Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2021.11.03.020

The Improvement Plan for Personal Information Protection for Artificial Intelligence(AI) Service in South Korea  

Shin, Young-Jin (Division of Intelligent SW Engineering-Information Security, PaiChai University)
Publication Information
Journal of Convergence for Information Technology / v.11, no.3, 2021 , pp. 20-33 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is to suggest improvements of personal information protection in South Korea, according to requiring the safety of process and protection of personal information. Accordingly, based on data collection and analysis through literature research, this study derived the issues and suitable standards of personal information for major artificial intelligence services. In addition, this cases studies were reviewed, focusing on the legal compliance and porcessing compliance for personal information proection in major countries. And it suggested the improvement plan applied in South Korea. As the results, in legal compliance, it is required reorganization of related laws, responsibility and compliance to develop and provide AI, and operation of risk management for personal information protection laws in AI services. In terms of processing compliance, first, in pre-processing and refining, it is necessary to standardize data set reference models, control data set quality, and voluntarily label AI applications. Second, in development and utilization of algorithm, it is need to establish and apply a clear regulation of the algorithm. As such, South Korea should apply suitable improvement tasks for personal information protection of safe AI service.
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence(AI) service; Personal Information Protection; Legal Compliance; Processing Process; Risk Management; Protection Measures;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Y. J. Shin. (2020). A Study on Improvement Measures to Implement Safe and Intelligent Government: Focusing on Prevention of Dysfunction and Privacy by Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology. Korea Criminal Intelligence Review. 6(2), 135-162. DOI : 10.33563/KSCIA.2020.6.2.8   DOI
2 J. M. Yang. (2020). Some legal considerations of the AI chatbot algorithm. Hongik law review. 21(1), 449. DOI : 10.16960/jhlr.21.1.202002.449   DOI
3 Future of life. (2019. 3. 19). AI Policy-United Stateds. (Online). https://futureoflife.org/ai-policy-united-states/
4 The White House. (2020. 2). Remove Barriers to AI Innovation. American Artificial Intelligence Initiative: Year One Annual Report.
5 Council of Europe. (2018). European ethical Charter on the use of Artificial Intelligence in judicial systems and their environment. 7-12.
6 Law Council of Australlia. (2019. 6. 28). Artificial Intelligence: Australia's Ethics Framework, 13-28.
7 White & case. (2020. 8. 24). Regulation of Artificial Inteligence in Europe and Japan. (Online). https://www.whitecase.com/publications/insight/regulation-artificial-intelligence-europe-and-japan
8 China innovation funding. (2020. 6. 17). Publication of the "New Generation AI Governance Principles-Developing Responsible AI". China innovation funding. (Oinline). http://chinainnovationfunding.eu/dt_testimonials/publication-of-the-new-generation-ai-governance-principles-developing-responsible-ai/
9 OECD Legal Instruments. (n. d.) Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. (Oinline). https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449
10 Australian Government(Department of Industry, Sciences, Energy and Resources). (2019). Artificial Intelligence: Australia's Ethics Framework, A Disscussion Paper. Canberra: Department of Industry, Sciences, Energy and Resources.
11 European Commission. (2020. 2. 19). White Paper On Artificial Intelligence - A European approach to excellence and trust.
12 G. B. Song & J. H. Cho. (2020). Implications of AI(Artificial Intelligence) Policy in Korea Police Agency - Focusing on the Policy in France. The Police Science Journal. 15(1), 247-266.   DOI
13 Code Dragon. (n. d.) Data Achitecure Reference Model. Diagram (Online). https://codedragon.tistory.com/8965
14 DRAAGON1. (2016. 8. 29). Data Achitecure Reference Model. (Online). http:://bit.ly./2IuH8Hs
15 Korea Communications Commission & Korea Internet & Security Agency. (2020) European Union General Data Protection Regulation.: 28-75.
16 J. M. Shin. (2018. 11. 25). From case law analysis to legal counseling.. Is the age of AI lawyers open? Hankyoreh News. (Online). http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/PRINT/871629.html
17 K. A. Ahn. (2020. 7). The 21st National Assembly's biggest homework is'Creating software, digital legal system and ecosystem suitable for the era of AI and untact, Monthly Software Oriented Society. 73, 26-35.
18 A. Cavoukian. (2011). Privacy by Design, The 7 Foundational Principal. Ontario: Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. (Online). http://privacybydesign.ca
19 Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy.Korea Industrial Development Institute. (2019). Japan's Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy Trends. Sejong: MOTIE & KID.
20 Ministry of Science and ICT. (2018). Artificial intelligence (AI) R&D strategy for realizing I-Korea 4.0. Sejong: MSIT.
21 J. H. Kim et al. (2016). A Study on Personal Information Protection in Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. Seoul: Personal Information Protection Committee.
22 D. S. Choi (2016). Artificial intelligence and fintech security. Review of KIISC. 26(2), 35-38.
23 Y. J. Shin. (2020). A Study on Personal Information Protection Tasks of Artificial Intelligence Service. Winter academic conference proceedings of Korean Association For Public Administration in 2020. Seoul: KAPA.
24 S. M. Yoo. (2018. 9. 28). AI used for security, useful for hacking. The Science Times. (Online). https://m.post.naver.com/viewer/postView.nhn?volumeNo=16783071&memberNo=30120665&vType=VERTICAL
25 W. T. Lee. (2016). EU algorithm regulation issues and policy implications. KISDI Premium Report. Jincheon: KISDI.
26 legislationpp. (2018. 11. 29). Overseas discussions on AI privacy issues. legislationpp. (Online). http://blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blogId=legislationpp&logNo=221408527453
27 Y. D. Kim & W. C. Jang. (2016). Direction of Improvement of Privacy Protection Regulation for Promoting Artificial Intelligence Industry. Journal of Law & Economic Regulation. 9(2), 161-176.
28 W. T. Lee & J. M. Kang. (2016). A study on Model of Personal Information Protection based on Artificial Intelligence Technology or Service. The Journal of The Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication. 18(4), 1-6. DOI : 10.7236/JIIBC.2016.16.4.1   DOI
29 Korea Internet & Security Agency. (2020). Request for proposal, A study on improving personal information protection policy to foster the artificial intelligence industry.
30 J. OCallaghan. (2018). Inferential Privacy and Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Law & Economic Regulation. 11(2), 72-89.
31 K. S. Lim. (2019). The legal discipline of artificial intelligence : focusing on the legal discipline of artificial intelligence algorithm and big data. Doctoral dissertation. Hanyang University School of Law.
32 National Information Society Agency, (2017) Korea A.I. Company Status Report. Naju: KISA.
33 J. B. Park & H. H. Kim. (2017). Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Technology and its Legal Countermeasure. Hanyang Law Review. 34(2), 37-62.
34 F. H. Cate & R. Dockery. (2018. 11). (T. O. Kim, Trans.). Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection : Observations on a Growing Conflict. Journal of Law & Economic Regulation. 11(2), 131-146.