Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2016.61.2.092

Comparison of the Sensory Ability of Experts and Untrained Panelists to Evaluate Cooked Rince by using Five Sensory Methods  

Yoon, Mi-Ra (National Institute Crop Science, Rural Development Administration)
Kwak, Jieun (National Institute Crop Science, Rural Development Administration)
Lee, Jeong-Heui (National Institute Crop Science, Rural Development Administration)
Chun, Jaebuhm (National Institute Crop Science, Rural Development Administration)
Park, Hyang-Mee (National Institute Crop Science, Rural Development Administration)
Suh, Jung-Pil (National Institute Crop Science, Rural Development Administration)
Jang, Jae-Ki (National Institute Crop Science, Rural Development Administration)
Lee, Choon-Ki (National Institute Crop Science, Rural Development Administration)
Lee, Jeom-Sig (National Institute Crop Science, Rural Development Administration)
Publication Information
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE / v.61, no.2, 2016 , pp. 92-97 More about this Journal
Abstract
This experiment aimed to compare the sensory ability of experts and untrained to evaluate three rice varieties by using five sensory evaluation methods. All panelists showed significant differences in their sensory abilities to distinguish among Haiami, Chucheong, and Dasan 1 rice varieties when using the duo-trio test and triangle test. The expert panelists showed a clear preference in the following order: Haiami > Chucheong > Dasan 1, when using the paired comparison test, ranking test, and multiple comparison test. However, the untrained panelists showed no significant differences in their sensory ability to distinguish between the Haiami and Chucheong varieties when using the multiple comparison test. The results indicate that, for sensory evaluation of cooked rice by untrained panelists, the paired comparison test is suitable for evaluating two samples and the ranking test is suitable for evaluating more than two samples.
Keywords
cooked rice; expert panel; sensory method; untrained panel;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Amerine, M. A., R. M. Pangborn, and E. B. Roessler. 1965. Principles of sensory evaluation of food. In: Food Science and Technology Monographs. Academic Press, New York.
2 Choi, H. C. 2002. Current status and perspectives in varietal improvement of rice cultivars for high-quality and value-added products. Korean J. Crop Sci. 47(S) : 15-32.
3 Ebitani, T., T. Umemoto, and M. Yano. 2002. QTL analysis of "Mido" value, an inbreed selection index for eating quality of rice, using progenies from a cross between japonica and indica variety. Breed. Sci. 52(Suppl.1) : 371.
4 Kramer, A., G. Kahan, D. Cooper, and Papavasiliou. 1974. A non-parametric ranking method for the statistical evaluation of sensory data. Chemical Sensory and Flavor. 1 : 121-123.   DOI
5 Kim, K. O., and Y. C. Lee. 2003. Sensory evaluation of food. Hakyoun. p359.
6 Lee, J. S., N. B. Park, J. H. Lee, J. H. Cho, Y. J. Won, H. M. Park, A. Chun, J. K. Jang, W. G. Hwa, G. H. Yi, and U. S. Yeo. 2012. Optimum milling degree for improving sensory quality of cooked rice. Korean J. Crop Sci. 57(4) : 359-364.   DOI
7 Lee, J. S., J. Kwak, M. R. Yoon, J. H. Lee, E. K. Aha, H. M. Park, Y. J. Woon, J. Y. Shon, J. H. Kim, J. P. Suh, A. Chun, J. B. Chun, and J. H. Lee. 2015. Cup Arrangement Ranking Method for a Rapid and Small-Sample Sensory Evaluation of Cooked Rice. Korean J. Breed. Sci. 47(2) : 105-110.   DOI
8 National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration. 2003. Evaluate the quality and taste of rice. Suwon, Korea.
9 National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration. 2013. The 2nd workshop on analysis of rice quality, sensory evaluation and grain quality of rice. Suwon, Korea.
10 ISO. 2004a. Sensory Analysis-Methodology-Duo-trio Test. ISO Standard 10399, Copyright Office, Geneve, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
11 ISO. 2004b. Sensory Analysis-Methodology-Triangle test. ISO Standard 4120, Copyright Office, Geneve, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
12 ISO. 2005. Sensory analysis-Methodology-Paired comparison test. ISO Standard 5495, Copyright Office, Geneve, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
13 ISO. 2006. Sensory analysis-Methodology-Ranking. ISO Standard 8587, Copyright Office, Geneve, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
14 Okamoto, M. 1994. Studies on effect of chemical components on stickiness of cooked rice and their selection methods for breeding. Chugoku Agri. Report. 14 : 1-68.
15 Rousseau, B., A. Mayer, and M. O'Mahony. 1998. Power and sensitivity of the same-different test: Comparison with triangle and duo-trio method. J. Sensory Studies. 13 : 149-173.   DOI
16 Vaz-Pires, P., and P. Seixas. 2006. Development of new quality index method (QIM) schemes for cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) and broadtail shortfin squid (Illex coindetii). Food Control: 17(12) : 942-949.   DOI
17 Shim, H. M. 2012. Sensitivity of repeated duo-trio test: The effects of reference chosen by preference. Ms. D. thesis. Ewha Womans University, Seoul. p66.