Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.2.141

A Study on the realization of the right to be forgotten on social normative context: focusing on comparison of Korea-US-EU and the legal, technical, and service market  

Shim, Mina (Department of Computer Engineering, Sungkyul University)
Publication Information
Journal of Convergence for Information Technology / v.8, no.2, 2018 , pp. 141-148 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore the scope of realization of multiple perspectives so that the implementation of the right to be forgotten is more realistic than the ideal information deletion concept. We examined domestic and foreign legal system and technology/service trends, and reflected the classification realization level of service realization, processing type and information characteristics of personal information processor, and legislative/technical factors for multi-level scope analysis. As a result, we have presented a matrix of the range of realization of the right to be forgotten and the scope of diversified regulation by the subject of protection. This study will be extended to the convergence of law and engineering, and will contribute to the prediction of social costs and expansion of the market by identifying the scope of 'deletion rights'.
Keywords
Right to be Forgotten; Freedom of Speech; Right to Delete; Privacy; Personal Information Protection(PIP); Right to Information Self-determination; Implementation Model and Service;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 J. W. Moon. (2011). The Korean Way of Balancing Two Fundamental Rights, the Right to Be Forgotten and the Right to Know. Journal of Media Law, Ethics and Policy, 10(2), 1-37. UCI : G704-001997.2011.10.2.014
2 J. Y. Hoa. (2012). “The Right to Be Forgotten” as the Information Privacy in Constitutional Law. Kungpook National University Law Journal, 39, 567-598. DOI : 10.17248/knulaw..39.201206.567
3 M. N. Shim. (2016). A Study of the Research the Right to be Forgotten from 2010. Journal of The Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology, 26(4), 1073-1084. DOI : 10.13089/JKIISC.2016.26.4.1073   DOI
4 I. S. Ham, (2016). The Enactment of 2016 General Data Protection Regulation(GDPR) in the EU and its Implications. Legal Research Institute of Chonnam National University, 36(3), 411-453. UCI : G704-002100.2016.36.3.018
5 Korea Communications Commission. (2016). Guidelines on the right of requesting exclusion of Internet self-access. Korea Communications Commission. http://eng.kcc.go.kr/user/ehpMain.do
6 E. S. Yoo. (2015). Legal Contemplation for the Right to Be Forgotten: From the Viewpoint of Information Subject, Nature of Information, Information Processor, Ways of Posting Information, etc. Journal of Media Law, Ethics and Policy, 14(1), 187-217.
7 KISA. (2012). A study on plan to reflect 'The right to be forgotten' in the legislative system. KISA-WP-2012-0041.
8 J. J. Lee. (2009). Establishment of 'the right to be forgotten'. Hansun foundation, 75-125.
9 S. Y. Ko. (2012. The study on the need for the 'right and obligation to forget' (or'oblivion rights and obligation'). Journal of a state law examination, 53(6), 27-35.
10 E. B. Ko, K. H. Choi & J. I. Lee. (2012). The difference of 'right to be forgotten' implemented in EU and Korea. Communications of the Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers, 30(10), 34-41.
11 NIA. (2014). Analysis of Judgments of the European Court of Justice and Implications. Research on Information Legislation, 3.
12 S. Y. Hong. (2014). Argument on the right to be forgotten and the freedom of expression-focused on the reforming the press arbitration system. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(6), 1-11. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2014.12.6.1   DOI
13 S. Y. Hong. (2014). Right to delete and Right to be forgotten-Discuss on the condition of the right to delete. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(12), 13-22. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2014.12.12.13   DOI