Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2021.27.4.049

Knowledge graph-based knowledge map for efficient expression and inference of associated knowledge  

Yoo, Keedong (Dept. of Business Administration, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems / v.27, no.4, 2021 , pp. 49-71 More about this Journal
Abstract
Users who intend to utilize knowledge to actively solve given problems proceed their jobs with cross- and sequential exploration of associated knowledge related each other in terms of certain criteria, such as content relevance. A knowledge map is the diagram or taxonomy overviewing status of currently managed knowledge in a knowledge-base, and supports users' knowledge exploration based on certain relationships between knowledge. A knowledge map, therefore, must be expressed in a networked form by linking related knowledge based on certain types of relationships, and should be implemented by deploying proper technologies or tools specialized in defining and inferring them. To meet this end, this study suggests a methodology for developing the knowledge graph-based knowledge map using the Graph DB known to exhibit proper functionality in expressing and inferring relationships between entities and their relationships stored in a knowledge-base. Procedures of the proposed methodology are modeling graph data, creating nodes, properties, relationships, and composing knowledge networks by combining identified links between knowledge. Among various Graph DBs, the Neo4j is used in this study for its high credibility and applicability through wide and various application cases. To examine the validity of the proposed methodology, a knowledge graph-based knowledge map is implemented deploying the Graph DB, and a performance comparison test is performed, by applying previous research's data to check whether this study's knowledge map can yield the same level of performance as the previous one did. Previous research's case is concerned with building a process-based knowledge map using the ontology technology, which identifies links between related knowledge based on the sequences of tasks producing or being activated by knowledge. In other words, since a task not only is activated by knowledge as an input but also produces knowledge as an output, input and output knowledge are linked as a flow by the task. Also since a business process is composed of affiliated tasks to fulfill the purpose of the process, the knowledge networks within a business process can be concluded by the sequences of the tasks composing the process. Therefore, using the Neo4j, considered process, task, and knowledge as well as the relationships among them are defined as nodes and relationships so that knowledge links can be identified based on the sequences of tasks. The resultant knowledge network by aggregating identified knowledge links is the knowledge map equipping functionality as a knowledge graph, and therefore its performance needs to be tested whether it meets the level of previous research's validation results. The performance test examines two aspects, the correctness of knowledge links and the possibility of inferring new types of knowledge: the former is examined using 7 questions, and the latter is checked by extracting two new-typed knowledge. As a result, the knowledge map constructed through the proposed methodology has showed the same level of performance as the previous one, and processed knowledge definition as well as knowledge relationship inference in a more efficient manner. Furthermore, comparing to the previous research's ontology-based approach, this study's Graph DB-based approach has also showed more beneficial functionality in intensively managing only the knowledge of interest, dynamically defining knowledge and relationships by reflecting various meanings from situations to purposes, agilely inferring knowledge and relationships through Cypher-based query, and easily creating a new relationship by aggregating existing ones, etc. This study's artifacts can be applied to implement the user-friendly function of knowledge exploration reflecting user's cognitive process toward associated knowledge, and can further underpin the development of an intelligent knowledge-base expanding autonomously through the discovery of new knowledge and their relationships by inference. This study, moreover than these, has an instant effect on implementing the networked knowledge map essential to satisfying contemporary users eagerly excavating the way to find proper knowledge to use.
Keywords
Knowledge graph; Knowledge map; Graph DB; Associated knowledge; Neo4j;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Chai, X., "Diagnosis Method of Thyroid Disease Combining Knowledge Graph and Deep Learning", IEEE Access, vol.8 (2020), 149787-149795.   DOI
2 Ehrlinger, L. and W. Woss. "Towards a Definition of Knowledge Graphs", SEMANTiCS (Posters, Demos, SuCCESS), vol.48, no.1-4(2016).
3 Hitzler, P. "A review of the semantic web field", Communications of the ACM, vol.64, no.2(2021), 76-83.   DOI
4 Hogan, A., E. Blomqvist, M. Cochez, C. D'amato, G.D. Melo, C. Gutierrez, S. Kirrane, J.E.L. Gayo, R. Navigli, S. Neumaier, A.-C.N. Ngomo, A. Polleres, S.M. Rashid, A. Rula, L. Schmelzeisen, J. Sequeda, S. Staab, and A. Zimmermann, "Knowledge Graphs", ACM Computing Surveys, vol.54, no.4(2021), 1-37.
5 Jang, K. and K. Yoo, "User-oriented Performance Comparison between Hierarchical and Networked Knowledge", Knowledge Management Research, vol.22, no.3(2021), 75-89.
6 Aasman, J., "Transmuting Information to Knowledge with an Enterprise Knowledge Graph", IT Professional, vol.19, no.6(2017), 44-51.   DOI
7 Ait-Mlouk, A. and L. Jiang, "KBot: A Knowledge Graph Based ChatBot for Natural Language Understanding Over Linked Data", IEEE Access, vol.8 (2020), 149220-149230.   DOI
8 Burford, S., "A grounded theory of the practice of web information architecture in large organizations", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol.65, no.10(2014), 2017-2034.
9 Fathy, N., W. Gad, N. Badr, and M. Hashem, "ProGOMap: Automatic Generation of Mappings From Property Graphs to Ontologies," IEEE Access, vol.9(2021), 113100-113116.   DOI
10 Jacob, E.K., and A. Loehrlein, "Information architecture", Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol.43, no.1(2009), 3.1-3.64.
11 Jiang, Z., C. Chi and Y. Zhan, "Let Knowledge Make Recommendations for You," IEEE Access, vol.9 (2021), 118194-118204.   DOI
12 Ji, S., S. Pan, E. Cambria, P. Marttinen, and P.S. Yu, "A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition, and Applications," IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3070843.   DOI
13 Martinez-Rodriguez, J.L., I. Lopez-Arevalo, and A.B. Rios-Alvarado, "OpenIE-based approach for Knowledge Graph construction from text", Expert Systems with Applications, vol.113 (2018), 339-355.   DOI
14 Rao, L., G. Mansingh, and K.M. Osei-Bryson, "Building ontology based knowledge maps to assist business process re-engineering", Decision Support Systems, vol.52, no.3(2012), 577-589.   DOI
15 Kim, S., E. Suh, and H. Hwang, "Building the knowledge map: an industrial case study", Journal of knowledge management, vol.7(2003), 34-45.   DOI
16 Novak, J.D. and D. Musonda, , "A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning", American Educational Research Journal, vol.28, no.1(1991), 117-153.   DOI
17 Lai, J.-Y., C.-T. Wang, and C.-Y. Chou, "How knowledge map fit and personalization affect success of KMS in high-tech firms", Technovation, vol.29(2009), 313-324.   DOI
18 Latham, D., "Information architecture: Notes toward a new curriculum", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol.53, no.10(2002), 824-830.   DOI
19 Lin, F. and J. Yu, "Visualized cognitive knowledge map integration for P2P networks", Decision Support Systems, vol.46, no.4(2009), 774-785.   DOI
20 O'Donnell, A.M., D.F. Dansereau, and R.H. Hall, "Knowledge Maps as Scaffolds for Cognitive Processing", Educational Psychology Review, vol.14, no.1(2002), 71-86.   DOI
21 Paulheim, H., "Knowledge Graph Refinement: A Survey of Approaches and Evaluation Methods", Semantic Web, vol.8, no.3(2017), 489-508.   DOI
22 Suh, J. and H. Lee, "Technology trends and application cases of graph DB", Technical Report(ITFind), Institute of Information and Communications Technology Planning and Evaluation, 2020.
23 Toms, E.G., "Information interaction: Providing a framework for information architecture", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol.53, no.10(2002), 855-862.   DOI
24 Vicknair, C., M. Macias, Z. Zhao, X. Nan, Y. Chen, and D. Wilkins, "A comparison of a graph database and a relational database: A data provenance perspective", Proceedings of the 48th ACM Southeast Conference, (2010), 10.42. 10.1145/1900008.1900067.   DOI
25 Yoo, K., "Keyword-based networked knowledge map expressing content relevance between knowledge", Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, vol.24, no.3(2018), 119-134.   DOI
26 Wang, Q., Mao, Z., Wang, B., and Guo, L., "Knowledge Graph Embedding: A Survey of Approaches and Applications", IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol.29, no.12(2017), 2724-2743.   DOI
27 Yan, H., J. Yang, and J. Wan, "KnowIME: A system to construct a knowledge graph for intelligent manufacturing equipment", IEEE Access, vol.8 (2020), 41805-41813.   DOI
28 Yoo, K., "Ontology-based process-oriented knowledge map enabling referential navigation between knowledge", Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, vol.18, no.2(2012), 61-83.   DOI
29 Zheng L., S. Liu, Z. Song, and F. Dou, "Diversity-Aware Entity Exploration on Knowledge Graph", IEEE Access, vol.9(2021), 118782-118793.   DOI
30 Zhu, H., Y. Liu, F. Tian, Y. Ni, K. Wu, Y. Chen, and Q. Zheng, "A Cross-Curriculum Video Recommendation Algorithm Based on a Video-Associated Knowledge Map", IEEE Access, vol.6(2018), 57562-57571.   DOI
31 Yoo, K., E. Suh, and K.-Y. Kim, "Knowledge flow-based business process redesign: applying a knowledge map to redesign a business process", Journal of knowledge management, vol.11(2007), 104-125.   DOI