Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2021.11.07.253

A Study on the Differences in Class Satisfaction of Students Majoring in Beauty by Teaching Methods of Theory and Practice Subjects before and after COVID-19  

Kim, Jong-Ran (Dept. of Beauty.Cosmetic, Osan University)
Publication Information
Journal of Convergence for Information Technology / v.11, no.7, 2021 , pp. 253-263 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims to present effective teaching and learning methods for improving class satisfaction and improving the quality of university education by empirically analyzing changes in class satisfaction according to teaching methods such as face-to-face(FTF) classes, non-face-to-face(NFTF) classes, and blended classes of theories and practical subjects before and after COVID-19, targeting beauty major students who have a relatively higher proportion of practical classes than theoretical classes. For data analysis, SPSS 18.0 statistical package was used, and in the analysis of the difference in satisfaction with teaching methods for theoretical subjects before and after COVID-19, 10 items out of 20 items showed statistically significant differences, and 8 items out of 20 items in the practical subjects showed statistically significant differences. It is expected that the quality of university education will be improved by applying efficient and practical teaching methods considering the items affecting the class satisfaction according to the teaching and learning methods of these theories and practical subjects.
Keywords
COVID-19; FTF Classes; NFTF Classes; Blended Classes; Teaching Method; Class Satisfaction;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 J. H. Son & H. S. Kim. (2020). A Survey Study on Face-to-face & Non-face-to-face Classes for Students Majoring in Radiology. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology, 43(6), 511-518. DOI : 10.17946/JRST.2020.43.6.511   DOI
2 K. H. Kim. (2020). Study on the Effects and Limitations of Blended Learning-based College Lectures in Online Courses. Korean Journal of General Education, 14(5), 239-249.   DOI
3 M. Discoll, (2002). Blended Learning, e-learning, 3(3), 54-56.
4 J. S. Park. (2015). Mediating Effect of Acceptance in Relationship between University Life Stress and Satisfaction with Life. The Korean Journal Of Stress Research, 23(1), 1-8. DOI : 10.17547/kjsr.2015.23.1.1   DOI
5 Y. M. Baek. (2017). The Moderating Effects of Flow on the Relationship between Stress and Satisfaction with life, University life Satisfaction. Korea Academy Industrial Cooperation Society, 18(5), 490-496. DOI : 10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.5.490   DOI
6 E. G. Yoon. (2018). A Study on the Variables Affecting the Evaluation of Lectures : Focusing on Liberal Arts Education. Korean Journal of General Education, 12(5), 185-210.
7 N. I. kim. (2020). A Study on the Satisfaction of Non-face-to-face Online Class -Focused on K University. Asia Culture Academy of Incorporated Association, 11(5), 1145-1158. DOI : 10.22143/HSS21.11.5.8   DOI
8 N. Emelyanova & E. Voronina. (2014). Introducing a learning management system at a Russian university: Students' and teachers' perceptions. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 272-289.
9 J. S. Choi & M. K. Kwon & E. K. Choi. (2020). A Study on Learner Perceptions and Satisfaction Levels of Real-Time Online Learning. Journal of the International Network for Korean Language and Culture. 17(2), 247-277. DOI : 10.15652/ink.2020.17.2.247.   DOI
10 S. C. Lee, S. Y. Kim & S. H. Park. (2020). An early assessment on Korean universities' response to COVID-19: A case of KNU's untact class evaluation. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(20), 993-1019.   DOI
11 S. Y. Park. (2020). A Study on the Efficient Design Education Program through Non-face-to-face Online Practical Classes. Master's Thesis. Pukyong National University, Busan.
12 B. Y. Kim & S. W. Han, (2020). A Study on Satisfaction with Involuntary University Online Lecture by Corona 19. The Journal of General Education, 13, 7-31.   DOI
13 C. J. Song. (2014). A Study on the Teaching and Learning Activities, Student-teacher Communication, and Course Satisfaction. Asian Journal of Education, 15(2), URI : 171-200. https://hdl.handle.net/10371/92560   DOI
14 D. J. Lee & M. S. Kim. (2020). University students' perceptions on the practices of online learning in the COVID-19 situation and future directions. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 359-377. DOI : 10.15702/mall.2020.23.3.359   DOI
15 Wikipedia. (n.d.). Curriculum(Online).https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EA%B5%90%EC%9C%A1%EA%B3%BC%EC%A0%95
16 S. J. Mok. (2015). A study on the operation of convergence-based English subjects using flipped learning methodology - centered around screen English, SNS English and TED English. Korean Journal of General Education, 9(3), 193-214.
17 S. Y. Song & H. K. Kim. (2020). Exploring Factors Influencing College Students' Satisfaction and Persistent Intention to Take Non Face-to-Face Courses during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Asian Journal of Education, 21(4), 1099-1126. DOI : 10.15753/aje.2020.12.21.4.1099   DOI
18 UNESCO. (2020). Policy Brief: Education during COVID-19 and Beyond. United Nations.
19 J. H. Shin. (2020). The Meaning and Tasks of Education left by COVID-19. SNUNOW(165)(Online). https://youtube.com/c/kaosscience
20 Y. R. Chung. (2009). A Study of the Effect Factors' Influence on Course Satisfaction in Cyber University. Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 61-94.   DOI
21 MOHW. (n. d). COVID-19.(Online). http://ncov.mohw.go.kr/
22 T. H. Kim & W. M. Kim. (2005). A Study on the Learning Model for Efficient Culinary Practice. Culinary Science & Hospitality Research 11(1), 1-17.
23 H. J. Jeon & H. S. Kang. (2014). In Search of the Limitations of Schwab's practical curriculum and Its Possibility of Narrative as alternative. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(3), 169-191.
24 S. W. Kim & M. S. Lee. (2018). A Study on e-Learning environment and contents in higher education. Journal of Korea Society of Digital Industry and Information Management, 14(3), 103-113. DOI : 10.17662/ksdim.2018.14.3.103.   DOI