Browse > Article

Effect of Harvesting Time and Additives on the Nutritive Values of Peanut Silage  

정영근 (호남농업시험장)
최윤희 (호남농업시험장)
박기훈 (호남농업시험장)
오윤섭 (호남농업시험장)
김원호 (축산기술연구소)
박문수 (호남농업시험장)
김순철 (호남농업시험장)
Publication Information
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE / v.47, no.3, 2002 , pp. 147-150 More about this Journal
Abstract
To investigate the effects of Harvesting time and additives on the quality of peanut silage, the silage was mixed in combination with peanut leaf and stem, rice and barley straw, inoculant etc. Harvesting time at peanut growth stage was the best at 90 days after flowering with 30 branches,81 g of 100-seed weight, and 77% of shelling rate with low diseases in leaf and stem. By delay of harvest, diseases and lodging were increased. The yield of forage was the highest at 90 days after flowering as 52 t/ha, and seed yield was at 110 days as 3.72 t/ha. The yields between forage yield and seed yield ($r^2$=0.62$^{**}$) were correlated positively. The value of silage as a forage came over 90 days after flowering in combination with peanut leaf+stem+vice straw+inoculant treatment. The treatment was increased dry matter (DM) yield and neutral detergent fiber (NDF), the coarse protein (CP), and total digestible nutrient (TDN) content of silage in comparing with control (peanut leaf+stem). The pH at the organic matter contents of silage in combination of peanut leaf+stem+rice straw+lactic acid treatment was 5.04 to 5.10, the content of butyric and lactic acid were 3.12 to 4.64%, 2.07 to 7.34%, respectively.y.
Keywords
peanut; harvested time; silage; nutritive value; organic acid; yield;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Larbi A, D. D. Dung, P E Olonmju, and J. W. Smith. 1999. Groundnut for food and fodder in crop-livestock system: Forage and seed yields, chemical composition and rumen degradation of leaf and stem fractions of 38 cultivars. Animal Feed Sci. and Tech. 77:33-47   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Powell, M. 1985. Contribution of fractionated crop residues to dry Sea-son livestock feed resources in the Abetplains. Central Nieeria. ILCA Newsletter 4:5-7
3 Gorden, F. J. 1989. An evaluation through lactating cattle of a bacterial inoculant as an additive for grass silage. Grass Forage Sci. 44:169-179   DOI
4 A. O. A. C. 1991. Official method of analysis. Washigton D. C
5 박근제. 2000. 조사료 수입에 대비한 자급사료 확보방안. 한국초지학회 제 38회 학술발표회 및 특별강연 초록. 57-93
6 ICRISAT (International Crop Research Institute for Semi-Arid Trop-ics) Sahelian Center, 1991. ICRISAT West African Programs Annual Report 1990, PP, 21-39
7 Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agr. Handbook 379, U. S. Gov. print, Office, Washigton, D. C
8 VearasilP, T., N. Potikanond, and P. Racha APai, 1981. Utilizaion of peanut stems and leaves as feed for ruminants: digestibility of fresh, dried and ensiled peanut stems and leaves in sheep. Thai J. Vet. Med. 3 : 208
9 Lindgren, S., A. Bromander and K. Petterson. 1988. Evalution of silage additives using scale model silos. Swedish Joumal Of Agri-cultural Research. 18:41-49