Browse > Article

Stability Analysis of Some Agronomical Characters and Yield Components of Barley in Response to Irrigation Period  

Anisuzzaman, M. (Department of Botany, Rajshahi University)
Alam, Iftekhar (Division of Applied Life Sciences(BK21), Gyeongsang National University)
Rahman, A.H.M.Mahbubur (Department of Botany, Rajshahi University)
Islam, A.K.M.R. (Department of Botany, Rajshahi University)
Ahsan, Nagib (Division of Applied Life Sciences(BK21), Gyeongsang National University)
Publication Information
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE / v.52, no.4, 2007 , pp. 469-473 More about this Journal
Abstract
With the aim to analyze stability performance of six promising barley genotypes, eleven yield related characters were evaluated employing varied irrigation treatments under the tropical climate of Northern part in Bangladesh. Analysis of variance(ANOVA), phenotypic index, regression co-efficient(bi) and deviation from regression($s^2_d$) of the individual genotypes were estimated to evaluate the stable performance of the genotypes. A significant interaction was observed between the genotypes and irrigation period($G{\times}T$). Among all the genotypes, BSH-2 showed stable performance for plant height under different irrigation period, where $P>\bar{X},\;bi{\sim}1\;and\;s^2_d{\sim}0$. High phenotypic index, lower bi value and low deviations from regression were observed in case of spikelet number per spike and grain number per spike for genotype BSH-2 and plant height, spike length and harvest index per plant for BB-2 which suggest that those parameters were not usually affected by irrigation. On the other hand the genotype BSH-2 for tiller number and BB-1 for the fertile tiller number were not suitable for favorable moisture content, where $P<\bar{X},\;bi>1.0\;and\;low\;s^2_d$. Thus we suggest that genotype BSH-2 might have transmit high mean and increased phenotypic stability to the next progenies, which may consider as an ideal genotype for developing improved barely cultivars.
Keywords
barley; stability; water stress; genotype environment interaction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Costa, J. M. and G. A. Bollero. 2001. Stability analysis of grain yield in barley (Hordeum vulgare) in the US mid-Atlantic Region. Ann. Appl. Biol. 139 : 137-143   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Dudley, J. W. and R. H. Moll. 1969. Interpretation and use of estimates of heritability and genetic variances in plant breeding. Crop Sci. 9 : 257-262   DOI
3 Finlay, K. W. and G. N. Wilkinson. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14 : 742-754   DOI
4 McIntosh M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agronomy Journal. 75 : 153-155   DOI
5 Perkins, J. M. and J. L. Jinks. 1968. Environmental and genotype x environmental components of variability III. Multiple inbred lines and crosses. Heredity. 23 : 339-356   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Peterson, C. J., J. M. Moffat, and J. R. Erickson. 1997. Yield stability of hybrid vs pureline hard winter wheats in regional trials. Crop Science 37 : 116-120   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Simmonds, N. W. 1991. Selection for local adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82 : 363-367   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Tiidema, A. and E. Truve. 2004. Efficient regeneration of fertile barley plants from callus cultures of several Nordic cultivars. Hereditas. 140 : 171-176   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Worku, M., H. Zelleke, G. Taye, B. Tolessa, L. Wolde, W. Abera, A. Guta, and H. Tuna. 2001. Yield stability of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes across locations. Seventh Eastern and Southern Regional Maize Conference. 11th - 15th February, 2001. pp. 139-142
10 Eberhart, S. A. and W. A. Russell. 1966. Stability parameters of comparing varieties. Crop. Sci. 6 : 275-277   DOI
11 Alam, J. 2005. Enhancing Sustainable Development of Diverse Agriculture in Bangladesh. Centre for Alleviation of Poverty through Secondary Crops' Development in Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP-CAPSA), Bogor, Indonesia
12 Smithson, J. B. and W. Grisley. 1992. First African bean yield and adaptation nursery: Part II. Performance across environments. Network on Bean Research in Africa. Occational Publication Series No. 3B. CIAT, Der es Salaam, Tanzania
13 Lee, E. A., T. K. Doerksen, and L. W. Kannenberg. 2003. Genetic Components of Yield Stability in Maize Breeding Populations. Crop Sci. 43 : 2018-2027   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Fisher, R. A., F. R. Immer, and O. Tendin. 1932. The genetical interpretation of statistics of the third degree in the study of quantitative inheritance. Genetics. 17 : 107-124
15 Eberhart, S. A. and W. A. Russell. 1969. Yield and stability for a 10 line diallel of single-cross and double-cross maize hybrids. Crop Sci. 9 : 357-361   DOI
16 Lin, C. S., M. R. Binns, and L. P. Lefkovitch. 1986. Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Sci., 26 : 894-900   DOI
17 Shindin, I. M. and O. V. Lokteva. 2000. Evaluation of spring wheat varieties at primorskey for ecological plasticity. Ann. Wheat. Newslet. 46 : 105-106
18 Annicchiarico, P. 2002. Genotype x Environment Interactions - Challenges and Opportunities for Plant Breeding and Cultivar Recommendations. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper-174. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
19 Becker, H. C. and J. Leon. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed. 101: 1-23   DOI
20 Cannon, W. B. 1932. The wisdom of the body. Norton, New York
21 Yau, S. K. and J. Hamblin. 1994. Relative yield as a measure of entry performance in variable environments. Crop Sci. 34 : 813-817   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Arisnabarreta, S. and D. J. Miralles. 2006. Yield responsiveness in two- and six-rowed barley grown in contrasting nitrogen environments. J. Agronomy & Crop Sci. 192 : 178-185   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Kim, H-S., K-W Park, S-B Beak, J-G Kim, and J-H Num. 2005. Genetic diversity measured by RAPDs in Korean barley germplasm pools. Korean J. Crop Sci. 50 : 131-141   과학기술학회마을