Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2019.9.11.227

The Effect of a Mechanical Chest Compressions for Out-of-hospital Advanced Cardiac Life Support  

Lee, Hyeon-Ji (Department of Emegency Medical Services, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Convergence for Information Technology / v.9, no.11, 2019 , pp. 227-233 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of chest compression by conducting comparison research between mechanical chest compressor(LUCAS) and manuale cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR) in a out-of-hospital environment and suggest effective advanced cardiac life support using mechanical chest compressors. For this, a out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was simulated with a team of 3 ambulance workers, and manuale CPR and CPR using LUCAS were performed on site and during transport in an ambulance. The research results are as follows: the comparison of manuale CPR between on site and in an ambulance revealed that on-site manuale CPR showed significant differences in the average compression depth, compression rate, and relaxation rate. Second, the comparison between manuale CPR and LUCAS in an ambulance showed significant differences in the average compression depth, compression rate, the number of compression per minute.
Keywords
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Cardiac arrest; LUCAS; Mechanical chest compression; Paramedic;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 M. Levy, D. Yost, R. G. Walker, E. Scheunemann & S. R. Mendive. (2015). A quality improvement initiative to optimize use of a mechanical chest compression device within a high-performance CPR approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation, 92, 32-37.   DOI
2 G. Putzer, P. Braun, A. Zimmermann, F. Pedross, G. Strapazzon, H. Brugger & P. Paal. (2012). LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue-a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 31(2), 384-389.   DOI
3 C. K. Lin, M. C. Huang, Y. T. Feng, W. H. Jeng & K. I. Cheng. (2015). Effectiveness of mechanical chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in an emergency department. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 78(6), 360-363.   DOI
4 K. Y. Lee & S. W. Yun. (2011). Prehospital Care of 119 EMT for Non-traumatic Cardiac Arrest and Improvement to Increase Advanced Care Rate. Fire Science and engineering, 25(5), 21-31.
5 J. Mosier, A. Itty, A. Sanders, J. Mohler, C. Wendel, J. Poulsen, J. Shellenberger, L. Clark & B. Bobrow. (2010). Cardiocerebral Resuscitation is Associated with Improved Survival and Neurologic Outcome from Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest in Elders. Academic Emergency Medicine, 17(3), 269-275.   DOI
6 G. D. Perkins, R. Lall, T. Quinn & C. D. Deakin. (2015). Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 385(9972), 947-955. DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61886-9   DOI
7 C. Axelsson, J. Nestin, L. Svensson, A. B. Axelsson & J. Herlitz. (2006). Clinical consequences of the introduction of mechanical chest compression in the EMS system for treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-A pilot study. Resuscitation, 71(1), 47-55.   DOI
8 Q. He, Z. Wan & L. Wang. (2003). Random control trial of the efficacy of cardiopump on pre-hospital cardiac arrest. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue, 15(5), 292-294.
9 R. A. Gyory, S. E. Buchle, D. Rodgers & J. S. Lubin. (2017). The Efficacy of LUCAS in Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Scenarios: A Crossover Mannequin Study. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(3), 437-445. DOI : 10.5811/westjem.2017.1.32575   DOI
10 N. H. Krarup et al. (2011). Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is hampered by interruptions in chest compressions-a nationwide prospective feasibility study. Resuscitation, 82, 263-269.   DOI
11 C. K. Lin, M. C. Huang, Y. T. Feng, W. H. Jeng, T. C. Chung, Y. W. Lau & K. I. Cheng. (2015). Effectiveness of mechanical chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in an emergency department. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 78(6), 360-363. DOI : 10.1016/j.jcma.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Mar 5.   DOI
12 P. A. Meaney et al. (2013). Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality:Improving Cardiac Resuscitation Outcomes Both Inside and Outside the Hospital A Consensus Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation, 128, 417-435.   DOI
13 J. S. Byun, I. S. Cho & C. M. Ha. (2019). Comparison of outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with AutoPulse and LUCAS in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient. The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine, 30(1), 16-21.
14 S. Steen, Q. Liao, L. Pierre, A. Paskevicius & T. Sjoberg. (2002). Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation, 55(3), 285-299.   DOI
15 K. Couper, M. Smyth & G. D. Perkins. (2015). Mechanical devices for chest compression: to use or not to use?. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 2(1), 88-94.
16 S. G. Hong & I. A. Son. (2009). A study on the factors influencing the accuracy of chest compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation trying in a moving ambulance. The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine, 20(4), 343-354.
17 J. G. Lee, J. S. Kim & S. G. Roh. (2018). Comparison of chest compression and ventilation volume using LUCAS and manual in virtual reality-based ambulance simulation -A manikin study-. The Korean Journal of Emergency Medical Services, 22(3), 67-76.   DOI
18 G. Putzer, A. Fiala, P. Braun, S. Neururer, P. Paal. (2016). Manual versus Mechanical Chest Compressions on Surfaces of Varying Softness with or without Backboards: A Randomized, Crossover Manikin Study. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 50(4), 594-600.   DOI
19 D. Smekal, J. Johansson, T. Huzevka, S. Rubertsson. (2011). A pilot study of mechanical chest compressions with the $LUCAS^{TM}$ device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation, 82(6), 702-706.   DOI
20 H. J. Lee, H. J. Kim & E. K. Jun. (2017). The changes of symptom, EKG and hemodynamic in healty firefighters after delivering multiple cycles of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 18(6), 381-388.   DOI
21 C. Ji, R. Lall, T. Quinn, C. Kaye, On behalf of PARAMEDIC trial Collaborators. (2017). Post-admission outcomes of participants in the PARAMEDIC trial: A cluster randomised trial of mechanical or manual chest compressions. Resuscitation, 118, 82-88. DOI : 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.06.026. Epub 2017 Jul 5.   DOI
22 D. Smekal, E. Lindgren, H. Sandler, J. Johansson & S. Rubertsson. (2014). CPR-related injuries after manual or mechanical chest compressions with the $LUCAS^{TM}$ device: A multicentre study of victims after unsuccessful resuscitation. Resuscitation, 85(12), 1708-1712.   DOI
23 R. Baumeister, U. Held, M. J. Thali, P. M. Flach & S. Ross. (2015). Forensic imaging findings by post-mortem computed tomography after manual versus mechanical chest compression. Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging, 3(3), 167-173.   DOI
24 T. H. Kim et al. (2016). Quality between mechanical compression on reducible stretcher versus manual compression on standard stretcher in small elevator. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 34(8), 1604-1609.   DOI
25 F. J. Ochoa, E. Ramalle-Gomara, V. Lisa & I. Saralequi. (1998). The effect of rescuer fatigue on the quality of chest compressions. Resuscitation, 37(3), 149-152.   DOI
26 Y. S. Cho, S. C. Choi, C. A. Lee, Y. S. Jung & G. W. Kim. (2012). Comparison of Manual Versus Mechanical Chest Compression During Simulative out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest. The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine, 23(4), 486-492.