Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2014.59.3.375

Development of Stable Culture Techniques for Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.)  

Kang, Chan-Ho (Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services)
Yu, Young-Jin (Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services)
Choi, Kyu-Hwan (Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services)
Kim, Hyo-Jin (Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services)
Shin, Yong-Kyu (Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services)
Lee, Gong-Jun (Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services)
Ko, Do-Young (Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services)
Song, Young-Ju (Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services)
Kim, Chung-Kon (Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services)
Publication Information
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE / v.59, no.3, 2014 , pp. 375-384 More about this Journal
Abstract
Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) was recognized as a potential source of forage. But the domestic cultivation techniques are not set standards yet. So we tested the basic culture techniques during 2012~2013 for getting a high yield and good grade forage production system. The best seeding method for mechanized planting (corn planter used) was hill seeding with $20{\times}20cm$ seeding distance. When we treated hill seeding with $20{\times}20cm$, the yield what we could get was 13,641 kg/10a and it was 32% more than that of conventional practice hill seeding with $20{\times}30cm$ seeding distance. The proper seeding date for getting high yield was May 1. In May 1, the yield per 10a was reached 13,423 kg, and it was 30% more than that of seeding at May 30. More over the crude protein content which was important factor for determinating forage nutritive value was 12.7% and it was higher 1.8% (relatively 16.5% high) than that of May 30 seeding. The most effective herbicide for kenaf was Fluazipof-p-butyl. It's herbicidal rate was 97% and phyto-toxicity was less than 5%. Regional adaptability for Jeollabuk-Do including Imsil Gun, Kochang Gun and Sunchang Gun were identified that the stable cultivation were possible in these area with average yield 12,400 kg/10a and it was about 1.7 times as compared to corn harvest.
Keywords
Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.); Seeding density; Seeding date; Herbicide;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bhardwaj, H. L., C. L., M. Rangappa, and C. L. Webber, III. 1995. Potential of kenaf as a forage. Proc. Int. Kenaf Assoc. Vonf. Irving, TX. 7 : 95-103.
2 Cahilly, G. M. 1967. Potential value of kenaf tops as a livestock feedstuff. Proc. first conf. kenaf for pulp. Gainsville, Fl. . p. 48 (Abstr.).
3 Clark, T. F. and I. A. Wolff. 1969. A search for new fiber crops, XI. Compositional characteristics of illinois kenaf at several population densities and maturities. TAPPI 52 : 2606-2116.
4 Dao, T. H., W. Lonkerd, S. Rao, R. Meyer, and L. Pellack. 1989. Kenaf in a semi-arid environment and forage quality in Oklahoma. Argon, Abstr. p. 130.
5 Hurse, L. and R. E. Bledsoe. 1989. Kenaf grown as a forage crop in Northeast Texas. Proc. Assoc. Advancement of Industria Crops Peoria, IL. p. 13 (Abstr.).
6 Evans, D. W. and A. H. Hang. 1993. Kenaf in irrigated central washington. p409-410: J. Janick and J. E. Simon (eds.), New crops. Wiley, New York.
7 Hollowell, J. E., B. S. Baldwin, and D. L. Lang. 1996. Evaluation of kenafs a potential forage for the southern Unite States. Proc. 8th Ann. Inter. Kenaf Vonf. 34-38.
8 Hovermale, C. H. 1993. Effect of row width and nitrogen rate on biomass yield of kenaf. Fourth Int. Kenaf. Conf. Proc., Int. Kenaf Assn. Ladonia, TX. p. 35-40.
9 Killinger, G. B. 1964, Kenaf a potential paper-pulp for Florida. second Int. Kenaf Conf. Palm Beach, FL. p. 54-57.
10 Killinger, G. B. 1967, Potential uses of Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Fla. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Proc. 27 : 4-11.
11 Killinger, G. B. 1969, Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) a multiuse crop. Argon. J. 61 : 734-736.
12 Miyazaki, A., W. Agata, F. Kubota, Y. Matsuda, and X. Song. 1995. Bio-production and water cleaning by plant growth with floating culture system. II. Water cleaning effects by the growth of several plant species. 6th inter. Conf. of thr conservation and management of lakes Kasumigaura. 95(1) : 560-563.
13 Phillips, W. A., S. Rao, and T. Dao. 1989. Nutritive value of immature whole plant kenaf and mature kenaf tops for growing rumminsnts. Proc. Assoc. Advancement of industrial Crops. Peoria, IL. p. 17-22.
14 Powell, G. W. and J. M. Wing. 1967. Kenaf as silage. Proc. First Conf. kenaf for pulp. Gainsville, Fl. p. 49 (Abstr.).
15 Van Soest, P. J. 1963. Use of Detergents in Analysis of Fibrous Feeds II. A Rapid Method for Determination of Fiber and Lignin. Journal of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 46(5) : 829-835.
16 Webber, C. L. III and Bledsoe. 1993. Kenaf : Production, harvesting, processing and products. p. 416-421. New crops. Wiley, New York.
17 Shin, K. S., W. J. Hwang, S. H. Lee, C. H. Kim, and Y. M. Yoon. 2012. Nutrient Value and Yield Response of Forage Crop Cultivated in Reclaimed Tidal Land Soil Using Anaerobic Liquid Fertilizer. KOREAN J. ORGANIC AGRI. 20(4) : 669-685.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
18 Suriyajantratong, W., R. E. Tucker, R. E. Sigafus, and G. E. Mitchell, Jr. 1973. Kenaf and rice straw for sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 37 : 1251-1254.
19 Swingle, R. S., A. R. Urias, J. C. Doyle, and R. L. Voigt. 1978. Chemical composition of kenaf forage and its digestibility by lambs and in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. 46 : 1346-1350.
20 Wing, J. M. 1967. Ensilability, acceptability and digestibility of kenaf. Feedstuffs 39 : 26.
21 Mark E. K. and Samuel W. N. 1992. Kenaf Tolerance to Various Postemergence Herbicides Registered for Other Crops Grown in the Delta of Mississippi. Publications Section, Office of Agricultural Communications, Division of Agriculture, Forestry, and Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, 1993 p. 5.
22 Bledsoe, V. 1999. Kenaf : Alternative fiber. Contryside Pub. Texas, USA.