1 |
Baker D, Pynsent PB, Fairbank JCT. The oswestry disability index revisited: Its reliability, repeatability, and validity, and a comparison with the st. thomas's disability index. In: Roland MO, Jenner JR eds. Back Pain: New approaches to rehabilitation and education. New York, Manchester University Press, 1989:174-186.
|
2 |
Bjorner J, Ware Jr JE. Using modern psychometric methods to measure health outcomes. Med Outcome Trust Monitor. 1998;3:12-16.
|
3 |
Davidson M. Rasch analysis of three versions of the oswestry disability questionnaire. Man Ther. 2008;13(3):222-231.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(18):2003-2013.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Elhan AH, Oztuna D, Kutlay S, et al. An initial application of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for measuring disability in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9: 166.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Flynn KE, Dombeck CB, DeWitt EM, et al. Using item banks to construct measures of patient reported outcomes in clinical trials: Investigator perceptions. Clin Trials. 2008;5(6):575-586.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Haley SM, Gandek B, Siebens H, et al. Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(2): 275-283.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Hart DL, Cook KF, Mioduski JE, et al. Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(3):290-298.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Hol A, Vorst HCM, Mellenbergh GJ. Computerized adaptive testing for polytomous motivation items: Administration mode effects and a comparison with short forms. Appl Psychol Meas. 2007;31(5):412-429.
DOI
|
10 |
Fairbank JC. Revised oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(19): 2552.
|
11 |
Fairbank JC. The use of revised oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(21): 2846-2847.
DOI
|
12 |
Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The oswestry disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25 (22):2940-2952.
DOI
|
13 |
Fairbank JC. Use and abuse of oswestry disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(25):2787-2789.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Hambleton RK. Emergence of item response modeling in instrument development and data analysis. Med Care. 2000;38(9 Suppl):II60-II65.
|
15 |
Haley SM, Andres PL, Coster WJ, et al. Short-form activity measure for post-acute care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(4):649-660.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Haley SM, Coster WJ, Andres PL, et al. Score comparability of short forms and computerized adaptive testing: Simulation study with the activity measure for post-acute care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(4):661-666.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Jette AM, Haley SM. Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(6):339-345.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Jette AM, Haley SM, Ni P, et al. Creating a computer adaptive test version of the late-life function and disability instrument. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63(11):1246-1256.
DOI
|
19 |
Kopec JA. Measuring functional outcomes in persons with back pain: A review of back-specific questionnaires. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25 (24):3110-3114.
DOI
|
20 |
Liang MH, Lew RA, Stucki G, et al. Measuring clinically important changes with patient-oriented questionnaires. Med Care. 2002;40(4 Suppl):II45-II51.
|
21 |
Linacre JM. Winsteps rasch measurement computer program. Chicago, IL, winsteps.com, 2005:13-14.
|
22 |
McHorney CA. Generic health measurement: Past accomplishments and a measurement paradigm for the 21st century. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127: 743-750.
DOI
|
23 |
McHorney CA, Haley SM, Ware JE Jr. Evaluation of the mos sf-36 physical functioning scale (pf-10): II. Comparison of relative precision using likert and rasch scoring methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(4):451-461.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
McHorney CA. Health status assessment methods for adults: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Annu Rev Public Health. 1999;20: 309-335.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Muller U, Roder C, Greenough CG. Back related outcome assessment instruments. Eur Spine J 2006;15 Suppl 1:S25-S31.
DOI
|
26 |
Netemeyer RG, Bearden WO, Sharma S. Scaling Procedures, Issues and Applications. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, California, Sage Publications Inc., 2003:78-93.
|
27 |
Taylor SJ, Taylor AE, Foy MA, et al. Responsiveness of common outcome measures for patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(17):1805-1812.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Velozo CA, Kielhofner G, Lai JS. The use of rasch analysis to produce scale-free measurement of functional ability. Am J Occup Ther. 1999;53(1): 83-90.
DOI
|
29 |
Velozo CA, Lai JS, Mallinson T, et al. Maintaining instrument quality while reducing items: Application of rasch analysis to a self-report of visual function. J Outcome Meas. 2000;4(3):667-680.
|
30 |
Velozo CA, Peterson EW. Developing meaningful fear of falling measures for community dwelling elderly. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(9): 662-673.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Velozo CA, Choi B, Zylstra SE, et al. Measurement qualities of a self-report and therapist-scored functional capacity instrument based on the dictionary of occupational titles. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(1):109-122.
|
32 |
Velozo CA, Wang Y, Lehman L, et al. Utilizing rasch measurement models to develop a computer adaptive self-report of walking, climbing, and running. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(6):458-467.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
33 |
Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, et al. Applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(8):935-952.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
34 |
Weiss D. Improving measurement quality and efficiency with adaptive testing. Appl Psychol Meas. 1982;6(4):473-492.
DOI
|
35 |
White LJ, Velozo CA. The use of rasch measurement to improve the oswestry classification scheme. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(6):822-831.
DOI
ScienceOn
|