Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2019.9.4.109

Development and Effect of Biomimicry Robot Education Program based on Technology Education  

Kim, Sung-Ae (Woonam middle school)
Publication Information
Journal of Convergence for Information Technology / v.9, no.4, 2019 , pp. 109-117 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, it developed and applied a biomimicry robot education program based on technology education, and to examine its effects. To do this, We were developed a biomimetic robot education program and was applied to gifted education in the technology fields to examine changes of the effects along with satisfaction. The results are as follow: First, the biomimicry robot education program conducted over 15 hours in total, comprised of technological problem solving steps. Second, satisfaction as a quantitative research of this program was higher than average, and as a qualitative research also showed positive satisfaction. Third, the changes in the propensity for technological problem solving and attitudes toward robots were statistically significant after participation in the program.
Keywords
Technology education; Robotics education about biomimetic or biomimicry; Propensity for Technological problem solving; Attitude toward robots; Bio-Technology education;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 J. W. Park, J. Y. You & J. Y. Lee. (2014). 2014 KISTI Future Technology 10 : Biomimetic robots. Seoul : KISTI.
2 K. B. Choi & D. H. Kim. (2006). Biomimetic robot. Journal of Machinery, 46(4), 51-56.
3 C. H. Lee & H. S. Shin. (2016.). Technological Competitive Analysis of biomimetic robot by using Papers. Proceedings of KSMT Annual Meeting 2016. 29-33.
4 Z. Gao, Q. Shi, T. Fukuda, C. Li & Q. Huang. (2019). An overview of biomimetic robots with animal behaviors. Neurocomputing, 332, 339-350.   DOI
5 M. K. Habib. (2011). Biomimetics: innovations and robotics. International Journal of Mechatronics and Manufacturing Systems, 4(2), 113-134.   DOI
6 K. S. Ahn, J. H. Kim & B. H. Lee. (2017). Action Realization of Modular Robot Using Memory and Playback of Motion. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 7(6), 181-186   DOI
7 Ministry of Education. (2015). National Curriculum. Notice No. 2015-74 of the Ministry of Education. Sejong : Ministry of Education.
8 E. N. Savage. (1991). A Rationale for Bio-Related Technology in Technology Education. The Journal of Epsilon Pi Tau, 17(2), 59-62.
9 S. K. Nam. (2012). A Study on the Technological Thinking Disposition of Technology Subject Related Gifted Student. Journal of Korean Technology Education,12(3), 110-131.
10 S. Kim. (2018). The Developments and the Effect of TEAMS Integrative Education Programs based on 'Smart-city' Theme-Centered for the Robot Gifted Students in Secondary School. Journal of Korean Technology Education, 18(2), 40-61.
11 J. Fraenkel, N. Wallen & H. H. Hyun. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill
12 P. Heppner. (1988). The problem solving inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
13 T. F. Wu, R. L. Custer & M. J. Dyrenfurth. (1996). Technological and Personal Problem Solving Styles : Is there a Difference?. Journal of Technology Education, 7(2), 55-71.
14 C. S. Lee. (2013). Korean Students' Attitude Scale Towards Robot. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 19(2), 151-168.   DOI
15 T. W. Kim & S. Yi. (2015). Designing a PBL Problem for the Unit of 'Problem-Solving Activities" in the subject of Technology-Home Economics. Journal of Korean Technology Education, 15(1), 1-21.
16 S. Kim & S. Yi. (2015). Comparison of Perception Towards the STEAM Education for Mathematics/Science-Gifted Students andInvention-Gifted Students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(12), 1029-1049.
17 S. Kim. (2015). The developments of TEAMS integrative educational programs based on 'robot' theme-centered for the gifted education in secondary school. Doctoral dissertation. Korea National University of Education, Chung-buk. Korea.
18 S. Yi & S. A. Bae. (2007). Instructional Design for Fostering Students' Creative Problem Solving ability in Technology Education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 13(4), 77-98.   DOI
19 S. A. Kim & D. Y. Chung. (2006). A Study on the wayss of Robotics programs at thechnology education in middle school. Journal of Korean Technology Education, 6(4), 127-141.
20 A. Nagchaudhuri & G. Singh. (2003). Middle School Students get Introduced to Fundamentals of Engineering at the UMES-NOAA Summer Camp. Session#1170, 1-10.
21 S. A. Kim & S. B. Yi. (2017). Development of Robot Hands-on Activity for Achievement Standards of Advanced Technology in Technology System Domain Under the 2015 Revised High School Technology & Home Economics Subject Curriculum. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(7), 529-548.   DOI
22 S. Y. Kim. (2016). Teaching and learning(PBL) and explore the convergence of the Effects of the practical skills. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 7(2), 109-118.   DOI
23 R. Kimbell & K. Stables. (2009). Research as a design task. In International Handbook of Research and Development in Technology Education (pp. 599-613). Brill Sense.
24 S. C. Lee, T. Y. Kim, J. S. Kim, S. J. Kang & J. H. Yoon. (2019). The Effect of a Design Thinking-based Maker Education Program on the Creative Problem Solving Ability of Elementary School Students. JOURNAL OF The Korean Association of information Education, 23(1), 73-84.   DOI