Browse > Article

Flowering and Fruiting of Characteristics of Short Flowering Period Lines in Peanut  

Jeom-Ho Ryu (호남농업시험장)
Publication Information
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE / v.47, no.6, 2002 , pp. 437-442 More about this Journal
Abstract
To breed high quality and yield peanut variety according to select the short flowering duration, fifteen germplasms (1 virginia,7 spanish,6 valencia types and var, Daekwang) were investigated the flowering habit and agronomic characteristics from 1998 to 1999. Emergence date of the selected short flowering duration germplasms (SPFGs) was earlier 1-3 days and middle or small seed than that of var, Daekwang. Main stem length was longer 57cm but the number of branches, pods, 100-seed weight, and pod weight per plant was reduced 25%, 23%, 42%, 46%, respectively, in SPFCs comparing to var, Daekwang. The flowering date in SPFGs was similar but the flowering duration was earlier 5-16 days than that of var, Daekwang (52 days). Varieties that flowered shorter duration than 50 days were 18.8% among the SPFGs. The number of total flowers in SPFGs was fewer 50% than that of var, Daekwang. The rate of flowering inhibition were 50-52% than that of var Daekwang. The frequencies of flowering duration (under 50 days) were 7.7% in virginia, 46.2% in spanish, 53.9% in valencia. The effect of shading treatment on rate of flowering inhibition were 11%, but number of branches and pods were reduced by 27-31% in valencia type compared to non-shade. Correlation coefficient was significant positively ($r=0.9314^*$ virginia, $r=0.9551^*$ spanish, $r=0.9551^*$ valencia) between the air temperature and flower number, The frequency of peg and pod number on 1st to 2nd nodes in SPFGs were more 3-12%, 21-26% than that of var. Daekwang. The rate of mature pods at 80 days after flowering were higher 12-17% than that of var, Daekwang (68%). Correlation coefficient was high significant negatively between date of first flower and flowering date, the ratio of mature pod.
Keywords
Peanut; Flowering habit; Botanical type; Short flowering duration; Shade;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ablett, G. R. 1978. Temperature related effects on peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Production in a short-season environment, paper I. Screening of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm for yield and chilling tolerance. MSc. thesis. The Univ. of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. pp. 42
2 Branch, W. D. 1967. Screening for genetic tolerance to cold tempera-ture during germination in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). Ph. D. thesis, Oklahoma State Univ. p. 80
3 Emery. D. A., M. E. Sherman, and J. W. Vickers. 1981. The reproduc- tive efficiency ofcultivated peanuts. IV. The influency ofphotope-riod on the flowering, Pegging, and fruiting of spanish typepeanuts. Agronomy J. 70 : 619-623
4 Oh, Y. S. and Y. K. Cheong. 1997. Effect of C-MH on yield and pure seed ratio in peanut. Korean J. Crop Sci. 42(5) : 609-614
5 小林寶. 1952. 落花生の碑葉內生於け る子實發育諦草長. 日昨紀 21(l):43-44
6 竹內重之, 龜倉壽. 1964. 落花生の葉實發育 品種間について 千葉農試驗報告 第 15號
7 小野良孝, 尾埼蒸. 1971. 生育初期の遮光處理が薄花生の生育收量におよほす氣溫. 日昨期 40:480-484
8 Pattee, H. E. and C. T. Young. 1982. Peanut science technology. American Peanut and Education Society, Inc. Yoakmun, Texas 77995. USA
9 Summerfield R. J and E. H. Roberts. 1988. Arachis hypogaea. hand-book offlowehng. vol.(l) pp 74-83
10 小野良孝,尾埼蒸, 中山兼德. 1974. 落流生の開花におよほす氣溫の影響. 日昨紀 43: 237-241
11 Wynne, J. C., D. A. Amery, and R. J. Downs. 1973. Photoperiodic responses of peanuts. Crop sci. 13 : 511-514   DOI
12 前田和美, 1968. 落花生品種狀における開花所要および日數 間情花時期 か主童葉敵 の變異と桐關 について. 熱滯豊業 12:9-16. 時期
13 Krapovickas, A. 1969. The origin, variability and spread of the groundnut (Arachis hypogaea), Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago. pp. 427-441
14 Cox, R. R. 1978. Effect of quantity of light on the early growth and development ofthe peanut. Peanut Sci. 5 : 27-30   DOI
15 Shear, G. M. and L. I. Miller. 1955. Factors affecting fruit develop- ment of the jumbo runner peanut. Agron. J. 47 : 354-357   DOI
16 Bolhius, G. G. 1958. Observation on the flowering and fructification of the groundnut Arachis hypogaea L. II. Neth. J. Agric Sci. 6 : 245-248