Browse > Article

Genotypic Variation in Flowering and Maturing Periods and Their Relations with Plant Yield and Yield Components in Soybean  

Truong Ngon Trong (Department of Plant Science, Seoul National University)
Van Kyu-Jung (Department of Plant Science, Seoul National University)
Kim Moon-Young (Department of Plant Science, Seoul National University)
Lee Suk-Ha (Department of Plant Science, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE / v.51, no.2, 2006 , pp. 163-168 More about this Journal
Abstract
Improvement of crop yield can be achieved through understanding genetic variation in reproductive characters and its impact on yield components. The present study was performed to evaluate genetic diversity for reproductive growth characters in exotic germplasm resources and to determine the relationships between developmental and growth periods with yield and yield components in soybean cultivar groups. For phenotypic evaluation such as reproductive and agronomic traits, a total of 80 indigenous and exotic soybean cultivars collected from four different geographical regions (China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam) were grown from May to November of 2003 at the Seoul National University Farm, Suwon, Korea ($127^{\circ}02 longitude, $37^{\circ}26 latitude). Most of all the characters exhibited wide range of phenotypic variation, of which pod number, seed number, and plant yield showed greater range as compared to other characters. Korean cultivar groups showed greater diversity than the other cultivar groups in seven characters. Correlation analysis showed that days to flowering (DTF) and days to maturity (DTM) had close association with agronomic traits as well as yield and yield components. Both DTF and DTM had positive correlation with the other characters except one hundred seed weight. Stepwise multiple linear regression revealed that seed and pod number were identified as being significant for plant yield. The results in this study indicated wide variation in agronomic traits including DTF and DTM, suggesting the valuable genetic resources in a soybean breeding program.
Keywords
soybean; genetic diversity; days to flowering; days to maturity; yield components;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Brown-Guedira, G. L., J. A. Thompson, R. L. Nelson, and M. L. Warburton. 2000. Evaluation of genetic diversity of soybean introductions and North American ancestors using RAPD and SSR markers. Crop Sci. 40: 815-823   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Burton, J. W. 1987. Chapter 6: Quantitative genetics: Results relevant to soybean. In Soybeans: improvement, production, and uses. 2nd Edition. pp. 221-227
3 Hudcovicova, M. and J. Kraic. 2003. Utilisation of SSRs for characterisation of the soybean genetic resources. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 39 : 120-126
4 Johnson, H. W., H. F. Robinson, and R. E. Comstock. 1955b. Genotypic and phenotypic correlations in soybeans and their implications in selection. Agron. J. 47: 477-483   DOI
5 Kim, Y. W. and J. H. Cho. 2005. Growth and yields of Korean soy­bean cultivars in drained-paddy field. Korean J. Crop Sci. 50 : 161-169   과학기술학회마을
6 Lee, S. H, M. A. Bailey, M. A. R. Mian, T. E. Carter, Jr. D. A. Ashley, R. S. Hussey, W. A. Parrott, and H. R. Boerma. 1996. Molecular markers associated with soybean plant height, lodging, and maturity across locations. Crop Sci. 36 : 728-735   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Malhotra, R. S., K. B. Singh, and H. S. Dhaliwal. 1972. Correla­tion and path-coefficient analyses in soybean. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 42 : 24-29
8 Smith, K. J. and W. Huyser. 1987. World distribution and signifi­cance of soybean in J.R. Wilcox (ed) Soybeans: Improvement and Uses. Agronomy 16: 1-22
9 Shukla, G. K. and D. P. Singh. 1967. Studies on heritability, corre­lation and discriminant function selection in jute. Indian J. Genet. 27 : 220-225
10 Johnson, H. W., H. F. Robinson, and R. E. Comstock. 1955a. Esti­mates of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agron. J. 47: 314-318   DOI
11 Yang, Q. and J. Wang. 2000. Agronomic traits correlation analysis between interspecific and intraspecific soybean crosses. http://www.soygenetics.org/articles/sgn2000-003.htm
12 SAS. 2000. SAS user's guide; Basics, Statistical Analysis System Institute. Cary, North Carolina, USA
13 Egli, D. B., J. E. Leggett, and J. M. Wood. 1978. Influence of soy­bean seed size and position on the rate and duration of filling. Agron. J. 70 : 127-130   DOI
14 Truong, N. T., J. G. Gwag, Y. J. Park, and S. H. Lee. 2005. Genetic diversity of soybean pod shape based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. Korean J. Crop Sci. 50 : 60-66   과학기술학회마을
15 Baranek, M., M. Kadlec, J. Raddova, M. Vachun, and M. Pidra. 2002. Evaluation of genetic diversity in 19 Glycine max (L.) Merr. accessions including in the Czech National Collection of soybean genotypes. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 38 : 69-74
16 Board, J. E. and B. G. Harville. 1993. Soybean yield component responses to a light interception gradient during the reproduc­tive period. Crop Sci. 33 : 772-777   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Cho, J. W., J. J. Lee, Y. J. Oh, J. D. Lee, and S. B. Lee. 2004. Effects of planting densities and maturing types on growth and yield of soybean in paddy field. Korean J. Crop Sci. 49 : 105-­109
18 Sharia, S. K. 1980. Note on the variability and correlation. J. Agric. Sci. 50(1): 87-89
19 Whigham, D. K. 1983. Soybean. Potential productivity of field crops under different environments. In: S. Yoshida, ed. IRRI, Philippines. p. 205-226
20 Shuping, C. 1994. Evaluation soybean cultivars from South of China in Thailand. ARC Training's report. pp. 1-6
21 Morrison, M. J., H. D. Voldeng, and E. R. Cober. 2000. Agro­nomic changes from 58 years of genetic improvement of short­season soybean cultivars in Canada. Agron. J. 92 : 780-784   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Pineiro, M. and G. Coupland. 1998. The control of flowering time and floral Identity in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 117 : 1-8   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Board, J. E., M. Kamal, and B. G. Harville. 1992. Temporal impor­tance of greater light interception to increased yield in narrow­row soybean. Agron. J. 84 : 575-579   DOI
24 Shanmugasundaram, S. 1981. Varietal differences and genetic behavior for the photoperiodic responses in soybean. Bull. Inst. Trop. Agr. Kyushu University. 4: 1-61
25 Summerfield, R. J. and E. H. Robert. 1985. A handbook of flower­ing. In: Soybean A.H. Halevy, ed. CRC Press. Boca Ration, Florida. p. 100-117
26 Board, J. E., B. G. Harville, and A. M. Saxton. 1990. Branch dry weight in relation to yield increases in narrow-row soybean. Agron. J. 82 : 540-544   DOI
27 Board, J. E. and Q. Tan. 1995. Assimilatory capacity effects on soybean yield components and on pod number. Crop Sci. 35 : 846-851   DOI   ScienceOn