:630-634.
18 Tsai LC, Yu B, Mercer VS, et al. Comparison of different structural foot types for measures of standing postural control. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2006;36(12):942-953.   DOI
19 Banwell HA, Mackintosh S, Thewlis D. Foot orthoses for adults with flexible pes planus: A systematic review. Journal of foot and ankle research. 2014;7(1):23.   DOI
20 Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with imagej. Biophotonics international. 2004;11(7):36-42.
21 Bertani A, Cappello A, Benedetti M, et al. Flat foot functional evaluation using pattern recognition of ground reaction data. Clinical Biomechanics. 1999;14(7):484-493.   DOI