Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2015.22.4.051

Content Validity of a Korean-Translated Version of a Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale: A Pilot Study  

Kim, Gyoung-mo (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Division of Health Science, Baekseok University)
Publication Information
Physical Therapy Korea / v.22, no.4, 2015 , pp. 51-61 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study were to translate the Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB) scale into Korean and to verify the content validity by utilizing a back-translation method with a view to assessing balance function and the risk of falling in a clinical research setting. This research was conducted in six steps. First, three Korean physical therapists translated the FAB scale into Korean. Second, two bilingual professors of physical therapy and a physical therapist evaluated translation conformity of Korean-translated FAB scale. In the third and fourth steps, twelve physical therapists evaluated the degree of translation comprehension, and a translator back-translated the Korean FAB scale into the original language. Fifth, a bilingual professor of physical therapy and two native speakers evaluated the technical and conceptual equivalence between the original and translation versions. In this process, inappropriate translated items were revised using recommended substitute words or sentences, and all items were evaluated on the basis of three points or more on a rating scale in terms of translation comprehension, and the technical and conceptual equivalence of the back-translation. In the sixth and last step, the translation verification committee completed the final Korean version. The above process indicated that the content validity of the Korean-translated FAB scale was established by means of systematic translation methods, and it can therefore be used to assess balance function and the risk of falls in a clinical research setting.
Keywords
Back-translation; Content validity; Fullerton advanced balance scale;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics Society, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons panel on Falls Prevention. Guideline for the prevention of falls in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(5):664-672.   DOI
2 Baker DI, King MB, Fortinsky RH, et al. Dissemination of an evidence-based multicomponent fall risk-assessment and -management strategy throughout a geographic area. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):675-680.   DOI
3 Berg KO, Maki BE, Williams JI, et al. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(11):1073-1080.
4 Boulgarides LK, McGinty SM, Willett JA, et al. Use of clinical and impairment-based tests to predict falls by community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther. 2003;83(4):328-339.
5 Brauer SG, Burns YR, Galley P. A prospective study of laboratory and clinical measures of postural stability to predict community-dwelling fallers. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(8):M469-M476.   DOI
6 Brislin RW. Back translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1970;1(3):185-216.   DOI
7 Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: The IQOLA project approach. International quality of life assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):913-923.   DOI
8 Candell GL, Hulin CL. Cross-language and cross-cultural comparisons in scale translation: Independent sources of information about item nonequivalence. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1986;17(4):417-440.   DOI
9 Chae SY, Jo SJ, Kwon HC, et al. A study on a korean-translated version of the psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS). 2008;16(3):71-85.
10 Custers JW, Hoijtink H, van der Net J, et al. Cultural differences in functional status measurement: Analyses of person fit according to the rasch model. Qual Life Res. 2000;9(5):571-578.   DOI
11 Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, et al. Functional reach: A new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol. 1990;45(6):M192-M197.   DOI
12 Fortinsky RH, Baker D, Gottschalk M, et al. Extent of implementation of evidence-based fall prevention practices for older patients in home health care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(4):737-743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01630.x   DOI
13 Hall CD, Schubert MC, Herdman SJ. Prediction of fall risk reduction as measured by dynamic gait index in individuals with unilateral vestibular hypofunction. Otol Neurotol. 2004;25(5):746-751.   DOI
14 Hernandez D, Rose DJ. Predicting which older adults will or will not fall using the fullerton advanced balance scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(12):2309-2315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2008.05.020   DOI
15 Jung HY, Park JH, Shim JJ, et al. Reliability test of korean version of berg balance scale. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2006;30(6):611-618.
16 Horak FB, Wrisley DM, Frank J. The balance evaluation systems test (BESTest) to differentiate balance deficits. Phys Ther. 2009;89(5):484-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080071   DOI
17 Hulin CL, Drasgow F, Komocar J. Applications of item response theory to analysis of attitude scale translations. J Appl Psychol. 1982;67(6):818-825.   DOI
18 Jones PS, Lee J, Philips LR, et al. An adaptation of brislin's translation model for cross-cultural research. Nurs Res. 2001;50(5):300-304.   DOI
19 Kim AY, Lim EY. Effects of different types of practice in cross-cultural test adaptation of affective measures. Korean Psychology. 2003;22(1):89-113.
20 Kim EJ. Assessment of balance and posture in brain disorders. Brain Neurorehabil. 2013;6(2):58-63.   DOI
21 Klein PJ, Fiedler RC, Rose DJ. Rasch analysis of the fullerton advanced balance (FAB) scale. Physiother Can. 2011;63(1):115-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2009-51   DOI
22 Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Current characteristics of injury among older adults by injury mechanism [Internet]. Cheongju, 2009 Oct 16 [Cited 2015 Oct 4]. Available from: http://www.cdc.go.kr/CDC/info/CdcKrInfo0301.jsp?menuIds=HOME001-MNU1132-MNU1138-MNU0037-MNU1380&cid=12356
23 Ku JH, Park DW, Kim SW, et al. Cross-cultural differences for adapting translated five-item version of international index of erectile function: Results of a korean study. Urology. 2005;65(6):1179-1182.   DOI
24 Lim YJ, Park KY, Yoo EY. Pilot study to establish content validity of a korean-translated version of a sensory profile. J Korean Acad Occup Ther. 2007;15(2):25-42.
25 Lee AH, Park HS, Ahn IS, et al. A study on a korean-translated version of the cognitive failures questionnaire. J Korean Acad Occup Ther. 2011;19(4):117-129.
26 Lee JA, Yi CH, Park SY, et al. Application of rasch analysis to the korean berg balance scale. Phys Ther Korea. 2006;13(3):49-56.
27 Legters K. Fear of falling. Phys Ther. 2002;82(3):264-272.
28 McDermott MA, Palchanes K. A process for translating and testing a quantitative measure for cross-cultural nursing research. J N Y State Nurses Assoc. 1992;23(4):12-15.
29 Neuman A, Greenberg DF, Labovitz DR, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the sensory profile: Establishing linguistic equivalency of the hebrew version. Occup Ther Int. 2004;11(2):112-130.   DOI
30 Nevitt MC, Cummings SR, Kidd S, et al. Risk factors for recurrent nonsyncopal falls. A prospective study. JAMA. 1989;261(18):2663-2668.   DOI
31 Newton RA. Balance screening of an inner city older adult population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(6):587-591.   DOI
32 Park SY. Combining two scales to assess risk factors of falling in community-dwelling elderly persons: A preliminary study. Phys Ther Korea. 2008;15(2):44-53.
33 Rose DJ, Lucchese N, Wiersma LD. Development of a multidimensional balance scale for use with functionally independent older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(11):1478-1485.   DOI
34 Sechrest L, Fay TL. Problems of translation in cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1972;3(1):41-56.   DOI
35 Weerdesteyn V, de Niet M, van Duijnhoven HJ, et al. Falls in individuals with stroke. J Rehabli Res Dev. 2008;45(8):1195-1213.   DOI
36 Son WS. A comprehensive approach for adapting psychological tests. Korean Psychology. 2003;22(2):57-80.
37 Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):268-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x   DOI
38 Sperber AD. Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(1):S124-S128.   DOI
39 Yoo SL. Translating and validating questionnaires for physical education research. The Journal of Education. 2003;22:203-217.