Browse > Article

Response of Grain Protein Content to Nitrogen Topdress Rate at Panicle Initiation Stage under Different Growth and Plant Nitrogen Status of Rice  

Kim, Min-Ho (Department of Plant Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
Lee, Kyu-Jong (Department of Plant Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
Lee, Byun-Woo (Department of Plant Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE / v.52, no.1, 2007 , pp. 104-111 More about this Journal
Abstract
As protein content of milled rice, generally used as a benchmark for rice eating quality, is greatly affected by N fertilization and nutrition status of rice plant, understanding its response to nitrogen rate and plant nitrogen status at different growth stage is important for recommending N fertilizer management for high quality rice production. The responses of milled-rice protein content were compared and quantified under various combinations of basal+tillering and panicle N application levels in 2001 and 2002. Protein content of milled rice was ranged from 6 to 9%, increasing significantly with increasing basal+tillering and panicle N rates. However, milled rice protein content was raised much greater by panicle N than by basal+tillering N fertilization. Even though basal+tillering N increased up to 20 kg/ha, protein content of milled rice was observed less than 7% in case that panicle N was applied below 1.8 kg/10a. Regression analysis revealed that nitrogen accumulated until harvest was partitioned with almost constant rates of 58.3% and 46.5% to panicle and milled rice, respectively. The partitioning rates was slightly but not significantly different between experimental years. Protein content of milled rice showed linear and quadratic responses to the shoot N accumulation until panicle initiation stage (PIS) ant shoot nitrogen accumulation from PIS to harvest, respectively. The increment of milled-rice protein content per unit N increase was much greater in shoot N accumulation from PIS to harvest than in that until PIS. Regardless of shoot N accumulation until PIS upto 8 kg/10a, protein content of milled rice was lower than 7% and ranged from 6.5 to 7.5% in case that shoot N accumulation from PIS to harvest was below 3.0 kg/10a and below 6.0 kg/10a respectively. It would be concluded that even under the same N accumulation until harvest milled rice protein content could be different according to the N fertilizer management and weather condition especially during ripening, providing rooms for controlling protein content by N fertilizer management without damage to grain yield.
Keywords
rice; protein; nitrogen; top-dressing;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 허문회, 김광호, 서학수. 1974. 수도 고단백 계통육성을 위한 기초적 연구 : III. 질소, 인산, 가리의 시용이 미립내 단백질 함량에 미치는 영향. 한국작물학회. 15 : 123-128
2 허문회, 박형직. 1973. 수도 고단백 계통육성을 위한 기초적 연구 : II. 성숙기간중의 잎.줄기.현미 내의 단백질함량 변이. 한국작물학회. 13 : 69-72
3 Kropff, M. J., K. G. Cassman, H, H, Vanlaar, and S. Peng. 1993. Nitrogen and yield potential of irrigated rice. Plant Soil. 156 : 391-394   DOI
4 Martre, P., P. D. Jamieson, M. A. Semenov, R. F. Zyskowski, J. R. Porter, and E. Triboi. 2006. Modelling protein content and composition in relation to crop nitrogen dynamics for wheat. European J. of Agronomy. 25(2) : 138-154   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Matsuda, H., H. Fujii, Y. Shibata, C. Kominami, S. Hasegawa, K. Oobuchi, and H. Andou. 1997. Effect of number of grains per amount of N at Heading and amount of N in grain on the protein content of milled rice. Jpn. J. Soil Scl. Plant Nutr. 68 : 501-507
6 Muchow, R. C., and T. R. Sinclair. 1995. Effect of nitrogen supply on maize yield : II. Field and model analysis. Agronomy J. 87 : 642-648   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Patrick, R. M., F. H. Hoskins, E. Wilson, and F. J. Peterson. 1974. Protein and amino acid content of rice as affected by application of nitrogen fertilizer. Cereal Chem. 51 : 84-95
8 Matsushima, S. 1995. Physiology of high-yielding rice plants from the viewpoint of yield components, In T. Matsuo, K. Kumazawa, R. Ishii, K. Ishihara, H, Hirata, Science of The Rice Plant, Volume 2 : Physiology. Food and Agriculture Policy Research Center, Tokyo, Japan. pp. 737-766
9 De Datta, S. K., W. N. Obcemea, and R. K. lana. 1972. Protein content of rice grain as affected by nitrogen fertilizer and some triazines and substituted ureas. Agron. J. 64 : 785-788   DOI
10 Heu, M. H., C. Y. Lee, J. Y. Choe, and S. I. Kim. 1969. Variability of protein content in rice grown at several different environments. Korean J. Crop Sci. 7 : 79-84   과학기술학회마을
11 Martin, M. and M. A. Fitzgerald. 2002. Proteins in rice grains influence cooking properties. Journal of Cereal Science. 36 : 285-294   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Souza, S. R., E. M. L. M. Stark, and M. S. Fernandes. 1993. Effect of supplemental nitrogen on the quality of rice pro­teins. J. Plant Nutr. 16 : 1739-1751   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Martre, P., J. R. Porter, P. D. Jamieson, and E. Tribol. 2003. Modeling grain nitrogen accumulation and protein compo­sition to understand the sink/source regulations of nitrogen remobilization for wheat. Plant Physiol. 133 : 1959-1967   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Gomez, K. A. and S. K. De Datta. 1975. Influence of environment on protein content in rice. Agronomy Journal. 67 : 565-568   DOI
15 김민호, 부금동, 이변우. 2006a. 유수분화기 식생지수와 SPAD 값에 의한 벼 질소 수비시용량 결정. 한국작물학회지. 51(5) : 386-395   과학기술학회마을
16 Islam, N., S. Inanaga, N. Chishaki, and T. Horiguchi. 1996. Effect of N top-dressing on protein content in Japonica and Indica rice grains. Cereal Chem. 42 : 225-235
17 박래경 외 38인. 1994. 작물 품질개량 육종, 박래경장장 정년퇴임기념 발간추진위원회
18 Perez, C. M., B. O. Juliano, S. P. Liboon, J. M. Alcantara, and K. G. Cassman. 1996. Effects of late nitrogen fertilizer appli­cation on head rice yield, protein content, and grain quality of rice. Cereal Chem. 73 : 556-560
19 Matsuda, H., H, Fujii, H. Ando, S. Mori, C. Kominami, and Y. Shibata. 2000. Protein content of milled rice as affected by number of grain per panicle. Jpn. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 71 : 697-699
20 Matsue, Y., K. Odahara, and M. Hiramatsu. 1994. Differences in protein content, amylose Content and palatability in relatIon to location of grains within rice panicle. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 63 : 271-277   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Nguyen, T. H., M. H, Kim, L. T Nguyen, and B. W. Lee. 2006b. Response of grain yield and milled-rice protein con­tent to nitrogen rates applied at different growth stages of rice. Korean J. Crop Sci. 51(1) : 14-25   과학기술학회마을
22 김민호, 부금동, 이변우. 2006b 벼 유수분화기 생장 및 질소영양상태에 따른 수량의 수비질소 반응. 한국작물학회지. 51(7) : 571-583   과학기술학회마을
23 Juliano, B. O., A. A. Antonio, and B. V. Esmama. 1973. Effect of protein content on the distribution and properties of rice protein. J. Sei. Food Agric. 24 : 295-306   DOI
24 Nguyen, T. H., M. H. Kim, and B. W. Lee. 2006a. Response of grain yield and milled-rice protein content to nitrogen topdress timing at panicle initiation stage of rice. Korean J. Crop Sci. 51(1) : 1-13   과학기술학회마을