1 |
Molnar, C. (2020). Interpretable machine learning (2nd Edition), Independently published.
|
2 |
박상영, 최영재, & 이성주. (2021). 지속적 활용이 가능한 산학협력 특허 특성 분석. 한국산학기술학회 논문지, 22(3), 568-578.
|
3 |
장관용, & 양동우. (2014). 특허기술수명에 영향을 미치는 결정요인에 관한 실증 연구: 한국등록특허 갱신데이터를 활용하여. 지식재산연구, 9(2), 79-108.
|
4 |
추기능, & 박규호. (2010). 특허의 경제적 수명의 결정요인에 관한 연구: 갱신자료를 활용한 생존분석. 지식경영연구, 11(1), 65-81.
DOI
|
5 |
Barirani, A., Beaudry, C., & Agard, B. (2017). Can universities profit from general purpose inventions? The case of Canadian nanotechnology patents. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, 271-283.
DOI
|
6 |
Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of statistics, 1189-1232.
|
7 |
Apley, D. W., & Zhu, J. (2020). Visualizing the effects of predictor variables in black box supervised learning models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 82(4), 1059-1086.
DOI
|
8 |
Choi, Y. M., & Cho, D. (2018), A study on the time-dependent changes of the intensities of factors determining patent lifespan from a biological perspective, World Patent Information, 54, 1-17.
DOI
|
9 |
De Rassenfosse, G., & Jaffe, A. B. (2018). Are patent fees effective at weeding out low quality patents?, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 27(1), 134-148.
DOI
|
10 |
Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2002). Patents, citations, and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. MIT press.
|
11 |
Lanjouw, J. O. (1998), Patent protection in the shadow of infringement: Simulation estimations of patent value, The Review of Economic Studies, 65(4), 671-710.
DOI
|
12 |
Pitkethly, R. (1997), The valuation of patents: a review of patent valuation methods with consideration of option based methods and the potential for further research, Research Papers in Management Studies-University of Cambridge Judge Institute of Management Studies.
|
13 |
Schankerman, M. (1998), How valuable is patent protection? Estimates by technology field, the RAND Journal of Economics, 29(1), 77-107.
DOI
|
14 |
Guellec, D., & de la Potterie, B. V. P. (2000). Applications, grants and the value of patent, Economics letters, 69(1), 109-114
DOI
|
15 |
Danish, M. S., Ranjan, P., & Sharma, R. (2021), Determinants of patent survival in emerging economies: Evidence from residential patents in India, Journal of Public Affairs, 21(2), e2211.
|
16 |
Bessen, J. (2008). The value of US patents by owner and patent characteristics. Research Policy, 37(5), 932-945.
DOI
|
17 |
Choi, J., Jeong, B., Yoon, J., Coh, B. Y., & Lee, J. M. (2020). A novel approach to evaluating the business potential of intellectual properties: A machine learning-based predictive analysis of patent lifetime, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 145, 106544.
DOI
|
18 |
Ernst, H., Leptien, C., & Vitt, J. (2000). Inventors are not alike: The distribution of patenting output among industrial R&D personnel. IEEE Transactions on engineering management, 47(2), 184-199.
DOI
|
19 |
Fisher, A., Rudin, C., & Dominici, F. (2019). All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneously. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 20(177), 1-81.
|
20 |
Jaffe, A. B., & Lerner, J. (2011). Innovation and its discontents. In Innovation and Its Discontents. Princeton University Press.
|
21 |
Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2001). Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition. RAND journal of economics, 129-151.
DOI
|
22 |
Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
|
23 |
Og, J. Y., Pawelec, K., Kim, B. K., Paprocki, R., & Jeong, E. (2020), Measuring patent value indicators with patent renewal information, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(1), 16.
DOI
|
24 |
Schankerman, M., & Pakes, A. (1986), Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During the Post-1950 Period. The Economic Journal, 96(384), 1052-1076.
DOI
|
25 |
Van Zeebroeck, N. (2011). The puzzle of patent value indicators. Economics of innovation and new technology, 20(1), 33-62.
DOI
|
26 |
Lanjouw, J. O. (1993), Patent Protection: Of What Value and for How Long?, NBER Working Paper, No. 4475.
|
27 |
Pakes, A., & Schankerman, M. (1984), The rate of obsolescence of patents, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources, R&D, patents, and productivity, University of Chicago Press.
|
28 |
Reitzig, M. (2002), Valuing patents and patent portfolios from a corporate perspective : theoretical considerations, applied needs and future challenges : background paper for discussion, UN. ECE. High Level Task Force on Valuation and Capitalization of Intellectual Assets, 26.
|
29 |
Reitzig, M. (2004). Improving patent valuations for management purposes-validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales. Research policy, 33(6-7), 939-957.
DOI
|
30 |
Scherer, F. M., Harhoff, D., & Kukies, J. (2000), Uncertainty and the size distribution of rewards from innovation, Journal of Evolutionary Economics volume, 10, 175-200.
DOI
|
31 |
Sullivan, R. J. (1994), Estimates of the value of patent rights in Great Britain and Ireland 1852-1876, Economica, 61(241), 37-58.
DOI
|
32 |
Van Zeebroeck, N., Stevnsborg, N., De La Potterie, B. V. P., Guellec, D., & Archontopoulos, E. (2008). Patent inflation in Europe. World Patent Information, 30(1), 43-52.
DOI
|
33 |
Shapiro, C. (2000). Navigating the patent thicket: Cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting. Innovation policy and the economy, 1, 119-150.
DOI
|
34 |
Jaffe, A. B. (2000). The US patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process. Research policy, 29(4-5), 531-557.
DOI
|
35 |
Van Zeebroeck, N., & Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2011a). The vulnerability of patent value determinants. Economics of innovation and new technology, 20(3), 283-308.
DOI
|
36 |
Van Zeebroeck, N., & Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2011b). Filing strategies and patent value. Economics of innovation and new technology, 20(6), 539-561.
DOI
|