Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2020.10.11.340

Development of Comprehensive Professionalism Measurement Tools for Hospital Administration staffs  

Park, Ki-Hyeok (Department of Health Care Management, Catholic University of Pusan)
Jung, Yong-Mo (Department of Health Administration, Busan Digital University)
Publication Information
Journal of Convergence for Information Technology / v.10, no.11, 2020 , pp. 340-350 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to present comprehensive professionalism measurement tools suitable for hospital administration staffs. The study used measurement tools related to the psychological and behavioral characteristics of individuals used in prior studies for administration staffs at general hospitals and hospitals. Factor analysis and reliability analysis were conducted to verify the validity and internal relevance. As a result of the analysis, it was concluded that composed of 5 factors, and that the total reliability was 94.4%, which was very reasonable as a comprehensive professionalism measurement tool. Therefore, each component was defined as Confidence of Job performance, Salary Adequacy, Pride in Duties, Ability to achieve work goals, and Work Autonomy in order to provide a clear meaning. Professionalism from a modern perspective is a broader concept than traditional professionalism, including the subjective perceptions of job values and individuals' their abilities. Therefore, comprehensive professionalism measurement tools presented in this study will be very suitable and useful for hospital administration staffs.
Keywords
Hospital administration staff; Comprehensive Professionalism; Psychological and Attitude Attribute; Traditional Professionalism; Modern Professionalism;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 G. M. Hampton & D. L. Hampton. (2004). Relationship of professionalism, reward, market orientation and job satisfaction among medical professional: The case of certified nurse-midwives. Journal of Business Research, 57(9), 1042-1053. DOI : 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00356-9   DOI
2 M. L. Riggs & P. A. Knight. (1994). The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: a causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 755-766.   DOI
3 G. Chen, S. M. Gully & D. Eden. (2001). Validation of new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62-83. DOI : 10.1177/109442810141004   DOI
4 D. Bhugra & S. Gupta. (2010). Teaching and learning Professional values. Asia Pacific Psychiatry, 2(2), 65-67.   DOI
5 P. Jarvis. (1983). Professional education. Beckenham. kent : Croom Helm.
6 H. S. Oh. (2006). A Study on the Process of Expertise Development and Key Factors. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 9(2), 193-216.
7 J. Goode. William. (1960). Encroachment, chalantalism and the emerging Profession: psychiatry sociology and medicine. American Social Review, 25, 902-914.
8 E. Moore. Wilbert. (1970). The professions: Roles and rules. New York : Russel sage foundation.
9 E. Freidson. (2007). Professionalilsm. Paju, Gyeonggi : acanet
10 H. K. Jung. (2016). The effect of nurse's professionalism and job satisfaction on change jobs and career drop. Doctoral dissertation. Daegu Hanny University, Daegu.
11 S. M. Jex & T. W. Britt. (2008). Organizational Psychology: A Scientist-Practitioner Approach. Hboken, NJ : John Wiley & Sons.
12 C. H. Ryu. (2015). The Influence of Female Police Officers' Efficacy on Their Job Attitudes. The Korea Association of Police Science Review, 17(3), 143-176.
13 H. J. Yoo, T. Y. Yoo, T. I. Chung, S. H. Bae & A. R. Jo. (2014). Scale Development of Occupational Identity and Testing Model of Antecedents and outcome variables of Occupational Identity. The Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 27(4), 617-642. DOI : 10.24230/ksiop.27.4.201411.617   DOI
14 A. Bandura. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY : Freeman.
15 S. A. Reid & M. A. Hogg. (2005). Uncertainty reduction, self-enhancement, and ingroup identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(6), 804-817. DOI : 10.1177/0146167204271708   DOI
16 M. J. Kim. (2017). Structural Relationships between Professional Identity, Person-Job Fit, Self-Efficacy, Support for Career Development, and Job Challenge of HRD Practitioners in Korean Conglomerates. Doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul.
17 R. H. Hall. (1968). Professionalization and bureaucratization. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 92-104. DOI : 10.2307/2092242.   DOI
18 J. D. Lim. (2013). The Medical Professionalism and Organizational Performance of Medical Technician in Hospital. The Korea Contents Society, 13(12), 910-920. DOI : 10.5392/KCA.2013.13.12.910   DOI
19 R. L. Cruess, S. R. Cruess & S. E. Johnson. (2000). Professionalism: An ideal to be sustained. Lancet, 356(9224), 156-159. DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02458-2   DOI
20 Y. I. Kwon. (2011). A study of undergraduate students in a pre-service program for prospective lifelong educators on the general self-efficacy and specific self-efficacy. Journal of Lifelong Education, 17(1), 91-118.
21 K. A. Ericsson. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
22 Y. J. Choi. (2014). The hierarchical linear relationship among structured on-the-job training activities, individual level variables, and organizational level variables of workers in small and medium-sized enterprises. Doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul.
23 J. Haywood-Farmer & F. I. Stuart. (1990). An instrument to measure the degree of professionalism in a professional service. Service Industries Journal, 10(2), 336-347. DOI : 10.1080/02642069000000034   DOI
24 E. K. Bae, M. J. Dong & H. J. Lee. (2011). Critical Review of the Literature on Expertise Research: Outcomes, Limitations, and Implications for HRD. The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development, 13(1), 1-26.
25 D. Weis & M. J. Schank. (2009). Development and psychometric evaluation of the nurses professional values scale revised. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 17(3), 221-231.   DOI
26 T. Mancini, L. Caricati, C. Panari & A. Tonarelli. (2015). Personal and social aspects of professional identity: An extension of Marcia's identity status model applied to a sample of university students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 89, 140-150. DOI : 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.06.002   DOI
27 A. S. Hirschy, M. E. Wilson, D. L. Liddell, K. M. Boyle & K. Pasquesi. (2015). Socialization to student affairs: early career experiences associated with professional identity development. Journal of College Student Development, 56(8), 777-793. DOI : 10.1353/csd.2015.0087   DOI
28 J. H. Kim. (2011). The Causal Relationship among Professionalism, Market Orientation, and Job Attitudes of Human Resource Development Practitioners. Doctoral dissertation. Chung-Ang University, Seoul.
29 E. Freidson. (1970). Professional dominance: The social structure of medical care. Chicago, IL : Aldine.
30 J. Kultgen. (1988). Ethics & professionalism. Philadelphia. PA : University of Pennsylvania Press.
31 Y. H. Lee, S. G. Han, J. H. Chung & K. H. Kim. (2008). Work Values and Vocational Ethics of Korea: Work Ethics and Professionalism of professionals. Seoul : Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education & Training
32 M. Y. Kwon, H. K. Jung & D. Y. Han. (2006). A Study on How Service Quality of Family Restaurant Exert a Significant Influence Customer Satisfaction and Revisit Intention. Korea Association of Business Education, 44, 65-92.
33 G. S. Choi & J. Y. Kim. (2006). The Causal Relationship Among University Educational Service Orientation, Customer Satisfaction and Organizational Performance. Korea Association of Business Education, 41, 217-242
34 J. C. Kim & M. M. Moon. (2011). The Impact of organizational career management practice on organizational commitment - Focusing the mediating role of internalization and self-efficacy-. Journal of Tourism Management Research, 15(2), 1-18.
35 M. Sherer, J. E. Maddux, B. Mercandante, S. Prentice-dunn, B. Jacobs & R. W. Rogers. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Report, 51(2), 663-671. DOI : 10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663   DOI