Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2019.9.6.091

A Study on Analysis Model for Weapon Acquisition Alternatives  

Lee, Ji-Young (Defense Agency for Technology and Quality(DTaQ))
Publication Information
Journal of Convergence for Information Technology / v.9, no.6, 2019 , pp. 91-96 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently, it is expected for requirement for more scientific research of weapon systems acquisition alternatives with reliability and objectivity. For these needs, study on methodology of weapon systems acquisition alternatives is but on-going, but it is still in its early stages and is unprofessional. We compared general decision making methods, government development program decision making methods, methodologies of weapon systems acquisition alternatives research such as AHP, ANP, KAAM and proposed AHP as weapon acquisition analysis. This study guarantees objectivity and derives scientific research results reliability by analyzing and comparing comprehensive elements such as cost, effectiveness, deployment schedule, program management risk. Further study on AHP weight and other decision making methods is needed considering category of weapon systems and program characteristics.
Keywords
Defense; Weapon systems; Acquisition methods; AHP; Decision making methods;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 DAPA. (2017). Defense Acquisition Program Act, RoK DAPA. [cited 2017 July 26], Available From: http://www.dapa.go.kr/dapa/main.do (accessed Apr. 20, 2019).
2 M. Majumder. (2015). Impact of Urbanization on Water Shortage in Face of Climatic Aberrations. pp.37-45, Springer Singapore. DOI : 10.1007/978-981-4560-73-3
3 MSIT. (2018). Preliminary Feasibility Study Guideline for Government R&D Program.
4 KISTEP. (2018). Preliminary Feasibility Study Standard Guideline for R&D Projects.
5 DAPA. (2019). Defense Acquisition Program Management Regualation.
6 S. Lee. (2018). An Empirical Study on Decision Making Support System for Weapons System Acquisition Selection. Master's thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
7 H. Eun. (2001). An Application of the AHP to the Selection of Airplane Type. Ph.D dissertation, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
8 H. Seol, G. Kim, H. Jung, H. Cho & C. Hwang. (2009). A Study on the Selection of Alternatives for Flight Attendants to Adapt Flying Conditions using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of KIMST, Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 12(4), 460-468.
9 Y. Lee & G. Kwon. (2019). Decision Making Framework for Knowledge Management Using Analytic Network Process. Conference of Korea Management Science, Korean Operations Research and Management Society. (pp. 1429-1436).
10 S. Jung. (2000). An Analytic Network Process Model for the Evaluating Weapon System. Master's thesis, Korea University, Seoul.
11 H. Jo. (2012). Development of Decision Making Models for Purchasing Foreign Weapon Systems. Ph.D dissertation, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea.
12 K. Park, K. Lee, C. Kim & S. Choi. (2007). A Study on Knowledge-based Alternatives Analysis Model (KAAM) for the Best Decision Making in Weapon Systems Acquisition. Journal of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea, 33(1), 2007.
13 S. T. Park, S. J. Lee & Y. K. Kim. (2011). Weight Differences of Patent Valuation Factors by Industries. Journal of Digital Convergence, 9(3), 105-116.   DOI