Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2020.26.3.051

Impact of Shortly Acquired IPO Firms on ICT Industry Concentration  

Chang, YoungBong (Business School, Sungkyunkwan University)
Kwon, YoungOk (Division of Business Administration, Sookmyung Women's University)
Publication Information
Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems / v.26, no.3, 2020 , pp. 51-69 More about this Journal
Abstract
Now, it is a stylized fact that a small number of technology firms such as Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook and a few others have become larger and dominant players in an industry. Coupled with the rise of these leading firms, we have also observed that a large number of young firms have become an acquisition target in their early IPO stages. This indeed results in a sharp decline in the number of new entries in public exchanges although a series of policy reforms have been promulgated to foster competition through an increase in new entries. Given the observed industry trend in recent decades, a number of studies have reported increased concentration in most developed countries. However, it is less understood as to what caused an increase in industry concentration. In this paper, we uncover the mechanisms by which industries have become concentrated over the last decades by tracing the changes in industry concentration associated with a firm's status change in its early IPO stages. To this end, we put emphasis on the case in which firms are acquired shortly after they went public. Especially, with the transition to digital-based economies, it is imperative for incumbent firms to adapt and keep pace with new ICT and related intelligent systems. For instance, after the acquisition of a young firm equipped with AI-based solutions, an incumbent firm may better respond to a change in customer taste and preference by integrating acquired AI solutions and analytics skills into multiple business processes. Accordingly, it is not unusual for young ICT firms become an attractive acquisition target. To examine the role of M&As involved with young firms in reshaping the level of industry concentration, we identify a firm's status in early post-IPO stages over the sample periods spanning from 1990 to 2016 as follows: i) being delisted, ii) being standalone firms and iii) being acquired. According to our analysis, firms that have conducted IPO since 2000s have been acquired by incumbent firms at a relatively quicker time than those that did IPO in previous generations. We also show a greater acquisition rate for IPO firms in the ICT sector compared with their counterparts in other sectors. Our results based on multinomial logit models suggest that a large number of IPO firms have been acquired in their early post-IPO lives despite their financial soundness. Specifically, we show that IPO firms are likely to be acquired rather than be delisted due to financial distress in early IPO stages when they are more profitable, more mature or less leveraged. For those IPO firms with venture capital backup have also become an acquisition target more frequently. As a larger number of firms are acquired shortly after their IPO, our results show increased concentration. While providing limited evidence on the impact of large incumbent firms in explaining the change in industry concentration, our results show that the large firms' effect on industry concentration are pronounced in the ICT sector. This result possibly captures the current trend that a few tech giants such as Alphabet, Apple and Facebook continue to increase their market share. In addition, compared with the acquisitions of non-ICT firms, the concentration impact of IPO firms in early stages becomes larger when ICT firms are acquired as a target. Our study makes new contributions. To our best knowledge, this is one of a few studies that link a firm's post-IPO status to associated changes in industry concentration. Although some studies have addressed concentration issues, their primary focus was on market power or proprietary software. Contrast to earlier studies, we are able to uncover the mechanism by which industries have become concentrated by placing emphasis on M&As involving young IPO firms. Interestingly, the concentration impact of IPO firm acquisitions are magnified when a large incumbent firms are involved as an acquirer. This leads us to infer the underlying reasons as to why industries have become more concentrated with a favor of large firms in recent decades. Overall, our study sheds new light on the literature by providing a plausible explanation as to why industries have become concentrated.
Keywords
ICT firms/ industries; Mergers and acquisitions; IPO; Industry concentration;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Cho, W., Y. Chang, and Y. Kwon, "Intents of Acquisitions in Information Technology Industries," Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, Vol.22, No.4(2016), 123-138.   DOI
2 Choi, Y.H., "A new era of innovation. Science and technology is still the only way to survive," Chosun Biz, 2017. Available at https://biz.chosun.com/ (Acceesed on 13 August, 2020).
3 CNN, "PayPal IPO raises $70.2M," 2002. Available at http://money.cnn.com/2002/02/14/ipo/paypal/.
4 Aggarwal, R.K., L. Krigman, and K.L. Womack, "Strategic IPO underpricing, information momentum, and lockup expiration selling," Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.66, No.1(2002), 105-137.   DOI
5 Arthurs, J.D. and L.W. Busenitz, "Dynamic capabilities and venture performance: The effects of venture capitalists," Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.21, No.2(2006), 195-215.   DOI
6 Downes, L. and P. Nunes, "Big Bang Disruption," Harvard Business Review, Vol.91, No.3(2013), 44-56.
7 Cross, B., "How location technology and IoT data are transforming business," Forbes, 2018. Available at https://www.forbes.com(Acceesedon10May,2020).
8 De, S. and J. Jindra. "Why newly listed firms become acquisition targets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol.36, No.9(2012), 2616-2631.   DOI
9 Doidge, C., G. Karolyi, and R. Stulz, "The US listing gap," Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.123, No.3(2017) , 464-487.   DOI
10 Dwyer, P., "Should America's Tech Giants Be Broken Up?," Bloomberg Businessweek, 2017. Available at https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-20/should-america-s-tech-giants-be-broken-up (Acceesed on 10 May, 2020).
11 Eisenmann, T.R. "Internet companies' growth strategies: determinants of investment intensity and long-term performance," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.27, No.12(2006), 1183-1204.   DOI
12 Chang, Y. and W. Cho, "The risk implications of mergers and acquisitions with information technology firms," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.34, No.1(2017), 232-267.   DOI
13 Foster, L., J. Haltiwanger, and C.J. Krizan, "Market selection, reallocation, and restructuring in the US retail trade sector in the 1990s," The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.88, No.4(2006), 748-758   DOI
14 Grullon, G., Y. Larkin, and R. Michaely. "Are US industries becoming more concentrated?" Review of Finance, Vol.23, No.4(2019), 697-743.   DOI
15 Hall, J. and S. Liedtka, "Financial performance, CEO compensation, and large-scale information technology decisions," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.22, No.1(2005), 193-221.   DOI
16 Jain, B. A., N. Jayaraman, and O. Kini, "The path-to-profitability of internet IPO firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.23, No.2(2008), 165-194.   DOI
17 Autor, D., D. Dorn, L. Katz, C. Patterson, and J. Van Reenen, "The fall of the labor share and the rise of superstar firms," National Bureau of Economic Research, No.23396(2017).
18 Hovakimian, A. and I. Hutton, "Merger-Motivated IPOs," Financial Management, Vol.39, No.4(2010), 1547-1573.   DOI
19 Iansiti, M. and R.L. Lakhani, "Managing Our Hub Economy," Harvard Business Review, 2017, Available at https://hbr.org/2017/09/managing-our-hub-economy#comment-section(Acceesedon10May,2020).
20 Irvine, P. J. and J. Pontiff, "Idiosyncratic return volatility, cash flows, and product market competition," Review of Financial Studies, Vol.22, No.3(2009), 1149-1177.   DOI
21 Jones, S., "Salesforce.com lands deal for online- marketing race," The Wall Street Journal, 2013. Available at https://www.wsj.com(Acceesedon10May,2020).
22 Officer, M.S., "The price of corporate liquidity: Acquisition discounts for unlisted targets," Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.83, No.3(2007), 571-598.   DOI
23 Gao, X., J. Ritter, and Z. Zhu, "Where have all the IPOs gone?. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol.48, No.6(2013), 1663-1692.   DOI
24 Ragozzino, R. and J.J. Reuer, "Initial public offerings and the acquisition of entrepreneurial firms," Strategic Organization, Vol.5, No.2(2007), 155-176.   DOI
25 Ritter, J. R. and I. Welch, "A review of IPO activity, pricing, and allocations," Journal of Finance, Vol.57, No.4(2002), 1795-1828.   DOI
26 Boyer, B.H. "Style-related comovement: Fundamentals or labels?" Journal of Finance, Vol.66, No.1(2011), 307-332.   DOI
27 Bain, J.S., "Relation of profit rate to industry concentration: American manufacturing, 1936-1940," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.65, No.3(1951), 293-324.   DOI
28 Baek, Y.S. "Fine AI bluechips. Global M&As by Apple.Google.Facebook" Digital Today, 2020. Availabel at http://www.digitaltoday.co.kr/ (Acceesed on 13 August, 2020).
29 Bessen, J., "Information technology and industry concentration," Boston Univ. School of Law, 2017. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3044730 (Acceesed on 10 May, 2020).
30 Schmalensee, R., "Inter-industry studies of structure and performance," Handbook of industrial organization, Vol.2, (1989), 951-1009.   DOI
31 Shapiro, C. and H.R. Varian, Information rules: a strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business Press, 2013.
32 Uhlenbruck, K., M.A. Hitt, and M. Semadeni, "Market value effects of acquisitions involving Internet firms: A resource-based analysis," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.27, No.10(2006), 899-913.   DOI
33 Wooldridge, J. "Control Function and Related Methods," in: Lecture for the "What's New in Econometrics?," NBER, 2007.
34 Wooldridge, J., Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. Cengage Learning, Mason, OH, 2009.
35 Zingales, L., "Insider ownership and the decision to go public," The review of economic studies, Vol.62, No.3(1995), 425-448.   DOI
36 Rock, K., "Why new issues are underpriced?," Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.15, No.1-2(1986), 187-212.   DOI