Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.5.101

Evaluation Method of Architecture Asset  

Choi, Han-yong (Division of IT Convergence Engineering, Shinhan University)
Publication Information
Journal of Convergence for Information Technology / v.8, no.5, 2018 , pp. 101-106 More about this Journal
Abstract
Software are being studied to register and manage assets. And Methods for evaluating software systems have been based on subjective evaluation criteria. We propose an evaluation model for evaluating complex assets obtained from the complexity measurement of the preceding asset management system. We used scales to measure and provide logical complexity to measure the complexity of our architectural assets. And we used a method to evaluate whether it expresses attribute value of architecture asset. We have also built an evaluation model criterion for evaluating the usability of the asset data based on the ISO/IEC 25010 quality model characteristics of the SQuaRE Series. When the designers design the asset as a composite asset, the optional evaluation of the negative property that weights are assigned according to the characteristics of each asset is applied to secure the flexibility of the evaluation model.
Keywords
Complexity; Asset; Quality Evaluation; Usability; Architecture;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 A. B. Younes, Y. B. Hlaoui & L. J. Ben Ayed. (2014). A Meta-Model Transformation from UML Activity Diagrams to Event-B Models. Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops (COMPSACW) 2014 IEEE 38th International. 740-745.
2 H. Y. Choi & S. H. Sim. (2015). A Study on Software Development method based on DMI. ICSMB. 2(1). 359-360.
3 Y. S. Choi & J. E. Hong. (2017). Designing Software Architecture for Reusing Open Source Software. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 7(2), 67-76.   DOI
4 H. D. Ryu & W. J. Lee. (2012). A Study on UML based Modeling and Automatic Code Generation for Embedded Software. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 2(1), 22-40.
5 J. S. Park, J. J. Kwon, J. E. Hong & Min Choi. (2013). Software Architecture Recovery for Android Application Reuse. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 3(2), 9-17.   DOI
6 S. Rajesh & A. Chandrasekar. (2016). An Efficient Object Oriented Design Model: By Measuring and Prioritizing the Design Metrics of UML Class Diagram with Preeminent Quality Attributes. IJST, 9(21), 1-9.
7 N. I. Altintas, S. Cetin, A. H Dogru & H. Oguztuzun. (2011). Modeling Product Line Software Assets Using Domain-Specific Kits. Software Engineering, IEEE Tr. 38(6), 1376-1402.
8 ISO/IEC 25010. (2011). System and Software Engineering-System and Software Quality Reauirements and Evaluation(SQuaRE)-System and Software Quality Models.
9 K. Phol, G. Bockle & F. van der Linden. (2010). Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles, and Techniques: Springer.
10 H. Y. Choi & S. H. Sim. (2017). A Study on the Optimization of Architecture Assets in DMI. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 143-149.
11 ISO/IEC 9126-1. (2011) Software Engineering-Product Quality- Part1: Quality Model.
12 S. Bernardi, J. Merseguer & D. C. Petriu. (2012). Dependability modeling and analysis of software systems specified with UML. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 45(1), 2.
13 V. B. Misic & S. Moser. (1997). Measuring Class Coupling and Cohesion : A Formal Metamodel Approach. ASPEC'97. 31-40.
14 H. Y. Choi. (2016). MetaData Structure Design of Architecture Asset in DMI. SMB, 6(4), 151-156.
15 H. Krahn, B. Rumpe & S. Volkel : MontiCore. (2010). a framework for compositional development of domain specific languages. STTT, 12(5), 353-372.   DOI