Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2019.9.8.027

The Effects of Technostress from using Blockchain on the Technology Acceptance Model(TAM)  

Lee, Hang (Department of Global Economics, Gachon University)
Kim, Joon-Hwan (Department of Paideia, Sungkyul University)
Publication Information
Journal of Convergence for Information Technology / v.9, no.8, 2019 , pp. 27-34 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to empirically analyze the moderating effect of psychological empowerment on the relationship between technostress, the technology acceptance model, and the continuance intention of use. The results of the analyses are as follows: First, IT corporation workers' technostress had a negative effect on perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. Second, psychological empowerment was found to regulate the relationship between technostress and the technology acceptance model. Third, the perceived ease of use of IT corporation workers had a significant positive effect on the continuance intention of use, and the perceived usefulness had a positive effect on the continuance intention of use. These findings imply that training and education should be continuously conducted to improve psychological empowerment as well as manage technostress.
Keywords
Blockchain; Technostress; Technology Acceptance Model(TAM); Psychological Empowerment; IT Corporation Workers;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 K. W. Thomas & B. A. Velthouse. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An "interpretive" model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681.   DOI
2 J. A. Conger & R. N. Kanungo. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482.   DOI
3 J. H. You & C. Park. (2010). A Comprehensive Review of Technology Acceptance Model Researches. Entrue Journal of Information Technology, 9(2), 31-50.
4 R. Agarwal & J. Prasad. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204-215. DOI : 10.1287/isre.9.2.204   DOI
5 C. W. D. Chen & C. Y. J. Cheng. (2009). Understanding consumer intention in online shopping: a respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(4), 335-345. DOI : 10.1080/01449290701850111   DOI
6 G. M. Spreitzer. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465. DOI : 10.5465/256865   DOI
7 P. S. Ellen, W. O. Bearden & S. Sharma. (1991). Resistance to technological innovations: an examination of the role of self-efficacy and performance satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(4), 297-307. DOI : 10.1007/BF02726504   DOI
8 A. Alaiad & L. Zhou. (2014). The determinants of home healthcare robots adoption: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(11), 825-840. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.07.003   DOI
9 A. Bhattacherjee & N. Hikmet. (2007). Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(6), 725-737. DOI : 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000717   DOI
10 L. Hu & P. M. Bentler. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidiscipinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. DOI : 10.1080/10705519909540118   DOI
11 C. Fornell & D. F. Larcker. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. DOI : 10.1177/002224378101800104   DOI
12 H. J. Kim & J. Y. Rha. (2015). Is smartphone smart for everybody? A study of smartphone user typology. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(1), 37-47. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2015.13.1.37   DOI
13 M. S. Yim & M. S. Park. (2015). An exploratory research on individual differences of technostress: In convergence age. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(3), 137-153. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2015.13.3.137   DOI
14 H. O. Nho, Y. H. Kim & S. J. Hong. (2015). A study on technostress of information communication technology user. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 6(4), 41-46. DOI : 10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.4.041   DOI
15 M. S. Yim. (2018). A study on the relationship between mobile technostress and quality of work life : Focusing on the role of coping strategies. Korean Management Consulting Review, 18(1), 165-187.
16 F. D. Davis. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340. DOI : 10.2307/249008   DOI
17 S. Nakamoto. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
18 D. H. Caro & A. S. Sethi. (1985). Strategic management of technostress. Journal of Medical Systems, 9(5-6), 291-304. DOI : 10.1007/BF00992568   DOI
19 S. J. Kim. (2017). Block Chain Ecosystem Analysis and Implications. KISTEP Issue Paper, 9.
20 C. Brod. (1984). Technostress: The human cost of the computer revolution (Vol. 13, p. 242). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21 T. S. Ragu-Nathan, M. Tarafdar, B. S. Ragu-Nathan & Q. Tu. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417-433. DOI : 10.1287/isre.1070.0165   DOI
22 C. L. Cooper, C. P. Cooper, P. J. Dewe & M. P. O'Driscoll. (2001). Organizational stress: A review and critique of theory, research, and applications. Sage.
23 M. Tarafdar, Q. Tu, B. S. Ragu-Nathan & T. S. Ragu-Nathan. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328. DOI : 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109   DOI
24 R. Ayyagari, V. Grover & R. Purvis. (2011). Technostress: technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831-858.   DOI
25 H. D. Moon & J. W. Kim. (2009). A study on the TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) in involuntary IT usage environment. Journal of Digital Convergence, 7(3), 13-24.
26 S. Ram. (1987). A model of innovation resistance. Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 208-212.
27 V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis & F. D. Davis. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425-478. DOI : 10.2307/30036540   DOI
28 E. M. Rogers. (2003). Diffusion of innovations Free Press. New York, 551.
29 V. Venkatesh & F. D. Davis. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926   DOI