Browse > Article

Effects of Biofertilizer Rate and Application Time on Growth Characters and Grain Quality of Rice  

Mintah, Lemuel Ohemeng (Division of Biosciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University)
Rico, Cyren Mendoza (Division of Biosciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University)
Shin, Dong-Il (Department of Biotechnology, Catholic University of Daegu)
Chung, Il-Kyung (Department of Biotechnology, Catholic University of Daegu)
Son, Tae-Kwon (R&D Center, ISTECH, Inc., CU Techno Center, Catholic University of Daegu)
Lee, Sang-Chul (Division of Biosciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE / v.52, no.4, 2007 , pp. 403-410 More about this Journal
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to investigate effects of application time and rate of biofertilizer alone and in combination with chemical NPK fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of rice. The biofertilizer used composted food waste as substrate and added with effective microorganism. The treatments included recommended NPK fertilizer(RF, $11-5.5-4.8kg\;10a^{-1}$), half recommended NPK fertilizer(HRF, $5.5-2.8-2.4kg\;10a^{-1}$), half recommended NPK fertilizer plus $250kg\;10a^{-1}$ biofertilizer(HRF+Bio 250) and $500kg\;10a^{-1}$ biofertilizer(HRF+Bio 500). The biofertilizer treatments were applied at 0, 5 and 10 days before transplanting(DBT). Grain yield of HRF+Bio 250 at 5 DBT($648.4kg\;10a^{-1}$) was statistically similar to the highest obtained in the RF($654.1kg\;10a^{-1}$). Tiller numbers at HRF plus biofertilizer treatments were already high during the maximum tillering stage, and were similar with that of the RF and higher than that of the HRF during heading stage. Likewise, ripening ratio at HRF plus biofertilizer treatments was similar with that of the RF and higher than that of the HRF. Furthermore, all the biofertilizer treatments improved protein content but reduced the amylose content and palatability compared to treatments with chemical NPK fertilizer alone. Thus, HRF+Bio 250 at 5 DBT can be used to save 50% chemical NPK fertilizer and at the same time obtain an improved rice grain yield and quality.
Keywords
amylose; biofertilizer; rice;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bufogle A., P. K. Bollich, R. J. Norman, J. L. Kovar, C. W. Lindau, and R. E. Macchiavelli. 1997. Rice plant growth and nitrogen accumulation in drill-seeded and water-seeded culture. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61 : 832-839   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Diamond, D. 1995. Phosphorus in soil extracts. QuikChem Method 10-115-101-1-A. Lachat Instruments, Milwaukee, WI
3 HIH, 1977. Cultivation of sturdy rice seedling by using nitrogen-fixing blue green algae. Hupeh Institute of Hydrobiology (HIH), 5 Laboratory Research group on Blue Green Algae Application. Act. Bot. Sin. 19 : 132-137
4 Jahan, M. S, A. Nishi, A. Hamid, and H. Satoh. 2002. Variation in amylopectin fine structure of Bangladesh rice cultivars. Rice Genetics Newsletter 19 : 72-73
5 Jeyabal, A. and G. Kuppuswamy. 2001. Recycling of organic wastes for the production of vermicompost and its response in rice-legume cropping system and soil fertility. European Journal of Agronomy. 15(3) : 153-170   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Juskiw, P. E., J. H. Helm, and D. F. Salmon. 2000. Forage yield and quality of monocrops and mixtures of small grain cereals. Crop Science. 40 : 138-147   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Kogut, B. and A. Frid. 1993. Comparative Evaluation of Methods of Determining Humus Concentration in Soils. Pochvovedenie 9 : 119-123. (In Russian)
8 Leesawatwong, M., S. Jamjod, J. Kuo, B. Dell, and B. Rerkasem. 2004. Nitrogen fertilizer increases seed protein and milling quality of rice. Cereal Chem. 82(5) : 588-593   DOI
9 Nishi, A., Y. Nakamura, N. Tanaka, and H. Satoh. 2001. Biochemical and genetic analysis of the effects of amylose-extender mutation in rice endosperm. Plant Physiol. 127 : 459-472   DOI
10 FADINAP, 2002. Concept and Objectives of Integrated Plant Nutrition Systems (IPNS). Fertilizer Advisory, Development and Information Network for Asia and the Pacific (FADINAP). FADINAP IPNS COMPENDIUM. Chapter 2
11 SADS, 2000. Balance nutrition for sustainable crop production. Sanjay Arora Department of Soils, Punjab Agricultural University. KrishiworldTM, The Purse of Indian Agriculture
12 USSLS. 1954. pH reading of saturated soil paste. U.S Salinity Laboratory Staff (USSLS). In L. A. Richards ed., Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils. USDA Agricultural Handbook 60. U. S Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. 102
13 Juliano, B. O., G. M. Bautista, J. C. Lugay, and A. C. Reyes. 1964. Studies on the physicochemical properties of rice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 12: 131-138   DOI
14 FFTC, 1994. Soil management for sustainable food production in Taiwan. Shan-ney Huan Hualian District Agricultural Improvement Station, Chian Town, Hualian Prefecture R.O.C. Food and Fertilizer Technology Center (FFTC)
15 Thomas, G. M. 1982. Exchangeable Cations. In A. L. Page et al. ed., Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological properties. ASA. Monograph Number 9. 159-165
16 Little, R. R., B. G. Hilder, and E. H. Dawson. 1958. Differential effect on dilute alkali on 25 varieties of milled white rice. Cereal Chem. 35 : 111-126
17 Guindo, D., R. J. Norman, and B. R. Wells. 1994. Accumulation of fertilizer nitrogen-15 by rice at different stages of development. Soil Sci. Soc, Am. J. 58 : 410-415   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Bremner, J. M. and C. S. Mulvaney. 1982. Nitrogen-total, pp 595-624. In A. L. Page et al. ed., Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological properties. ASA. Monograph Number 9
19 RBDC, 2001. Farmers' Information.Why biofertilizer? Regional Biofertilizer Development Centre, Imphal Manipur. Training Manual
20 Hemalatha, M., V. Thirumurugan, M. Joseph, R. Balasubramanian and C. Babou. 1999. Role of biofertilizer (Azospirillum spp.) with organic and inorganic sources of nitrogen on quality and yield of rice. Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai -625104. Tamil Nadu
21 Umemoto, T., M. Yano, H. Satoh, A. Shomura, and Y. Nakamura. 2002. Mapping of a gene responsible for the difference in amylopectin structure between japonica-type and indica-type rice varieties. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104 : 1-8   DOI
22 Suzuki, Y., Y. Sano and H. Y. Hirino. 1998. Isolation of rice mutant insensitive to cool temperatures in relation to amylose content. Rice Genetic Newsletters 15 : 113
23 Govindaswanmi, S. and A. K. Ghosh. 1974. Breeding for high protein content in rice. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 34(A) : 628-641
24 Kader, M. A., M. H. Mian, and M. S. Hoque. 2002. Effects of Azotobacter inoculant on the yield and nitrogen uptake by wheat. Online Journal of Biological Sciences. 2(4) : 259-261   DOI
25 Penning de Vries, F. W, A. H. M. Brunsting, and H. H. Van Laar. 1974. Products, requirements and efficiency of biosynthesis. A quantitative approach. J. Theor. Biol. 45 : 339-377   DOI
26 Broadbent, F. E. 1979. Minerallization of organic nitrogen in paddy soils. In Nitrogen and Rice. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Banos. Phillippines. pp. 105-117
27 Matsue, Y., S. Hirokazu, and Y. Uchimura. 2001. The palatability and physicochemical properties of milled rice for each grain-thickness group. Plant Prod. Sci. 4(1) : 71-76   DOI   ScienceOn