Browse > Article

Current Status and Prospect of Qauality Evaluation in Maize  

김선림 (농촌진흥청 작물시험장)
문현귀 (농촌진흥청 작물시험장)
류용환 (농촌진흥청 작물시험장)
Publication Information
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE / v.47, no., 2002 , pp. 107-123 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper is intented to present a information of various aspects of quality related characteristics and standards for grades in maize. Maize is world's one of the three most popular cereal crops and a primary energy supplement and can contribute up to 30, 60, and 98% of the dairy diet's protein, net energy, and starch, respectively. Maize is also processed into industrial goods by wet or dry milling. Sweet corn is a leader among vegetable crops and its production for fresh or processing markets is a major industry in many countries. Over the years, the combined efforts of breeders and geneticists, biochemists, food scientists, and others have helped bring us to the point where we understand issues related to sweet corn quality. Traditional criteria for selecting corn hybrids have been based primarily on agronomic factors, including grain production, disease resistance, drought tolerance, and storage characteristics. Little emphasis has been placed on the quality and nutritional values of corn. Although there is widespread interest for value-enhanced corns have increased tremendously in the last five years, there is limited information available on the production and comparing the quality attributes of specialty grains with those of normal yellow dent corn. Most countries have developed national maize standards, aiming to provide a framework for trade, both internal and external. Where trading involves direct choice and price negotiation in front of the commodity, grading standards are rarely employed; quality is assessed visually and is influenced by end-use, and the price is determined more by local rather than national factors. The use of an agreed standard will provide an unambiguous description of the quality of the consignment and assist in the formation of a legally-binding contract. Standards can also be seen to protect consumers rights through setting limits to the amount of unsuitable or noxious material.
Keywords
maize; quality evaluation; sweet corn; value enhanced corn.;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 USAD, 1997a. United states standards for grades of sweet corn. Effec-tive February 12, 1992 (Reprinted-January 1997)
2 Intemational Food Biotechnology Council and Intemational Life Sci-ences Institute - Allergy and Immunology Institute. 1996. Allerge-nicity of foods produced by genetic modification, Critical Reviewsin Food Science and Nutrition, Supplement to vol. 36., CRC Press,Florida, USA
3 Boland M., M. Domine, K. Dhuyvetter and T. Herrnan. 1999. Eco-nomic issues with value-enhanced com. Kansas State UniversityAgricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Ser-vice. 13p
4 Flora, L. F. and R. C. Wiley. 1974. Sweet corn aroma, chemical com-ponents and relative importance in the overall flavour response. J.Food Sci. 39 : 770-773   DOI
5 Grades and grade requirements. www.kswheat.com/international/exports/Grades.htm
6 Johnson, D. L. and R. L. Croissant. 1990. Altemate crop productionand marketing in Colorado. Colorado Expt. Sta. Coop. Ext. Serv.and Dept. of Agron. Tech. Bul. LBT90-3
7 Kim, S. L., B. H. Choi, S. U. Park and H. G. Moon. 1996. Functionalingredients and their variation. Korean J. Crop Sci. 41(S) : 46-68
8 김영미, 김태산, 박용환. 2001. GMO 검정기술의 연구개발 동향.Korean J. Crop Sci. 46(S1) : 24-29
9 Simmone, E., A. Simmone and R. Boozer. 1999. Yield, ear Character-istics, and consumer acceptance of selected white sweet corn Vari-eties in the southeastem united states. HotrTechnol. 9(2) : 289-293
10 Tracy, W. F. 2001. Sweet corn. In: SpeciaUty corns, 2nd Edition, A.R.Hallauer, ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton. pp155-170
11 USDA. 1997. Grain inspection handbook. Book II. Corn. Chapter4 :pp.1-22
12 USAD, 1999. United states standards for grades of canned whole ker-ne1(who1e grain) corn. Effective December 8, 1999
13 U.S. Grains Council. 1998-1999a. Introduction to world feed grainmarkets and the role of value-enhanced grains. U.S. Grains Coun-cil VEG Merchandiser Manual. Chapter 1. pp. 142
14 Wong, A. D., J. A. Juvik, D. C. Breeden and J. M. Swiader. 1994 Shnmken2 sweet com yield and the chemical components of qual-ity. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sco. 199(4) : 747-755
15 Vasal, S. K. 1999. Quality protein maize story. Improving humannutrition through agriculture: the role of intemational agriculturalresearch. October 5-7. CIMMYT: 1-16
16 Beek, S. D. and R. G. Dado. 1998. Nutritional value of high lysinecorn or regular corn as grain or corn silage for lactating cows. J.Dairy Sci. 71 : 1202. (Abstr.)
17 Boncheff, B. Sweet corn grading and packing manual. Ministry ofAgriculture and Food Contact. www.gov.on.ca/OMAFRA/english/food/inspection/fruitveg/manuals/sweetcorn.htm
18 Jackson, D. S. 1992. Corn quality for industrial uses. Fietd Crops.www.ianr.unl.edu/pubs/fieldcrops/gl115.htm
19 Johnson, D. L. and M. N. Jha. 1993. Blue corn. In: J. Janick and J.E.Simon (eds.), New crops. Wiley, New York. p228-230
20 U.S. Grains Council. 1998-1999b. Specifying and testing qualityattributes in value-enhanced corn(VEC). U.S. Grains CounciVEG Merchandiser Manual. Chapter 6. pp. 127148
21 Azanza, F., A. Bar-Zur and J. A. Juvik. 1996. Variation in sweet cornkernel characteristics associated with stand establishment and eat-ing quality. Euphytica. 87 : 7-18   DOI
22 USAD, 1997b. United states standards for grades of sweet corn forprocessing. Effective May 15, 1962 (Reprinted-January 1997)
23 U.S. Feed Grains Council, 1996-1997. Value-Enhanced Corn QualityReport
24 Park, K. Y., B. H. Choi, S. K. Jong, S. S. Lee and S. U. Park. 1988.Current status of quality improvement in maize. Korean J. Crop Sci. (Sl): 49-63
25 Keeneth, Terry L. Southwest Indiana Food Corn Production and Resource Guide
26 Araba, M. 1997. Value-added identity preserved ingredients: impact ofnew grain varieties on feed manufacturing. Feed manage. 48 : 11-15
27 Lowe, J. Grading corn. www. ontariocorn.org/gradingc.html
28 Evans, M. G., R. L. Nielsen and C. B. Southard. USDA grading stan-dards and moisture conversion table for corn. Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service. www.agcom.purdue.edu/AgCom/Pubs/AY/AY-225.pdf
29 Maier, D. E. 1999. Grain quality issues related to genetically modifiedcrops. www.agcom.purdue.edu/AgCom/Pubs/GQ/GQ-42/GQ-42.html
30 Andrew, S. M., J. H. Clark and C. L. Davis. 1979. Feeding value ofopaque-2 corn grain and corn silage for lactating dairy cows. J.Dairy Sci. 62: 1619-1625   DOI
31 Semple, R. L. and G. I. Kirenga. 2001. Developing standardizedgrades and quality standards for the regional trade of maize in east-ern and southem Africa. In: Facilitating regional trade of agricul-tural commodities in Eastern, Central and Southem Africa.www.fao.org/inpho/v1ibrary/new_fao/x5417e/x5417e0q.htm
32 Bjarnason, M. and S. K. Vasal. 1992. Breeding of quality proteinmaize(QPM), in Plant Breeding Rev., Janick, J., Ed., 1992, p181
33 박선희. 2001. 유전자재조합 농산물의 식품 안전성. Korean J.Crop Sci. 46(S1) : 24-29
34 Ricard, G. D. 1999. Nuthtional benefits of speciality corn grain hybrids in dairy diets. J. Anim. Sci. 77(2) : 197-206   DOI
35 Thomison, P. R., A. B. Geyer, T. Dobbels and H. Sieghst. 2001. Grainquality attributes of TopCross high oil, high lysine, waxy, and Con-ventional yellow dent corns. Horticutture and Crop Science.www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/hocom/agfl37no.ht
36 Lauer, J. 1998. Management need for specialty corn hybrids. FileldCrops. 28 : 31-37