Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2021.11.03.229

A Study on the Development of Artificial Intelligence in a Liberal Arts Applying SSI  

Lee, KyungHee (Dept. of Innovation and Convergence, Hoseo University)
Publication Information
Journal of Convergence for Information Technology / v.11, no.3, 2021 , pp. 229-235 More about this Journal
Abstract
Artificial intelligence technology is influencing across all areas as technology advances and social needs change. Therefore, Korean universities have actively developed and operated classes related to artificial intelligence, and have emphasized the importance of artificial intelligence not only in major education but also in liberal arts education. However, there is a lack of research on the development of educational methods and educational programs because artificial intelligence education in liberal arts is in its early stages. SSI is an education that can apply social and ethical problems related to science to open problems that can creatively and reasonably present solutions. SSI can be applied to make AI education more effective. In this study, an artificial intelligence liberal arts curriculum applied SSI was developed with three purposes: First, it is designed is designed so that students subject to education can access it by considering its characteristics as actors of the intelligent information society. Second, it is designed so that students can experience artificial intelligence programs themselves and deal with science technology and social relevance in depth, focusing on various examples of real life. Third, it is designed and approached so that students can participate and cooperate for the purpose of solving common problems to develop cooperative problem-solving skills.
Keywords
AI Education; Liberal Arts; SSI:Socio-Scientific Issues; University Student; Instructional Design;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Y. M. Kim. (2019). Artificial Intelligence(AI) Manpower Nurturing Policies and Implications by Major Country. Khidi Brief 276, Korea Health Industry Development Institute.
2 S. C. Ur & I. H. Kim. (2018). Study on the Development of Liberal Arts and the Needs of Other Liberal Arts Subjects in response to the Fourth Industrial Revolution - A Paradigm on the Education of Universities for Humanities to Meet the AI Era. University of Transportation Policy Research Report.
3 C. S. Lee. (2008). Development of Technology Attitude Scale for Korea Pupils. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 14(2), 157-174. DOI : 10.17055/jpaer.2008.14.2.157   DOI
4 M. Y. Ryu & S. K. Han. (2018). The Educational Perception on Artificial Intelligence by Elementary School Teachers. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 22(3), 317-324. DOI : 10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.3.317   DOI
5 Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377.   DOI
6 Ministry of Science and ICT. (2019). Beyond IT World Power to AI Powerful Nation.
7 Chinese Artificial Intelligence Textbook. (2020). Artificial Intelligence Experimental Textbook - Part I. (Online). https://item.jd.com/12461281.html
8 KOFAC. (2019). Development a Standard Curriculum Model of Next-generation Software Education. Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement Science Creativity.
9 E. S. Jang. (2020). A Case Study on the Operation of Artificial I ntelligence in a Liberal Arts Mandatory Curriculum. The Korean Association of General Education, 14(5), 137-148. DOI : 10.46392/kjge.2020.14.5.137   DOI
10 Baejae University. (Online). AI․SW Universities. (Online). https://sw.pcu.ac.kr/sub02/sub0201.html
11 http://www.bu.ac.kr/web/index.do
12 Soonchunhyang University. (n.d.). liberal arts course. (Online). https://nanum.sch.ac.kr/0204.php
13 J. S. Park. (2020). Need AI education" ...97.9% answered. Etnews. (Online). https://www.etnews.com/20200310000244
14 Ministry of Education. (2019). 2019 OECD Education Indicators. Economic Cooperation and Development(OECD).
15 https://github.com/touretzkyds/ai4k12/wiki
16 https://elementsofai.com
17 C. Bailey. (1975). Neutrality and rationality in teaching. In Bridges, D. and Scrimshaw, P. (Eds.). Values and authority in school. London: Hodder and stoughton.
18 P. J. Fensham. (2002). Time to change drivers for scientific literacy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(1), 9-24.   DOI
19 J. M. Reiss. (2009). Teaching ethics in science. Studies in Science Education, 34, 115-140.   DOI
20 E. Pedretti. (1999). Decision making and STS education: Exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centers through and issue-based approach. School Science & Mathematics, 99(4), 174-181.   DOI
21 C. H. Lawshe. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563-575. DOI : 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x   DOI
22 D. L. Zeidler, T. D. Sadler, M. L. Simmons & E. V. Howes. (2005). Beyond STS: A Research-based Framework for Socioscientific Issues Education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377.   DOI
23 P. Nuangchalerm. (2009). Development of socioscientific issues-based teaching for preservice science teachers. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 239-243.   DOI
24 H. J. Song. (2016). Study on Developing Inventory of Students Satisfaction in University. The Journal of the Korea Contents Associatio,. 16(8), 556-567. DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.08.556   DOI
25 J. S. Lee. (2001). Delphi Method. Seoul: Education Science Co.