1 |
H. Traunmuller & E. Anders. (1995). The frequency range of the voice fundamental in the speech of male and female adults. Unpublished Manuscript.
|
2 |
B. Inan. (2012). A comparison of classroom interaction patterns of native and non-native EFL teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2419-2423.
DOI
|
3 |
Y. Maryn & N. Roy. (2012). Sustained vowels and continuous speech in the auditory-perceptual evaluation of dysphonia severity. Journal de Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia, 24(2), 107-112.
DOI
|
4 |
P. Boersma & D. Weenink. (2013). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [windows 10]. Version 5.3.51, retrieved 3 June 2017 from http://www.praat.org/.
|
5 |
Z. Dornyei. (2010a). The relationship between language aptitude and language learning motivation: Individual differences from a dynamic systems perspective. In E. Macaro (Ed.) Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 247-267). London: Continuum.
|
6 |
Z. Dornyei & I. Otto. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working Papers In Applied Linguistics. 4, 43-69.
|
7 |
R. C. Gardner. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Arnold.
|
8 |
R. Bahous, N. N. Bacha & M Nabhani. (2011). Motivating Students in the EFL Classroom: A Case Study of Perspectives. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 33-43, 2011.
DOI
|
9 |
H. Gardner. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
|
10 |
A. Liuoliene & R. Metiuniene. (2006). Second language learning motivation. Santalka. Filologija Edulologija, 14(2), 93-98.
DOI
|
11 |
R. C. Gardner. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Arnold.
|
12 |
R. Clement. (1980). Ethnicity, contact, and communicative competence in a second language. In E. Giles, D. Robinson, & P.M. Smith (Eds.) Language: Social psychology perspectives (pp. 146-154). Oxford: Pergamon.
|
13 |
M. O. Akita. (2014). The Effectiveness of Interactive Teaching Methods in EFL Classrooms: A Comparison with Bottom-Up and Top-Down Methods. Applied Linguistics, 5, 2014.
|
14 |
T. Morell. (2004). Interactive lecture discourse for university EFL students. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 325 - 338. DOI : 10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00029-2.
DOI
|
15 |
B. Inan. (2012). A comparison of classroom interaction patterns of native and non-native EFL teachers. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2419-2423.
|
16 |
Wiberg, E. (2003). The interactional context of L2 dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics. 35(3), 389-407.
DOI
|
17 |
D. Graddol. (1986). Discourse specific pitch behaviour," in Intonation in Discourse. edited by Catherine Johns-Lewis (Croom Helm, London and Sidney), pp. 221-237.
|
18 |
B. Gorjian, H. Abdolmajid & P. Pourkhon. (2013). Using Praat software in teaching prosodic features to EFL learners. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 84, 34-40.
|
19 |
P. Medgyes. (1994). The non-native teacher. London: Macmillan.
|
20 |
C. Johns-Lewis. (1986). Prosodic differentiation of discourse modes in Intonation in Discourse. edited by Catherine Johns-Lewis (Croom Helm, London and Sidney), pp. 199-219.
|